P. Romero-Vidal, J. M. Barbosa, G. Blanco, F. Hiraldo, M. Carrete, J. L. Tella
{"title":"仅靠栖息地保护是不够的:哥斯达黎加鹦鹉在改变的景观中茁壮成长,但仍然容易受到偷猎","authors":"P. Romero-Vidal, J. M. Barbosa, G. Blanco, F. Hiraldo, M. Carrete, J. L. Tella","doi":"10.1111/ddi.70084","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Aim</h3>\n \n <p>Human population growth and resource overexploitation have induced major changes in global biodiversity. Costa Rica, with 26% of its land area protected, is often cited as a model of environmental conservation. However, conservation efforts have largely focused on habitat preservation, while overharvesting remains an unquantified factor in wildlife decline. Here, we used parrots as a model to assess changes in their presence, abundance and richness in relation to habitat transformation, while also quantifying for the first time the poaching pressure they face, driven by the demand for them as domestic pets.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Location</h3>\n \n <p>Costa Rica.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>We conducted a broad-scale survey across the country to simultaneously obtain data on the relative abundance of parrots in different habitats and estimate poaching pressure by recording illegal household pets and parrots seized by authorities. Then, we related the presence, abundance and richness of parrots to habitat characteristics using two complementary approaches (i.e., patches along transects and points where we had detected at least one individual) and examined whether certain species were poached with greater intensity than others.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>We found that parrot presence, abundance and richness tend to decrease in modified habitats, particularly agricultural areas, although this trend reverses in human settlements. On the other hand, our surveys revealed near-ubiquitous ownership of native parrots illegally kept as pets, which were recorded in 86.6% of the sampled localities and in 81.5% of the surveyed houses. Several threatened macaw and Amazon species were poached more than expected attending to their abundances in the wild.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Main Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Although our methodology does not allow for a direct comparison of the impact of habitat loss and poaching, our findings suggest that parrot communities are affected by habitat changes while they can tolerate certain levels of habitat transformation, such as urbanisation. On the other hand, parrot species preferred by people still face intense poaching pressure for the domestic pet trade. Focusing conservation efforts solely on habitat protection will be insufficient to preserve these critical components of tropical ecosystems. More effective measures are needed to curb poaching and address the deeply ingrained cultural tradition of keeping wild parrots as pets.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":51018,"journal":{"name":"Diversity and Distributions","volume":"31 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/ddi.70084","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Habitat Protection Alone Is Insufficient: Costa Rican Parrots Thrive in Altered Landscapes but Remain Vulnerable to Poaching\",\"authors\":\"P. Romero-Vidal, J. M. Barbosa, G. Blanco, F. Hiraldo, M. Carrete, J. L. Tella\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/ddi.70084\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Aim</h3>\\n \\n <p>Human population growth and resource overexploitation have induced major changes in global biodiversity. Costa Rica, with 26% of its land area protected, is often cited as a model of environmental conservation. However, conservation efforts have largely focused on habitat preservation, while overharvesting remains an unquantified factor in wildlife decline. Here, we used parrots as a model to assess changes in their presence, abundance and richness in relation to habitat transformation, while also quantifying for the first time the poaching pressure they face, driven by the demand for them as domestic pets.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Location</h3>\\n \\n <p>Costa Rica.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>We conducted a broad-scale survey across the country to simultaneously obtain data on the relative abundance of parrots in different habitats and estimate poaching pressure by recording illegal household pets and parrots seized by authorities. Then, we related the presence, abundance and richness of parrots to habitat characteristics using two complementary approaches (i.e., patches along transects and points where we had detected at least one individual) and examined whether certain species were poached with greater intensity than others.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>We found that parrot presence, abundance and richness tend to decrease in modified habitats, particularly agricultural areas, although this trend reverses in human settlements. On the other hand, our surveys revealed near-ubiquitous ownership of native parrots illegally kept as pets, which were recorded in 86.6% of the sampled localities and in 81.5% of the surveyed houses. Several threatened macaw and Amazon species were poached more than expected attending to their abundances in the wild.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Main Conclusions</h3>\\n \\n <p>Although our methodology does not allow for a direct comparison of the impact of habitat loss and poaching, our findings suggest that parrot communities are affected by habitat changes while they can tolerate certain levels of habitat transformation, such as urbanisation. On the other hand, parrot species preferred by people still face intense poaching pressure for the domestic pet trade. Focusing conservation efforts solely on habitat protection will be insufficient to preserve these critical components of tropical ecosystems. More effective measures are needed to curb poaching and address the deeply ingrained cultural tradition of keeping wild parrots as pets.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51018,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Diversity and Distributions\",\"volume\":\"31 9\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/ddi.70084\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Diversity and Distributions\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ddi.70084\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diversity and Distributions","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ddi.70084","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
Habitat Protection Alone Is Insufficient: Costa Rican Parrots Thrive in Altered Landscapes but Remain Vulnerable to Poaching
Aim
Human population growth and resource overexploitation have induced major changes in global biodiversity. Costa Rica, with 26% of its land area protected, is often cited as a model of environmental conservation. However, conservation efforts have largely focused on habitat preservation, while overharvesting remains an unquantified factor in wildlife decline. Here, we used parrots as a model to assess changes in their presence, abundance and richness in relation to habitat transformation, while also quantifying for the first time the poaching pressure they face, driven by the demand for them as domestic pets.
Location
Costa Rica.
Methods
We conducted a broad-scale survey across the country to simultaneously obtain data on the relative abundance of parrots in different habitats and estimate poaching pressure by recording illegal household pets and parrots seized by authorities. Then, we related the presence, abundance and richness of parrots to habitat characteristics using two complementary approaches (i.e., patches along transects and points where we had detected at least one individual) and examined whether certain species were poached with greater intensity than others.
Results
We found that parrot presence, abundance and richness tend to decrease in modified habitats, particularly agricultural areas, although this trend reverses in human settlements. On the other hand, our surveys revealed near-ubiquitous ownership of native parrots illegally kept as pets, which were recorded in 86.6% of the sampled localities and in 81.5% of the surveyed houses. Several threatened macaw and Amazon species were poached more than expected attending to their abundances in the wild.
Main Conclusions
Although our methodology does not allow for a direct comparison of the impact of habitat loss and poaching, our findings suggest that parrot communities are affected by habitat changes while they can tolerate certain levels of habitat transformation, such as urbanisation. On the other hand, parrot species preferred by people still face intense poaching pressure for the domestic pet trade. Focusing conservation efforts solely on habitat protection will be insufficient to preserve these critical components of tropical ecosystems. More effective measures are needed to curb poaching and address the deeply ingrained cultural tradition of keeping wild parrots as pets.
期刊介绍:
Diversity and Distributions is a journal of conservation biogeography. We publish papers that deal with the application of biogeographical principles, theories, and analyses (being those concerned with the distributional dynamics of taxa and assemblages) to problems concerning the conservation of biodiversity. We no longer consider papers the sole aim of which is to describe or analyze patterns of biodiversity or to elucidate processes that generate biodiversity.