急诊医师的注意力评价视觉运动反应时间关系

IF 2.4 4区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Damla Anbarli Metin, Bahri Oğulcan Tabak, Nurbanu Akdogan, Gizem Mermerkaya, Seref Emre Atis
{"title":"急诊医师的注意力评价视觉运动反应时间关系","authors":"Damla Anbarli Metin,&nbsp;Bahri Oğulcan Tabak,&nbsp;Nurbanu Akdogan,&nbsp;Gizem Mermerkaya,&nbsp;Seref Emre Atis","doi":"10.1155/ijcp/7466778","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><b>Objective:</b> Emergency physicians require exceptionally high perceptual and cognitive performance during their shifts. Visuomotor reaction time (VMRT) serves as a key indicator of this performance. In the study, we examined the relationship between shift duration and VMRT in physicians working in the emergency department.</p><p><b>Materials and Methods:</b> The cross-sectional study was conducted among emergency physicians working 24-h shifts. Their VMRTs were measured using the FitLight Trainer at 0, 8, 12, 16, and 24 h into the shift.</p><p><b>Results:</b> The study included 29 physicians. 11 (37.9%) of the physicians included in the study were female, and the median age was 28.00 (25.50–31.00). A significant difference was found when the VMRTs of the measurements made at the 0<sup>th</sup> hour, 8<sup>th</sup> hour, 12<sup>th</sup> hour, 16<sup>th</sup> hour, and 24<sup>th</sup> hour of the shift were compared (<i>p</i> = 0.035). When the post hoc analyses for the groups that created this difference were examined, the VMRT at 0 hour was 0.362 s [0.332–0.402], VMRT at 8 h was 0.358 s [0.328–382], VMRT at 12 hour was 0.353 s [0.319–0.391], VMRT at 16 hour was 0.349 s [0.319–0.383], and VMRT at 24 hour was 0.362 s [0.334–0.393]. While there was a significant difference between VMRT at 0, 8, 12, and 16 h (<i>p</i> = 0.005, <i>p</i> = 0.003, and <i>p</i> = 0.009, respectively), there was no significant difference between VMRT at 24 hour (<i>p</i> = 0.252, <i>p</i> = 0.776, and <i>p</i> = 0.764, respectively). There was no significant difference between shifts at 8, 12, and 16 h (<i>p</i> = 0.776 and <i>p</i> = 0.764, respectively).</p><p><b>Conclusion:</b> The VMRT decreased 16 h of physicians’ shift, after which physicians showed improved attention. Notably, there were no differences between the VMRT at 0 and 24 h.</p>","PeriodicalId":13782,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Clinical Practice","volume":"2025 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1155/ijcp/7466778","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessment of Attention in Emergency Physicians; Visuomotor Reaction Time Relationship\",\"authors\":\"Damla Anbarli Metin,&nbsp;Bahri Oğulcan Tabak,&nbsp;Nurbanu Akdogan,&nbsp;Gizem Mermerkaya,&nbsp;Seref Emre Atis\",\"doi\":\"10.1155/ijcp/7466778\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><b>Objective:</b> Emergency physicians require exceptionally high perceptual and cognitive performance during their shifts. Visuomotor reaction time (VMRT) serves as a key indicator of this performance. In the study, we examined the relationship between shift duration and VMRT in physicians working in the emergency department.</p><p><b>Materials and Methods:</b> The cross-sectional study was conducted among emergency physicians working 24-h shifts. Their VMRTs were measured using the FitLight Trainer at 0, 8, 12, 16, and 24 h into the shift.</p><p><b>Results:</b> The study included 29 physicians. 11 (37.9%) of the physicians included in the study were female, and the median age was 28.00 (25.50–31.00). A significant difference was found when the VMRTs of the measurements made at the 0<sup>th</sup> hour, 8<sup>th</sup> hour, 12<sup>th</sup> hour, 16<sup>th</sup> hour, and 24<sup>th</sup> hour of the shift were compared (<i>p</i> = 0.035). When the post hoc analyses for the groups that created this difference were examined, the VMRT at 0 hour was 0.362 s [0.332–0.402], VMRT at 8 h was 0.358 s [0.328–382], VMRT at 12 hour was 0.353 s [0.319–0.391], VMRT at 16 hour was 0.349 s [0.319–0.383], and VMRT at 24 hour was 0.362 s [0.334–0.393]. While there was a significant difference between VMRT at 0, 8, 12, and 16 h (<i>p</i> = 0.005, <i>p</i> = 0.003, and <i>p</i> = 0.009, respectively), there was no significant difference between VMRT at 24 hour (<i>p</i> = 0.252, <i>p</i> = 0.776, and <i>p</i> = 0.764, respectively). There was no significant difference between shifts at 8, 12, and 16 h (<i>p</i> = 0.776 and <i>p</i> = 0.764, respectively).</p><p><b>Conclusion:</b> The VMRT decreased 16 h of physicians’ shift, after which physicians showed improved attention. Notably, there were no differences between the VMRT at 0 and 24 h.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13782,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Clinical Practice\",\"volume\":\"2025 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1155/ijcp/7466778\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Clinical Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1155/ijcp/7466778\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Clinical Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1155/ijcp/7466778","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:急诊医生在轮班期间需要异常高的感知和认知表现。视觉运动反应时间(VMRT)是这一性能的关键指标。在本研究中,我们研究了急诊科医生轮班时间与VMRT之间的关系。材料和方法:横断面研究在24小时轮班工作的急诊医生中进行。在轮班开始后的0,8,12,16和24小时,使用FitLight Trainer测量他们的视磁共振成像。结果:本研究纳入29名医生。纳入研究的医生中有11名(37.9%)为女性,年龄中位数为28.00(25.50-31.00)。比较换班第0小时、第8小时、第12小时、第16小时、第24小时的vmrt,差异有统计学意义(p = 0.035)。当对产生这种差异的组进行事后分析时,0小时的VMRT为0.362 s[0.332-0.402], 8小时的VMRT为0.358 s[0.328-382], 12小时的VMRT为0.353 s[0.319-0.391], 16小时的VMRT为0.349 s[0.319-0.383], 24小时的VMRT为0.362 s[0.334-0.393]。0、8、12、16 h的VMRT差异有统计学意义(p = 0.005、p = 0.003、p = 0.009), 24 h的VMRT差异无统计学意义(p = 0.252、p = 0.776、p = 0.764)。8小时、12小时和16小时班次之间无显著差异(p = 0.776和p = 0.764)。结论:VMRT减少了16 h的医生轮班,之后医生的注意力有所提高。值得注意的是,0和24 h的VMRT没有差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Assessment of Attention in Emergency Physicians; Visuomotor Reaction Time Relationship

Assessment of Attention in Emergency Physicians; Visuomotor Reaction Time Relationship

Objective: Emergency physicians require exceptionally high perceptual and cognitive performance during their shifts. Visuomotor reaction time (VMRT) serves as a key indicator of this performance. In the study, we examined the relationship between shift duration and VMRT in physicians working in the emergency department.

Materials and Methods: The cross-sectional study was conducted among emergency physicians working 24-h shifts. Their VMRTs were measured using the FitLight Trainer at 0, 8, 12, 16, and 24 h into the shift.

Results: The study included 29 physicians. 11 (37.9%) of the physicians included in the study were female, and the median age was 28.00 (25.50–31.00). A significant difference was found when the VMRTs of the measurements made at the 0th hour, 8th hour, 12th hour, 16th hour, and 24th hour of the shift were compared (p = 0.035). When the post hoc analyses for the groups that created this difference were examined, the VMRT at 0 hour was 0.362 s [0.332–0.402], VMRT at 8 h was 0.358 s [0.328–382], VMRT at 12 hour was 0.353 s [0.319–0.391], VMRT at 16 hour was 0.349 s [0.319–0.383], and VMRT at 24 hour was 0.362 s [0.334–0.393]. While there was a significant difference between VMRT at 0, 8, 12, and 16 h (p = 0.005, p = 0.003, and p = 0.009, respectively), there was no significant difference between VMRT at 24 hour (p = 0.252, p = 0.776, and p = 0.764, respectively). There was no significant difference between shifts at 8, 12, and 16 h (p = 0.776 and p = 0.764, respectively).

Conclusion: The VMRT decreased 16 h of physicians’ shift, after which physicians showed improved attention. Notably, there were no differences between the VMRT at 0 and 24 h.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
274
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: IJCP is a general medical journal. IJCP gives special priority to work that has international appeal. IJCP publishes: Editorials. IJCP Editorials are commissioned. [Peer reviewed at the editor''s discretion] Perspectives. Most IJCP Perspectives are commissioned. Example. [Peer reviewed at the editor''s discretion] Study design and interpretation. Example. [Always peer reviewed] Original data from clinical investigations. In particular: Primary research papers from RCTs, observational studies, epidemiological studies; pre-specified sub-analyses; pooled analyses. [Always peer reviewed] Meta-analyses. [Always peer reviewed] Systematic reviews. From October 2009, special priority will be given to systematic reviews. [Always peer reviewed] Non-systematic/narrative reviews. From October 2009, reviews that are not systematic will be considered only if they include a discrete Methods section that must explicitly describe the authors'' approach. Special priority will, however, be given to systematic reviews. [Always peer reviewed] ''How to…'' papers. Example. [Always peer reviewed] Consensus statements. [Always peer reviewed] Short reports. [Always peer reviewed] Letters. [Peer reviewed at the editor''s discretion] International scope IJCP publishes work from investigators globally. Around 30% of IJCP articles list an author from the UK. Around 30% of IJCP articles list an author from the USA or Canada. Around 45% of IJCP articles list an author from a European country that is not the UK. Around 15% of articles published in IJCP list an author from a country in the Asia-Pacific region.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信