深度学习检测身体成分及其在胰腺手术术后并发症中的作用

Ahad M. Azimuddin, Andrea M. Meinders, Jerica Podrat, Kelvin C. Allenson, Joy Yoo, Enshuo Hsu, Linda W. Moore, Kayla Callaway, Nestor F. Esnaola, Elijah Rockers, Atiya F. Dhala
{"title":"深度学习检测身体成分及其在胰腺手术术后并发症中的作用","authors":"Ahad M. Azimuddin,&nbsp;Andrea M. Meinders,&nbsp;Jerica Podrat,&nbsp;Kelvin C. Allenson,&nbsp;Joy Yoo,&nbsp;Enshuo Hsu,&nbsp;Linda W. Moore,&nbsp;Kayla Callaway,&nbsp;Nestor F. Esnaola,&nbsp;Elijah Rockers,&nbsp;Atiya F. Dhala","doi":"10.1002/rco2.70013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Variance in skeletal muscle area (SMA), visceral adipose tissue (VAT) and subcutaneous adipose tissue (SAT) negatively impacts outcomes after pancreas surgery. We aim to incorporate an existing deep learning algorithm automating body composition segmentation from computed tomography (CT) for accurate and rapid risk identification.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>We conducted a retrospective study of patients having pancreatic surgery at a high-volume centre (2016–2021). Using a deep learning algorithm, we analysed preoperative CT images at the L3 level for SMA, VAT, SAT and IMAT (AutoMATiCA, Cambridge, MA, USA). Two board-certified radiologists validated the analysis. Skeletal muscle index (SMI), VAT and VAT/SAT ratio were calculated. We then evaluated the incidence of pancreas surgery-specific, pulmonary, noninfectious and infectious outcomes.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>We reviewed 158 patients: median (IQR) age 67.6 (61.6, 75.3) years; female (52.5%); pancreatic cancer diagnoses (65.8%); and Whipple procedure (81%). Automated body composition calculation time for all patients was 553 s. Patients experiencing composite sepsis complications had higher VAT (193.7 [IQR 132.7, 249.7] vs. 146.2 [IQR 87.3, 220.5], <i>p</i> = 0.029). Additionally, patients experiencing composite infectious complications had higher VAT (193.7 [IQR 133.4, 277.5] vs. 143.1 [IQR 72.2, 202.8], <i>p</i> = 0.041). VAT was also higher in patients with noninfectious complications (274.9 [IQR 228.0, 329.8] vs. 148.7 [IQR 90.9, 221.0]; <i>p</i> = 0.020). Other anthropomorphic features, such as SMA, SAT and IMAT, did not have any relation to postoperative composite outcomes.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Higher visceral adipose tissue was associated with worse outcomes after pancreas surgery. Deep learning applied to CT scans may be valuable for identifying at-risk body compositions associated with adverse surgical outcomes. Further studies are needed to confirm these findings.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":73544,"journal":{"name":"JCSM rapid communications","volume":"8 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/rco2.70013","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Deep Learning to Detect Body Composition and Its Role in Developing Postoperative Pancreatic Surgery Complications\",\"authors\":\"Ahad M. Azimuddin,&nbsp;Andrea M. Meinders,&nbsp;Jerica Podrat,&nbsp;Kelvin C. Allenson,&nbsp;Joy Yoo,&nbsp;Enshuo Hsu,&nbsp;Linda W. Moore,&nbsp;Kayla Callaway,&nbsp;Nestor F. Esnaola,&nbsp;Elijah Rockers,&nbsp;Atiya F. Dhala\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/rco2.70013\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Background</h3>\\n \\n <p>Variance in skeletal muscle area (SMA), visceral adipose tissue (VAT) and subcutaneous adipose tissue (SAT) negatively impacts outcomes after pancreas surgery. We aim to incorporate an existing deep learning algorithm automating body composition segmentation from computed tomography (CT) for accurate and rapid risk identification.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>We conducted a retrospective study of patients having pancreatic surgery at a high-volume centre (2016–2021). Using a deep learning algorithm, we analysed preoperative CT images at the L3 level for SMA, VAT, SAT and IMAT (AutoMATiCA, Cambridge, MA, USA). Two board-certified radiologists validated the analysis. Skeletal muscle index (SMI), VAT and VAT/SAT ratio were calculated. We then evaluated the incidence of pancreas surgery-specific, pulmonary, noninfectious and infectious outcomes.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>We reviewed 158 patients: median (IQR) age 67.6 (61.6, 75.3) years; female (52.5%); pancreatic cancer diagnoses (65.8%); and Whipple procedure (81%). Automated body composition calculation time for all patients was 553 s. Patients experiencing composite sepsis complications had higher VAT (193.7 [IQR 132.7, 249.7] vs. 146.2 [IQR 87.3, 220.5], <i>p</i> = 0.029). Additionally, patients experiencing composite infectious complications had higher VAT (193.7 [IQR 133.4, 277.5] vs. 143.1 [IQR 72.2, 202.8], <i>p</i> = 0.041). VAT was also higher in patients with noninfectious complications (274.9 [IQR 228.0, 329.8] vs. 148.7 [IQR 90.9, 221.0]; <i>p</i> = 0.020). Other anthropomorphic features, such as SMA, SAT and IMAT, did not have any relation to postoperative composite outcomes.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\\n \\n <p>Higher visceral adipose tissue was associated with worse outcomes after pancreas surgery. Deep learning applied to CT scans may be valuable for identifying at-risk body compositions associated with adverse surgical outcomes. Further studies are needed to confirm these findings.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73544,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JCSM rapid communications\",\"volume\":\"8 2\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/rco2.70013\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JCSM rapid communications\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/rco2.70013\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JCSM rapid communications","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/rco2.70013","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:骨骼肌面积(SMA)、内脏脂肪组织(VAT)和皮下脂肪组织(SAT)的差异会对胰腺手术后的预后产生负面影响。我们的目标是结合现有的深度学习算法,自动从计算机断层扫描(CT)中分割身体成分,以准确快速地识别风险。方法:我们对2016-2021年在大容量中心进行胰腺手术的患者进行回顾性研究。使用深度学习算法,我们分析了SMA、VAT、SAT和IMAT (AutoMATiCA, Cambridge, MA, USA)的L3层术前CT图像。两名委员会认证的放射科医生证实了分析结果。计算骨骼肌指数(SMI)、VAT和VAT/SAT比值。然后我们评估胰腺手术特异性、肺部、非感染性和感染性结局的发生率。结果158例患者:中位(IQR)年龄67.6(61.6,75.3)岁;女性(52.5%);胰腺癌诊断(65.8%);惠普尔手术(81%)。所有患者的自动体成分计算时间为553秒。合并脓毒症并发症的患者VAT较高(193.7 [IQR 132.7, 249.7] vs. 146.2 [IQR 87.3, 220.5], p = 0.029)。此外,出现复合感染并发症的患者VAT更高(193.7 [IQR 133.4, 277.5]比143.1 [IQR 72.2, 202.8], p = 0.041)。非感染性并发症患者的VAT也更高(274.9 [IQR 228.0, 329.8]比148.7 [IQR 90.9, 221.0]; p = 0.020)。其他拟人化特征,如SMA、SAT和IMAT,与术后综合结果没有任何关系。结论胰腺手术后较高的内脏脂肪组织与较差的预后相关。将深度学习应用于CT扫描对于识别与不良手术结果相关的高危身体成分可能很有价值。需要进一步的研究来证实这些发现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Deep Learning to Detect Body Composition and Its Role in Developing Postoperative Pancreatic Surgery Complications

Deep Learning to Detect Body Composition and Its Role in Developing Postoperative Pancreatic Surgery Complications

Background

Variance in skeletal muscle area (SMA), visceral adipose tissue (VAT) and subcutaneous adipose tissue (SAT) negatively impacts outcomes after pancreas surgery. We aim to incorporate an existing deep learning algorithm automating body composition segmentation from computed tomography (CT) for accurate and rapid risk identification.

Methods

We conducted a retrospective study of patients having pancreatic surgery at a high-volume centre (2016–2021). Using a deep learning algorithm, we analysed preoperative CT images at the L3 level for SMA, VAT, SAT and IMAT (AutoMATiCA, Cambridge, MA, USA). Two board-certified radiologists validated the analysis. Skeletal muscle index (SMI), VAT and VAT/SAT ratio were calculated. We then evaluated the incidence of pancreas surgery-specific, pulmonary, noninfectious and infectious outcomes.

Results

We reviewed 158 patients: median (IQR) age 67.6 (61.6, 75.3) years; female (52.5%); pancreatic cancer diagnoses (65.8%); and Whipple procedure (81%). Automated body composition calculation time for all patients was 553 s. Patients experiencing composite sepsis complications had higher VAT (193.7 [IQR 132.7, 249.7] vs. 146.2 [IQR 87.3, 220.5], p = 0.029). Additionally, patients experiencing composite infectious complications had higher VAT (193.7 [IQR 133.4, 277.5] vs. 143.1 [IQR 72.2, 202.8], p = 0.041). VAT was also higher in patients with noninfectious complications (274.9 [IQR 228.0, 329.8] vs. 148.7 [IQR 90.9, 221.0]; p = 0.020). Other anthropomorphic features, such as SMA, SAT and IMAT, did not have any relation to postoperative composite outcomes.

Conclusions

Higher visceral adipose tissue was associated with worse outcomes after pancreas surgery. Deep learning applied to CT scans may be valuable for identifying at-risk body compositions associated with adverse surgical outcomes. Further studies are needed to confirm these findings.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
10 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信