社区抗洪能力评估:一个创新的社会资本导向框架

IF 3 3区 环境科学与生态学 Q2 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Ezekiel Olatunji, David Proverbs, Chaminda Pathirage, Subashini Suresh, Olutayo Ebenezer Ekundayo, Jamie Cooper, Lucinda Capewell
{"title":"社区抗洪能力评估:一个创新的社会资本导向框架","authors":"Ezekiel Olatunji,&nbsp;David Proverbs,&nbsp;Chaminda Pathirage,&nbsp;Subashini Suresh,&nbsp;Olutayo Ebenezer Ekundayo,&nbsp;Jamie Cooper,&nbsp;Lucinda Capewell","doi":"10.1111/jfr3.70128","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Flood risk management (FRM) strategies in many developed countries increasingly focus on building flood resilience at property, community, and national levels. However, existing research on community flood resilience (CFR) has thus far inadequately addressed the social dynamics underpinning interactions among key resilience dimensions. Despite limited recognition of the social dimension, factors such as social capital and sociocultural dynamics remain insufficiently explored, warranting further investigation. This study employs a modified preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses (PRISMA) to critically review and synthesize research gaps, before presenting an innovative social capital oriented framework to evaluate CFR. While infrastructure, economic, environmental, human, and governance dimensions play significant roles, the proposed framework emphasizes the foundational role of social capital and sociocultural factors, including norms, values, and identities, in shaping resilience outcomes and actions. These factors influence the success or failure of resilience-building efforts, particularly in diverse, deprived communities, such as those with nonnative speaking populations. This innovative framework offers insights for multisectoral stakeholders, including flood risk managers, engineers, surveyors, property owners, and local authorities, to address persistent challenges in resilience-building activities and improve intervention outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":49294,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Flood Risk Management","volume":"18 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jfr3.70128","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluating Community Flood Resilience: An Innovative Social Capital Oriented Framework\",\"authors\":\"Ezekiel Olatunji,&nbsp;David Proverbs,&nbsp;Chaminda Pathirage,&nbsp;Subashini Suresh,&nbsp;Olutayo Ebenezer Ekundayo,&nbsp;Jamie Cooper,&nbsp;Lucinda Capewell\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/jfr3.70128\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Flood risk management (FRM) strategies in many developed countries increasingly focus on building flood resilience at property, community, and national levels. However, existing research on community flood resilience (CFR) has thus far inadequately addressed the social dynamics underpinning interactions among key resilience dimensions. Despite limited recognition of the social dimension, factors such as social capital and sociocultural dynamics remain insufficiently explored, warranting further investigation. This study employs a modified preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses (PRISMA) to critically review and synthesize research gaps, before presenting an innovative social capital oriented framework to evaluate CFR. While infrastructure, economic, environmental, human, and governance dimensions play significant roles, the proposed framework emphasizes the foundational role of social capital and sociocultural factors, including norms, values, and identities, in shaping resilience outcomes and actions. These factors influence the success or failure of resilience-building efforts, particularly in diverse, deprived communities, such as those with nonnative speaking populations. This innovative framework offers insights for multisectoral stakeholders, including flood risk managers, engineers, surveyors, property owners, and local authorities, to address persistent challenges in resilience-building activities and improve intervention outcomes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49294,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Flood Risk Management\",\"volume\":\"18 4\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jfr3.70128\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Flood Risk Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jfr3.70128\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Flood Risk Management","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jfr3.70128","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

许多发达国家的洪水风险管理(FRM)战略越来越注重在财产、社区和国家层面建立抗洪能力。然而,现有的社区洪水恢复力(CFR)研究迄今尚未充分解决支撑关键恢复力维度之间相互作用的社会动态。尽管对社会层面的认识有限,但社会资本和社会文化动态等因素仍未得到充分探讨,需要进一步调查。本研究采用改良的首选报告项目进行系统回顾和荟萃分析(PRISMA),批判性地回顾和综合研究差距,然后提出了一个创新的社会资本导向的框架来评估CFR。虽然基础设施、经济、环境、人文和治理维度发挥着重要作用,但拟议的框架强调社会资本和社会文化因素(包括规范、价值观和身份)在塑造韧性结果和行动方面的基础作用。这些因素影响着恢复力建设工作的成败,特别是在不同的贫困社区,如非母语人口社区。这一创新框架为包括洪水风险管理者、工程师、测量师、业主和地方当局在内的多部门利益攸关方提供了见解,以应对韧性建设活动中持续存在的挑战,并改善干预成果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Evaluating Community Flood Resilience: An Innovative Social Capital Oriented Framework

Evaluating Community Flood Resilience: An Innovative Social Capital Oriented Framework

Flood risk management (FRM) strategies in many developed countries increasingly focus on building flood resilience at property, community, and national levels. However, existing research on community flood resilience (CFR) has thus far inadequately addressed the social dynamics underpinning interactions among key resilience dimensions. Despite limited recognition of the social dimension, factors such as social capital and sociocultural dynamics remain insufficiently explored, warranting further investigation. This study employs a modified preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses (PRISMA) to critically review and synthesize research gaps, before presenting an innovative social capital oriented framework to evaluate CFR. While infrastructure, economic, environmental, human, and governance dimensions play significant roles, the proposed framework emphasizes the foundational role of social capital and sociocultural factors, including norms, values, and identities, in shaping resilience outcomes and actions. These factors influence the success or failure of resilience-building efforts, particularly in diverse, deprived communities, such as those with nonnative speaking populations. This innovative framework offers insights for multisectoral stakeholders, including flood risk managers, engineers, surveyors, property owners, and local authorities, to address persistent challenges in resilience-building activities and improve intervention outcomes.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Flood Risk Management
Journal of Flood Risk Management ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES-WATER RESOURCES
CiteScore
8.40
自引率
7.30%
发文量
93
审稿时长
12 months
期刊介绍: Journal of Flood Risk Management provides an international platform for knowledge sharing in all areas related to flood risk. Its explicit aim is to disseminate ideas across the range of disciplines where flood related research is carried out and it provides content ranging from leading edge academic papers to applied content with the practitioner in mind. Readers and authors come from a wide background and include hydrologists, meteorologists, geographers, geomorphologists, conservationists, civil engineers, social scientists, policy makers, insurers and practitioners. They share an interest in managing the complex interactions between the many skills and disciplines that underpin the management of flood risk across the world.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信