空气污染管制:中国大陆、欧盟及美国VOC法规之比较分析

IF 4.3 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY
Indoor air Pub Date : 2025-09-26 DOI:10.1155/ina/6743635
C. K. Law, Savannah Y. T. Lai, Joseph H. K. Lai
{"title":"空气污染管制:中国大陆、欧盟及美国VOC法规之比较分析","authors":"C. K. Law,&nbsp;Savannah Y. T. Lai,&nbsp;Joseph H. K. Lai","doi":"10.1155/ina/6743635","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Air pollution, especially the rising ground-level ozone (O<sub>3</sub>) levels, poses a critical global challenge to public health and environmental sustainability. Volatile organic compounds (VOCs), which are key precursors to O<sub>3</sub> formation, are primarily emitted from various household chemical products. Given the lack of a thorough understanding of the current regulatory control on VOC emissions and the need to identify ways to curb these emissions, a comparative analysis was conducted on the VOC regulations across three major economies: Mainland China, the European Union (EU), and the United States. The analysis reveals distinct regulatory frameworks and approaches: (i) the United States exemplifies a robust control framework characterized by detailed product categorization, stringent VOC limits, and many control parameters; (ii) the EU adopts a relatively streamlined approach, primarily targeting certain types of architectural paints and relying on ecolabel for specific cleaning products; and (iii) Mainland China employs a broad regulatory approach, permitting a range of solvent-borne products with comparatively lenient VOC limits, while tightening penalty mechanisms and broadening the scope of regulated entities. Comparatively, the EU and Mainland China place less emphasis on governing consumer products such as air fresheners, while the United States and Mainland China implement the polluter-pays principle, including VOC taxes. In addition to forging international collaboration to enhance cross-border regulatory control of VOCs, future work is needed to explore establishing stricter emission standards, implementing comprehensive bans on specific high-VOC products, and providing financial incentives and technological upgrades for the transition to low-VOC alternatives.</p>","PeriodicalId":13529,"journal":{"name":"Indoor air","volume":"2025 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1155/ina/6743635","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Air Pollution Control: Comparative Analysis of VOC Regulations Across Mainland China, the EU, and the US\",\"authors\":\"C. K. Law,&nbsp;Savannah Y. T. Lai,&nbsp;Joseph H. K. Lai\",\"doi\":\"10.1155/ina/6743635\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Air pollution, especially the rising ground-level ozone (O<sub>3</sub>) levels, poses a critical global challenge to public health and environmental sustainability. Volatile organic compounds (VOCs), which are key precursors to O<sub>3</sub> formation, are primarily emitted from various household chemical products. Given the lack of a thorough understanding of the current regulatory control on VOC emissions and the need to identify ways to curb these emissions, a comparative analysis was conducted on the VOC regulations across three major economies: Mainland China, the European Union (EU), and the United States. The analysis reveals distinct regulatory frameworks and approaches: (i) the United States exemplifies a robust control framework characterized by detailed product categorization, stringent VOC limits, and many control parameters; (ii) the EU adopts a relatively streamlined approach, primarily targeting certain types of architectural paints and relying on ecolabel for specific cleaning products; and (iii) Mainland China employs a broad regulatory approach, permitting a range of solvent-borne products with comparatively lenient VOC limits, while tightening penalty mechanisms and broadening the scope of regulated entities. Comparatively, the EU and Mainland China place less emphasis on governing consumer products such as air fresheners, while the United States and Mainland China implement the polluter-pays principle, including VOC taxes. In addition to forging international collaboration to enhance cross-border regulatory control of VOCs, future work is needed to explore establishing stricter emission standards, implementing comprehensive bans on specific high-VOC products, and providing financial incentives and technological upgrades for the transition to low-VOC alternatives.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13529,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Indoor air\",\"volume\":\"2025 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1155/ina/6743635\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Indoor air\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1155/ina/6743635\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indoor air","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1155/ina/6743635","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

空气污染,特别是地面臭氧(O3)水平的上升,对公众健康和环境可持续性构成了重大的全球挑战。挥发性有机化合物(VOCs)是臭氧形成的关键前体,主要来自各种家用化学产品。鉴于缺乏对现行规管挥发性有机化合物排放的全面了解,以及需要找出遏制这些排放的方法,我们对三个主要经济体(中国内地、欧盟和美国)的挥发性有机化合物法规进行了比较分析。分析揭示了不同的监管框架和方法:(i)美国体现了一个强大的控制框架,其特点是详细的产品分类、严格的VOC限制和许多控制参数;(ii)欧盟采用相对简化的方法,主要针对某些类型的建筑涂料,并在特定清洁产品上使用生态标签;以及(iii)中国内地采用广泛的规管方法,允许一系列溶剂性产品,而VOC限值相对宽松,同时收紧惩罚机制,扩大受规管实体的范围。相比之下,欧盟和中国内地对空气清新剂等消费品的监管力度较小,而美国和中国内地则实行污染者自付原则,包括VOC税。除了加强国际合作以加强对挥发性有机化合物的跨境监管外,未来的工作还需要探讨建立更严格的排放标准,对特定的高挥发性有机化合物产品实施全面禁令,并为向低挥发性有机化合物替代品过渡提供财政激励和技术升级。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Air Pollution Control: Comparative Analysis of VOC Regulations Across Mainland China, the EU, and the US

Air Pollution Control: Comparative Analysis of VOC Regulations Across Mainland China, the EU, and the US

Air pollution, especially the rising ground-level ozone (O3) levels, poses a critical global challenge to public health and environmental sustainability. Volatile organic compounds (VOCs), which are key precursors to O3 formation, are primarily emitted from various household chemical products. Given the lack of a thorough understanding of the current regulatory control on VOC emissions and the need to identify ways to curb these emissions, a comparative analysis was conducted on the VOC regulations across three major economies: Mainland China, the European Union (EU), and the United States. The analysis reveals distinct regulatory frameworks and approaches: (i) the United States exemplifies a robust control framework characterized by detailed product categorization, stringent VOC limits, and many control parameters; (ii) the EU adopts a relatively streamlined approach, primarily targeting certain types of architectural paints and relying on ecolabel for specific cleaning products; and (iii) Mainland China employs a broad regulatory approach, permitting a range of solvent-borne products with comparatively lenient VOC limits, while tightening penalty mechanisms and broadening the scope of regulated entities. Comparatively, the EU and Mainland China place less emphasis on governing consumer products such as air fresheners, while the United States and Mainland China implement the polluter-pays principle, including VOC taxes. In addition to forging international collaboration to enhance cross-border regulatory control of VOCs, future work is needed to explore establishing stricter emission standards, implementing comprehensive bans on specific high-VOC products, and providing financial incentives and technological upgrades for the transition to low-VOC alternatives.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Indoor air
Indoor air 环境科学-工程:环境
CiteScore
10.80
自引率
10.30%
发文量
175
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The quality of the environment within buildings is a topic of major importance for public health. Indoor Air provides a location for reporting original research results in the broad area defined by the indoor environment of non-industrial buildings. An international journal with multidisciplinary content, Indoor Air publishes papers reflecting the broad categories of interest in this field: health effects; thermal comfort; monitoring and modelling; source characterization; ventilation and other environmental control techniques. The research results present the basic information to allow designers, building owners, and operators to provide a healthy and comfortable environment for building occupants, as well as giving medical practitioners information on how to deal with illnesses related to the indoor environment.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信