在超高剂量率下,氧浓度改变ROS产率,质粒DNA损伤变化较小。

IF 3.4 4区 医学 Q3 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
William Thomas, Siddharth Kulkarni, Aleksandra Ilina, Matthew Reed, Brian W Pogue
{"title":"在超高剂量率下,氧浓度改变ROS产率,质粒DNA损伤变化较小。","authors":"William Thomas, Siddharth Kulkarni, Aleksandra Ilina, Matthew Reed, Brian W Pogue","doi":"10.1093/bjr/tqaf245","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Ultra-high dose rate (UHDR) radiotherapy has become a large area of research due to observed normal tissue sparing without sacrificing tumor control, termed the FLASH effect. The purpose of this study was to compare reactive oxygen species (ROS) production and DNA damage across various O2 levels at UHDR and conventional dose rates (CDR) in solutions without repair enzymes and radical scavengers.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Solution assays of both ROS and DNA damage assessed dose rate and oxygen dependent (0-20% O2) changes between UHDR and CDR from an IntraOp Mobetron. For ROS reporters Amplex UltraRed (H2O2), and CellROX Deep Red (non-H2O2) were quantified via intensity per unit dose. DNA damage assayed plasmid pBR322 gel electrophoresis, to differentiate both single (SSB) and double strand breaks (DSB).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>For ROS assays, a significant reduction was noted from CDR to UHDR across all measured oxygen levels. The generation of H2O2 decreased when departing from physiologically relevant oxygen levels (1-5%), with generation 30-40% lower at UHDR. The DNA damage assay showed no trends in the SSB or DSB values with O2.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Examination of trends between ROS and DNA damage from factors such as oxygen can help elucidate FLASH mechanisms. The H2O2 yield has maximum yield at physiological oxygenation levels (1-5%), and UHDR further diminishes yield. In DNA damage no trend was observed. It is possible that these mechanisms have underlying effects on the FLASH effect in vivo.</p><p><strong>Advances in knowledge: </strong>This study is the first to directly compare radiation chemistry differences caused by UHDR to biologically relevant DNA damage in identical solutions.</p>","PeriodicalId":9306,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Radiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Oxygen concentration alters ROS yields with minor plasmid DNA damage change at Ultra High Dose Rate.\",\"authors\":\"William Thomas, Siddharth Kulkarni, Aleksandra Ilina, Matthew Reed, Brian W Pogue\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/bjr/tqaf245\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Ultra-high dose rate (UHDR) radiotherapy has become a large area of research due to observed normal tissue sparing without sacrificing tumor control, termed the FLASH effect. The purpose of this study was to compare reactive oxygen species (ROS) production and DNA damage across various O2 levels at UHDR and conventional dose rates (CDR) in solutions without repair enzymes and radical scavengers.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Solution assays of both ROS and DNA damage assessed dose rate and oxygen dependent (0-20% O2) changes between UHDR and CDR from an IntraOp Mobetron. For ROS reporters Amplex UltraRed (H2O2), and CellROX Deep Red (non-H2O2) were quantified via intensity per unit dose. DNA damage assayed plasmid pBR322 gel electrophoresis, to differentiate both single (SSB) and double strand breaks (DSB).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>For ROS assays, a significant reduction was noted from CDR to UHDR across all measured oxygen levels. The generation of H2O2 decreased when departing from physiologically relevant oxygen levels (1-5%), with generation 30-40% lower at UHDR. The DNA damage assay showed no trends in the SSB or DSB values with O2.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Examination of trends between ROS and DNA damage from factors such as oxygen can help elucidate FLASH mechanisms. The H2O2 yield has maximum yield at physiological oxygenation levels (1-5%), and UHDR further diminishes yield. In DNA damage no trend was observed. It is possible that these mechanisms have underlying effects on the FLASH effect in vivo.</p><p><strong>Advances in knowledge: </strong>This study is the first to directly compare radiation chemistry differences caused by UHDR to biologically relevant DNA damage in identical solutions.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9306,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"British Journal of Radiology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"British Journal of Radiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/bjr/tqaf245\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Journal of Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/bjr/tqaf245","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:超高剂量率(UHDR)放疗由于在不牺牲肿瘤控制的情况下观察到正常组织的保留而成为研究的一个大领域,称为FLASH效应。本研究的目的是比较在不含修复酶和自由基清除剂的溶液中,在UHDR和常规剂量率(CDR)下不同O2水平下活性氧(ROS)的产生和DNA损伤。方法:采用溶液法检测ROS和DNA损伤,评估UHDR和CDR之间的剂量率和氧依赖(0-20% O2)变化。对于ROS报告者,Amplex UltraRed (H2O2)和CellROX Deep Red(非H2O2)通过单位剂量的强度进行量化。DNA损伤检测质粒pBR322凝胶电泳,区分单链断裂(SSB)和双链断裂(DSB)。结果:对于活性氧分析,在所有测量的氧水平中,从CDR到UHDR都有显著的降低。当偏离生理相关的氧气水平(1-5%)时,H2O2的生成量减少,在UHDR时,生成量减少30-40%。DNA损伤分析显示,SSB或DSB值与O2没有变化趋势。结论:研究活性氧与DNA损伤之间的关系有助于阐明FLASH的机制。H2O2产率在生理氧合水平(1-5%)时最高,UHDR进一步降低了产率。在DNA损伤方面没有观察到趋势。这些机制可能对体内的FLASH效应有潜在的影响。知识进展:本研究首次直接比较了相同溶液中UHDR引起的辐射化学差异与生物学相关的DNA损伤。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Oxygen concentration alters ROS yields with minor plasmid DNA damage change at Ultra High Dose Rate.

Objective: Ultra-high dose rate (UHDR) radiotherapy has become a large area of research due to observed normal tissue sparing without sacrificing tumor control, termed the FLASH effect. The purpose of this study was to compare reactive oxygen species (ROS) production and DNA damage across various O2 levels at UHDR and conventional dose rates (CDR) in solutions without repair enzymes and radical scavengers.

Methods: Solution assays of both ROS and DNA damage assessed dose rate and oxygen dependent (0-20% O2) changes between UHDR and CDR from an IntraOp Mobetron. For ROS reporters Amplex UltraRed (H2O2), and CellROX Deep Red (non-H2O2) were quantified via intensity per unit dose. DNA damage assayed plasmid pBR322 gel electrophoresis, to differentiate both single (SSB) and double strand breaks (DSB).

Results: For ROS assays, a significant reduction was noted from CDR to UHDR across all measured oxygen levels. The generation of H2O2 decreased when departing from physiologically relevant oxygen levels (1-5%), with generation 30-40% lower at UHDR. The DNA damage assay showed no trends in the SSB or DSB values with O2.

Conclusion: Examination of trends between ROS and DNA damage from factors such as oxygen can help elucidate FLASH mechanisms. The H2O2 yield has maximum yield at physiological oxygenation levels (1-5%), and UHDR further diminishes yield. In DNA damage no trend was observed. It is possible that these mechanisms have underlying effects on the FLASH effect in vivo.

Advances in knowledge: This study is the first to directly compare radiation chemistry differences caused by UHDR to biologically relevant DNA damage in identical solutions.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
British Journal of Radiology
British Journal of Radiology 医学-核医学
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
3.80%
发文量
330
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: BJR is the international research journal of the British Institute of Radiology and is the oldest scientific journal in the field of radiology and related sciences. Dating back to 1896, BJR’s history is radiology’s history, and the journal has featured some landmark papers such as the first description of Computed Tomography "Computerized transverse axial tomography" by Godfrey Hounsfield in 1973. A valuable historical resource, the complete BJR archive has been digitized from 1896. Quick Facts: - 2015 Impact Factor – 1.840 - Receipt to first decision – average of 6 weeks - Acceptance to online publication – average of 3 weeks - ISSN: 0007-1285 - eISSN: 1748-880X Open Access option
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信