错配负性比较:脑电图,SQUID-MEG和新型4氦- opms

IF 3.3 2区 医学 Q1 NEUROIMAGING
Tjerk P. Gutteling, Jérémie Mattout, Sébastien Daligault, Julien Jung, Etienne Labyt, Denis Schwartz, Françoise Lecaignard
{"title":"错配负性比较:脑电图,SQUID-MEG和新型4氦- opms","authors":"Tjerk P. Gutteling,&nbsp;Jérémie Mattout,&nbsp;Sébastien Daligault,&nbsp;Julien Jung,&nbsp;Etienne Labyt,&nbsp;Denis Schwartz,&nbsp;Françoise Lecaignard","doi":"10.1002/hbm.70368","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Magneto-encephalography (MEG) provides a higher spatial resolution than electro-encephalography (EEG) to measure human auditory responses. However, conventional cryogenic MEG systems (SQUID-MEG) suffer from severe technological restrictions limiting, for instance, routine clinical use. Fortunately, a new generation of MEG sensors, optically pumped magnetometers (OPMs), has been developed to bridge the gap, combining the wearability of EEG with the benefits of MEG signal acquisition. We aim to assess their potential for studying auditory mismatch processing. The auditory mismatch negativity (MMN) is a well-characterized evoked component observable using a passive oddball paradigm with two-tone sound sequences. It has been extensively described using both EEG and MEG and is part of many EEG-based clinical applications, such as the assessment of patients with disorders of consciousness. MMN is therefore a relevant candidate to evaluate OPM performance. We use recently developed Helium-OPMs, which are high dynamic range MEG sensors that operate at room temperature. We compare their performance with cryogenic SQUID-MEG and EEG in a passive frequency oddball paradigm. Results show a significant MMN across subjects in all modalities as well as a high temporal similarity between modalities. Signal-to-noise ratios were also similar, and detection of significant individual MMN (within-subjects) using the OPM system was equal to or better than EEG. Given that the OPM system tested here is a prototype comprised of only five sensors, these results are a promising step towards wearable MEG that combines the advantages of MEG and EEG.</p>","PeriodicalId":13019,"journal":{"name":"Human Brain Mapping","volume":"46 14","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/hbm.70368","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Mismatch Negativity Compared: EEG, SQUID-MEG, and Novel 4Helium-OPMs\",\"authors\":\"Tjerk P. Gutteling,&nbsp;Jérémie Mattout,&nbsp;Sébastien Daligault,&nbsp;Julien Jung,&nbsp;Etienne Labyt,&nbsp;Denis Schwartz,&nbsp;Françoise Lecaignard\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/hbm.70368\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Magneto-encephalography (MEG) provides a higher spatial resolution than electro-encephalography (EEG) to measure human auditory responses. However, conventional cryogenic MEG systems (SQUID-MEG) suffer from severe technological restrictions limiting, for instance, routine clinical use. Fortunately, a new generation of MEG sensors, optically pumped magnetometers (OPMs), has been developed to bridge the gap, combining the wearability of EEG with the benefits of MEG signal acquisition. We aim to assess their potential for studying auditory mismatch processing. The auditory mismatch negativity (MMN) is a well-characterized evoked component observable using a passive oddball paradigm with two-tone sound sequences. It has been extensively described using both EEG and MEG and is part of many EEG-based clinical applications, such as the assessment of patients with disorders of consciousness. MMN is therefore a relevant candidate to evaluate OPM performance. We use recently developed Helium-OPMs, which are high dynamic range MEG sensors that operate at room temperature. We compare their performance with cryogenic SQUID-MEG and EEG in a passive frequency oddball paradigm. Results show a significant MMN across subjects in all modalities as well as a high temporal similarity between modalities. Signal-to-noise ratios were also similar, and detection of significant individual MMN (within-subjects) using the OPM system was equal to or better than EEG. Given that the OPM system tested here is a prototype comprised of only five sensors, these results are a promising step towards wearable MEG that combines the advantages of MEG and EEG.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13019,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Human Brain Mapping\",\"volume\":\"46 14\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/hbm.70368\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Human Brain Mapping\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/hbm.70368\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"NEUROIMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Human Brain Mapping","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/hbm.70368","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NEUROIMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

脑磁图(MEG)提供了比脑电图(EEG)更高的空间分辨率来测量人类的听觉反应。然而,传统的低温MEG系统(SQUID-MEG)受到严重的技术限制,例如常规临床应用。幸运的是,新一代脑磁图传感器——光泵磁强计(OPMs)的发展弥补了这一差距,将脑电信号的可穿戴性与脑磁图信号采集的优势结合起来。我们的目的是评估它们在研究听觉错配加工方面的潜力。听觉错配负性(MMN)是一种表征良好的诱发成分,可通过双音序列的被动古怪范式观察到。脑电图和脑磁图已被广泛描述,并且是许多基于脑电图的临床应用的一部分,例如对意识障碍患者的评估。因此,MMN是评估OPM性能的一个相关候选。我们使用最近开发的氦- opm,这是在室温下工作的高动态范围MEG传感器。我们将其与低温SQUID-MEG和EEG在被动频率奇球范式下的性能进行了比较。结果显示,在所有模式下,MMN在受试者之间都具有显著的差异,并且模式之间具有高度的时间相似性。信噪比也相似,使用OPM系统检测显着的个体MMN(受试者内)等于或优于EEG。考虑到这里测试的OPM系统是一个仅由五个传感器组成的原型,这些结果是向结合了MEG和EEG优点的可穿戴式MEG迈出的有希望的一步。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

The Mismatch Negativity Compared: EEG, SQUID-MEG, and Novel 4Helium-OPMs

The Mismatch Negativity Compared: EEG, SQUID-MEG, and Novel 4Helium-OPMs

Magneto-encephalography (MEG) provides a higher spatial resolution than electro-encephalography (EEG) to measure human auditory responses. However, conventional cryogenic MEG systems (SQUID-MEG) suffer from severe technological restrictions limiting, for instance, routine clinical use. Fortunately, a new generation of MEG sensors, optically pumped magnetometers (OPMs), has been developed to bridge the gap, combining the wearability of EEG with the benefits of MEG signal acquisition. We aim to assess their potential for studying auditory mismatch processing. The auditory mismatch negativity (MMN) is a well-characterized evoked component observable using a passive oddball paradigm with two-tone sound sequences. It has been extensively described using both EEG and MEG and is part of many EEG-based clinical applications, such as the assessment of patients with disorders of consciousness. MMN is therefore a relevant candidate to evaluate OPM performance. We use recently developed Helium-OPMs, which are high dynamic range MEG sensors that operate at room temperature. We compare their performance with cryogenic SQUID-MEG and EEG in a passive frequency oddball paradigm. Results show a significant MMN across subjects in all modalities as well as a high temporal similarity between modalities. Signal-to-noise ratios were also similar, and detection of significant individual MMN (within-subjects) using the OPM system was equal to or better than EEG. Given that the OPM system tested here is a prototype comprised of only five sensors, these results are a promising step towards wearable MEG that combines the advantages of MEG and EEG.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Human Brain Mapping
Human Brain Mapping 医学-核医学
CiteScore
8.30
自引率
6.20%
发文量
401
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Human Brain Mapping publishes peer-reviewed basic, clinical, technical, and theoretical research in the interdisciplinary and rapidly expanding field of human brain mapping. The journal features research derived from non-invasive brain imaging modalities used to explore the spatial and temporal organization of the neural systems supporting human behavior. Imaging modalities of interest include positron emission tomography, event-related potentials, electro-and magnetoencephalography, magnetic resonance imaging, and single-photon emission tomography. Brain mapping research in both normal and clinical populations is encouraged. Article formats include Research Articles, Review Articles, Clinical Case Studies, and Technique, as well as Technological Developments, Theoretical Articles, and Synthetic Reviews. Technical advances, such as novel brain imaging methods, analyses for detecting or localizing neural activity, synergistic uses of multiple imaging modalities, and strategies for the design of behavioral paradigms and neural-systems modeling are of particular interest. The journal endorses the propagation of methodological standards and encourages database development in the field of human brain mapping.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信