Magda C. Teles, Gonçalo M. Melo, Suzana Herculano-Houzel, Rui F. Oliveira
{"title":"较大的鱼有较大的大脑,有更多的神经元,但在不同的生长条件下长大的群体中没有","authors":"Magda C. Teles, Gonçalo M. Melo, Suzana Herculano-Houzel, Rui F. Oliveira","doi":"10.1002/cne.70090","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Comparative work on brain size variation across vertebrates has shown that larger species have larger brains and that larger brains have more neurons across species in each clade. This trend supports the expectation that larger bodies require larger brains with more neurons but is at odds with the finding that within a species, larger animals do not necessarily have larger brains, and larger brains do not have more neurons. While the latter finding is inconsistent with the expectation that larger brained species evolve through selection of larger brained individuals, the lack of correlation between brain size and numbers of neurons across individuals of a same species might be due to the small range of variation that is typically found within a species. Here, we take advantage of ecologically regulated indeterminate growth exhibited by the cichlid fish tilapia (<i>Oreochromis mossambicus</i>) raised under different population densities to generate an over 30-fold variation in body mass across adult individuals of the same age. We find that across the cohorts of individuals raised with different growth opportunities provided by different population densities, larger animals have larger brains with more neurons that occur at similar neuronal densities, as applies to interspecific scaling in several vertebrate clades. Within each cohort raised at a given population density, however, those animals with more neurons have higher neuronal densities, but not larger brains or bodies, though the latter scale together—as applies to intraspecific scaling in mice and chickens. We conclude that brain size and number of neurons are determined independently across individuals in a population but scale together across cohorts, in step changes that accompany varying opportunities for growth, in the absence of any selection pressure. Based on these results, we propose a model of brain evolution through plastic changes in response to changing environmental opportunities that accounts for intra-, inter-, and clade-specific patterns of brain scaling and diversity.</p>","PeriodicalId":15552,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Comparative Neurology","volume":"533 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/cne.70090","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Larger Fish Have Larger Brains With More Neurons Across but Not Within Cohorts Raised in Different Growth Conditions\",\"authors\":\"Magda C. Teles, Gonçalo M. Melo, Suzana Herculano-Houzel, Rui F. Oliveira\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/cne.70090\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Comparative work on brain size variation across vertebrates has shown that larger species have larger brains and that larger brains have more neurons across species in each clade. This trend supports the expectation that larger bodies require larger brains with more neurons but is at odds with the finding that within a species, larger animals do not necessarily have larger brains, and larger brains do not have more neurons. While the latter finding is inconsistent with the expectation that larger brained species evolve through selection of larger brained individuals, the lack of correlation between brain size and numbers of neurons across individuals of a same species might be due to the small range of variation that is typically found within a species. Here, we take advantage of ecologically regulated indeterminate growth exhibited by the cichlid fish tilapia (<i>Oreochromis mossambicus</i>) raised under different population densities to generate an over 30-fold variation in body mass across adult individuals of the same age. We find that across the cohorts of individuals raised with different growth opportunities provided by different population densities, larger animals have larger brains with more neurons that occur at similar neuronal densities, as applies to interspecific scaling in several vertebrate clades. Within each cohort raised at a given population density, however, those animals with more neurons have higher neuronal densities, but not larger brains or bodies, though the latter scale together—as applies to intraspecific scaling in mice and chickens. We conclude that brain size and number of neurons are determined independently across individuals in a population but scale together across cohorts, in step changes that accompany varying opportunities for growth, in the absence of any selection pressure. Based on these results, we propose a model of brain evolution through plastic changes in response to changing environmental opportunities that accounts for intra-, inter-, and clade-specific patterns of brain scaling and diversity.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15552,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Comparative Neurology\",\"volume\":\"533 9\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/cne.70090\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Comparative Neurology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cne.70090\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"NEUROSCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Comparative Neurology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cne.70090","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Larger Fish Have Larger Brains With More Neurons Across but Not Within Cohorts Raised in Different Growth Conditions
Comparative work on brain size variation across vertebrates has shown that larger species have larger brains and that larger brains have more neurons across species in each clade. This trend supports the expectation that larger bodies require larger brains with more neurons but is at odds with the finding that within a species, larger animals do not necessarily have larger brains, and larger brains do not have more neurons. While the latter finding is inconsistent with the expectation that larger brained species evolve through selection of larger brained individuals, the lack of correlation between brain size and numbers of neurons across individuals of a same species might be due to the small range of variation that is typically found within a species. Here, we take advantage of ecologically regulated indeterminate growth exhibited by the cichlid fish tilapia (Oreochromis mossambicus) raised under different population densities to generate an over 30-fold variation in body mass across adult individuals of the same age. We find that across the cohorts of individuals raised with different growth opportunities provided by different population densities, larger animals have larger brains with more neurons that occur at similar neuronal densities, as applies to interspecific scaling in several vertebrate clades. Within each cohort raised at a given population density, however, those animals with more neurons have higher neuronal densities, but not larger brains or bodies, though the latter scale together—as applies to intraspecific scaling in mice and chickens. We conclude that brain size and number of neurons are determined independently across individuals in a population but scale together across cohorts, in step changes that accompany varying opportunities for growth, in the absence of any selection pressure. Based on these results, we propose a model of brain evolution through plastic changes in response to changing environmental opportunities that accounts for intra-, inter-, and clade-specific patterns of brain scaling and diversity.
期刊介绍:
Established in 1891, JCN is the oldest continually published basic neuroscience journal. Historically, as the name suggests, the journal focused on a comparison among species to uncover the intricacies of how the brain functions. In modern times, this research is called systems neuroscience where animal models are used to mimic core cognitive processes with the ultimate goal of understanding neural circuits and connections that give rise to behavioral patterns and different neural states.
Research published in JCN covers all species from invertebrates to humans, and the reports inform the readers about the function and organization of nervous systems in species with an emphasis on the way that species adaptations inform about the function or organization of the nervous systems, rather than on their evolution per se.
JCN publishes primary research articles and critical commentaries and review-type articles offering expert insight in to cutting edge research in the field of systems neuroscience; a complete list of contribution types is given in the Author Guidelines. For primary research contributions, only full-length investigative reports are desired; the journal does not accept short communications.