机器学习方法表明,由地球系统模型产生的浮游植物生物量的大区域变化并不能反映对气候变化的现实反应

IF 5.5 2区 地球科学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Anand Gnanadesikan, Jingwen Liu, Sandupal Dutta, Brandon Feole, Faith McCarthy, John Qian
{"title":"机器学习方法表明,由地球系统模型产生的浮游植物生物量的大区域变化并不能反映对气候变化的现实反应","authors":"Anand Gnanadesikan,&nbsp;Jingwen Liu,&nbsp;Sandupal Dutta,&nbsp;Brandon Feole,&nbsp;Faith McCarthy,&nbsp;John Qian","doi":"10.1029/2025GB008761","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Surface phytoplankton biomass (measured in mol C m<sup>−3</sup>) represents a critical parameter within the Earth System that is measured from space and simulated in Earth System Models. Under climate change, the current generation of Earth System Models agrees that low-latitude biomass will decline and high-latitude biomass will increase. However, on a regional scale, the magnitude, phenology and spatial pattern of these changes are highly inconsistent across models. We use machine learning to investigate the sources of the divergence and evaluate the realism of the simulations. We train Random Forests driven by environmental drivers to simulate surface phytoplankton biomass under both pre-industrial control and SSP5-8.5 scenarios. Outside the Arctic, the bulk of the changes in biomass are driven by rearrangements in the spatiotemporal distribution of environmental predictors. Large regional changes in models, however, are associated either with unrealistically low pre-industrial levels of macronutrients or unrealistically strong responses to those macronutrients. Within the Arctic, relationships between environmental predictors and biomass change under global warming. While increased light drives increased biomass, the effect is largest in models with a high nutrient bias. Feeding inputs from an ensemble of models to an emulator trained on observations predicts observed biomass better than the ensemble of the models does, highlighting the fact that models do not produce the correct relationships between environmental predictors and biomass. However, this technique does not yield mechanistically consistent predictions of biomass under climate change. Skepticism of large regional changes in surface phytoplankton biomass produced by individual models is warranted.</p>","PeriodicalId":12729,"journal":{"name":"Global Biogeochemical Cycles","volume":"39 10","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Machine Learning Methods Suggest That Large Regional Changes in Phytoplankton Biomass Produced by Earth System Models Do Not Reflect Realistic Responses to Changing Climate\",\"authors\":\"Anand Gnanadesikan,&nbsp;Jingwen Liu,&nbsp;Sandupal Dutta,&nbsp;Brandon Feole,&nbsp;Faith McCarthy,&nbsp;John Qian\",\"doi\":\"10.1029/2025GB008761\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Surface phytoplankton biomass (measured in mol C m<sup>−3</sup>) represents a critical parameter within the Earth System that is measured from space and simulated in Earth System Models. Under climate change, the current generation of Earth System Models agrees that low-latitude biomass will decline and high-latitude biomass will increase. However, on a regional scale, the magnitude, phenology and spatial pattern of these changes are highly inconsistent across models. We use machine learning to investigate the sources of the divergence and evaluate the realism of the simulations. We train Random Forests driven by environmental drivers to simulate surface phytoplankton biomass under both pre-industrial control and SSP5-8.5 scenarios. Outside the Arctic, the bulk of the changes in biomass are driven by rearrangements in the spatiotemporal distribution of environmental predictors. Large regional changes in models, however, are associated either with unrealistically low pre-industrial levels of macronutrients or unrealistically strong responses to those macronutrients. Within the Arctic, relationships between environmental predictors and biomass change under global warming. While increased light drives increased biomass, the effect is largest in models with a high nutrient bias. Feeding inputs from an ensemble of models to an emulator trained on observations predicts observed biomass better than the ensemble of the models does, highlighting the fact that models do not produce the correct relationships between environmental predictors and biomass. However, this technique does not yield mechanistically consistent predictions of biomass under climate change. Skepticism of large regional changes in surface phytoplankton biomass produced by individual models is warranted.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12729,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Global Biogeochemical Cycles\",\"volume\":\"39 10\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Global Biogeochemical Cycles\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"89\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1029/2025GB008761\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"地球科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Biogeochemical Cycles","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1029/2025GB008761","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

地表浮游植物生物量(以mol C m−3为单位)是地球系统内的一个关键参数,可以从空间测量并在地球系统模型中进行模拟。在气候变化下,当前一代地球系统模型一致认为低纬度生物量将下降,高纬度生物量将增加。然而,在区域尺度上,这些变化的幅度、物候和空间格局在不同模式之间高度不一致。我们使用机器学习来研究分歧的来源并评估模拟的真实性。我们训练由环境驱动因素驱动的随机森林来模拟工业化前控制和SSP5-8.5情景下的表层浮游植物生物量。在北极以外,生物量的大部分变化是由环境预测因子时空分布的重新排列驱动的。然而,模式中的大区域变化要么与工业化前大量营养素水平低得不现实有关,要么与对这些大量营养素的反应强得不现实有关。在北极,全球变暖下环境预测因子与生物量变化之间的关系。虽然增加的光照驱动增加的生物量,但在高营养偏倚的模型中效果最大。将来自模型集合的输入输入到经过观测训练的仿真器中,可以比模型集合更好地预测观测到的生物量,这突出了一个事实,即模型不能产生环境预测因子与生物量之间的正确关系。然而,这种技术不能产生气候变化下生物质的力学一致的预测。对单个模式产生的地表浮游植物生物量的大区域变化的怀疑是有根据的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Machine Learning Methods Suggest That Large Regional Changes in Phytoplankton Biomass Produced by Earth System Models Do Not Reflect Realistic Responses to Changing Climate

Machine Learning Methods Suggest That Large Regional Changes in Phytoplankton Biomass Produced by Earth System Models Do Not Reflect Realistic Responses to Changing Climate

Surface phytoplankton biomass (measured in mol C m−3) represents a critical parameter within the Earth System that is measured from space and simulated in Earth System Models. Under climate change, the current generation of Earth System Models agrees that low-latitude biomass will decline and high-latitude biomass will increase. However, on a regional scale, the magnitude, phenology and spatial pattern of these changes are highly inconsistent across models. We use machine learning to investigate the sources of the divergence and evaluate the realism of the simulations. We train Random Forests driven by environmental drivers to simulate surface phytoplankton biomass under both pre-industrial control and SSP5-8.5 scenarios. Outside the Arctic, the bulk of the changes in biomass are driven by rearrangements in the spatiotemporal distribution of environmental predictors. Large regional changes in models, however, are associated either with unrealistically low pre-industrial levels of macronutrients or unrealistically strong responses to those macronutrients. Within the Arctic, relationships between environmental predictors and biomass change under global warming. While increased light drives increased biomass, the effect is largest in models with a high nutrient bias. Feeding inputs from an ensemble of models to an emulator trained on observations predicts observed biomass better than the ensemble of the models does, highlighting the fact that models do not produce the correct relationships between environmental predictors and biomass. However, this technique does not yield mechanistically consistent predictions of biomass under climate change. Skepticism of large regional changes in surface phytoplankton biomass produced by individual models is warranted.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Global Biogeochemical Cycles
Global Biogeochemical Cycles 环境科学-地球科学综合
CiteScore
8.90
自引率
7.70%
发文量
141
审稿时长
8-16 weeks
期刊介绍: Global Biogeochemical Cycles (GBC) features research on regional to global biogeochemical interactions, as well as more local studies that demonstrate fundamental implications for biogeochemical processing at regional or global scales. Published papers draw on a wide array of methods and knowledge and extend in time from the deep geologic past to recent historical and potential future interactions. This broad scope includes studies that elucidate human activities as interactive components of biogeochemical cycles and physical Earth Systems including climate. Authors are required to make their work accessible to a broad interdisciplinary range of scientists.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信