Wenyu Xu, Yongshan Xu, Jiyuan Yao, Weihong Zhu, Haitao Wang
{"title":"半自然生境对不同强度农业鸟类占用的影响:多物种分析","authors":"Wenyu Xu, Yongshan Xu, Jiyuan Yao, Weihong Zhu, Haitao Wang","doi":"10.1111/ddi.70094","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Aim</h3>\n \n <p>Agriculture is a primary factor underlying worldwide declines in biodiversity. Incorporating semi-natural habitat features within agricultural landscapes is considered an effective strategy for mitigating the biodiversity loss associated with agricultural intensification. However, few studies have investigated whether and how the biodiversity-supporting capacity of semi-natural habitats varies across landscape-level agricultural intensity gradients.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Location</h3>\n \n <p>Agroecosystems of Central-Eastern Jilin, China.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>The 84 passive acoustic monitors were deployed across agricultural intensity gradients for 30 days, collecting avian vocalisation data from 04:00 to 07:00 on alternate days. The collected avian vocalisation data were processed using BirdNET (an AI-based sound analysis tool) and were complemented by expert verification. We employed multi-species occupancy models to estimate bird occupancy rates, with subsequent analysis examining the relative influence of semi-natural habitats on these rates under different agricultural intensity gradients.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Our results indicated that bird occupancy probabilities were higher in low- and middle-intensity agricultural landscapes compared to high-intensity agricultural landscapes, particularly for habitat edge-dependent insectivores. The supportive role of semi-natural habitats on bird occupancy was strongest in middle-intensity agriculture, with insectivores benefiting most significantly. Specifically, enhancing both the number of semi-natural habitat types and woodland coverage under middle-intensity agricultural practices would benefit various bird guilds. Increased waterbody coverage within farmland ecosystems positively impacted insectivorous birds regardless of agricultural intensity. Additionally, open-habitat species benefit from diversified crop cultivation patterns in low-to-middle intensity systems.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Main Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Our results demonstrate that enhancing bird occupancy rates by semi-natural habitats depends on both the agricultural intensity context and the functional group. Our findings provide critical evidence for biodiversity conservation strategies in agricultural ecosystems and contribute to reducing geographical biases in agro-ecological research on avifauna.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":51018,"journal":{"name":"Diversity and Distributions","volume":"31 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/ddi.70094","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effects of Semi-Natural Habitats on Bird Occupancy in Different Intensity Agriculture: A Multi-Species Approach\",\"authors\":\"Wenyu Xu, Yongshan Xu, Jiyuan Yao, Weihong Zhu, Haitao Wang\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/ddi.70094\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Aim</h3>\\n \\n <p>Agriculture is a primary factor underlying worldwide declines in biodiversity. Incorporating semi-natural habitat features within agricultural landscapes is considered an effective strategy for mitigating the biodiversity loss associated with agricultural intensification. However, few studies have investigated whether and how the biodiversity-supporting capacity of semi-natural habitats varies across landscape-level agricultural intensity gradients.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Location</h3>\\n \\n <p>Agroecosystems of Central-Eastern Jilin, China.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>The 84 passive acoustic monitors were deployed across agricultural intensity gradients for 30 days, collecting avian vocalisation data from 04:00 to 07:00 on alternate days. The collected avian vocalisation data were processed using BirdNET (an AI-based sound analysis tool) and were complemented by expert verification. We employed multi-species occupancy models to estimate bird occupancy rates, with subsequent analysis examining the relative influence of semi-natural habitats on these rates under different agricultural intensity gradients.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>Our results indicated that bird occupancy probabilities were higher in low- and middle-intensity agricultural landscapes compared to high-intensity agricultural landscapes, particularly for habitat edge-dependent insectivores. The supportive role of semi-natural habitats on bird occupancy was strongest in middle-intensity agriculture, with insectivores benefiting most significantly. Specifically, enhancing both the number of semi-natural habitat types and woodland coverage under middle-intensity agricultural practices would benefit various bird guilds. Increased waterbody coverage within farmland ecosystems positively impacted insectivorous birds regardless of agricultural intensity. Additionally, open-habitat species benefit from diversified crop cultivation patterns in low-to-middle intensity systems.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Main Conclusions</h3>\\n \\n <p>Our results demonstrate that enhancing bird occupancy rates by semi-natural habitats depends on both the agricultural intensity context and the functional group. Our findings provide critical evidence for biodiversity conservation strategies in agricultural ecosystems and contribute to reducing geographical biases in agro-ecological research on avifauna.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51018,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Diversity and Distributions\",\"volume\":\"31 9\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/ddi.70094\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Diversity and Distributions\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ddi.70094\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diversity and Distributions","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ddi.70094","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
Effects of Semi-Natural Habitats on Bird Occupancy in Different Intensity Agriculture: A Multi-Species Approach
Aim
Agriculture is a primary factor underlying worldwide declines in biodiversity. Incorporating semi-natural habitat features within agricultural landscapes is considered an effective strategy for mitigating the biodiversity loss associated with agricultural intensification. However, few studies have investigated whether and how the biodiversity-supporting capacity of semi-natural habitats varies across landscape-level agricultural intensity gradients.
Location
Agroecosystems of Central-Eastern Jilin, China.
Methods
The 84 passive acoustic monitors were deployed across agricultural intensity gradients for 30 days, collecting avian vocalisation data from 04:00 to 07:00 on alternate days. The collected avian vocalisation data were processed using BirdNET (an AI-based sound analysis tool) and were complemented by expert verification. We employed multi-species occupancy models to estimate bird occupancy rates, with subsequent analysis examining the relative influence of semi-natural habitats on these rates under different agricultural intensity gradients.
Results
Our results indicated that bird occupancy probabilities were higher in low- and middle-intensity agricultural landscapes compared to high-intensity agricultural landscapes, particularly for habitat edge-dependent insectivores. The supportive role of semi-natural habitats on bird occupancy was strongest in middle-intensity agriculture, with insectivores benefiting most significantly. Specifically, enhancing both the number of semi-natural habitat types and woodland coverage under middle-intensity agricultural practices would benefit various bird guilds. Increased waterbody coverage within farmland ecosystems positively impacted insectivorous birds regardless of agricultural intensity. Additionally, open-habitat species benefit from diversified crop cultivation patterns in low-to-middle intensity systems.
Main Conclusions
Our results demonstrate that enhancing bird occupancy rates by semi-natural habitats depends on both the agricultural intensity context and the functional group. Our findings provide critical evidence for biodiversity conservation strategies in agricultural ecosystems and contribute to reducing geographical biases in agro-ecological research on avifauna.
期刊介绍:
Diversity and Distributions is a journal of conservation biogeography. We publish papers that deal with the application of biogeographical principles, theories, and analyses (being those concerned with the distributional dynamics of taxa and assemblages) to problems concerning the conservation of biodiversity. We no longer consider papers the sole aim of which is to describe or analyze patterns of biodiversity or to elucidate processes that generate biodiversity.