Asala Halaj, Jonathan D. Huppert, George Konstantakopoulos, Anthony S. David
{"title":"焦虑障碍洞察力评估量表(SAI-A)的制定与验证","authors":"Asala Halaj, Jonathan D. Huppert, George Konstantakopoulos, Anthony S. David","doi":"10.1155/da/8843975","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>There is a growing interest in understanding insight or illness awareness in anxiety; however, most assessment instruments were designed for psychosis. The unique features of anxiety highlight the need for tailored measures to accurately evaluate insight. The aim of this study was to develop and validate the Schedule for the Assessment of Insight in Anxiety (SAI-A), a clinician-rated scale for assessing insight in anxiety disorders. We interviewed 46 participants diagnosed with anxiety disorders, conducted SAI-A interviews, and administered self-report measures. Using correlation and principal component analysis (PCA), we identified and assessed scale components, ensuring their reliability and consistency. The SAI-A demonstrated acceptable psychometric properties, including convergent validity with an established self-report measure (<i>r</i> = −0.39, <i>p</i> = 0.008) and internal consistency (Cronbach’s α = 0.70). It showed moderate to strong agreement, interrater reliability (weighted kappa = 0.53, intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC] = 0.67), and test–retest reliability (ICC = 0.65). Two distinct insight components emerged: awareness of disorder and need for treatment. Higher overall SAI-A scores correlated with symptom severity and impairment (<i>r</i> = 0.56, <i>r</i> = 0.51, <i>p</i> < 0.001, respectively) and medication usage. The SAI-A is a valid and reliable assessment tool, providing a comprehensive framework for understanding and addressing insight in the context of anxiety disorders.</p>","PeriodicalId":55179,"journal":{"name":"Depression and Anxiety","volume":"2025 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1155/da/8843975","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Development and Validation of the Schedule for the Assessment of Insight in Anxiety Disorders (SAI-A)\",\"authors\":\"Asala Halaj, Jonathan D. Huppert, George Konstantakopoulos, Anthony S. David\",\"doi\":\"10.1155/da/8843975\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>There is a growing interest in understanding insight or illness awareness in anxiety; however, most assessment instruments were designed for psychosis. The unique features of anxiety highlight the need for tailored measures to accurately evaluate insight. The aim of this study was to develop and validate the Schedule for the Assessment of Insight in Anxiety (SAI-A), a clinician-rated scale for assessing insight in anxiety disorders. We interviewed 46 participants diagnosed with anxiety disorders, conducted SAI-A interviews, and administered self-report measures. Using correlation and principal component analysis (PCA), we identified and assessed scale components, ensuring their reliability and consistency. The SAI-A demonstrated acceptable psychometric properties, including convergent validity with an established self-report measure (<i>r</i> = −0.39, <i>p</i> = 0.008) and internal consistency (Cronbach’s α = 0.70). It showed moderate to strong agreement, interrater reliability (weighted kappa = 0.53, intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC] = 0.67), and test–retest reliability (ICC = 0.65). Two distinct insight components emerged: awareness of disorder and need for treatment. Higher overall SAI-A scores correlated with symptom severity and impairment (<i>r</i> = 0.56, <i>r</i> = 0.51, <i>p</i> < 0.001, respectively) and medication usage. The SAI-A is a valid and reliable assessment tool, providing a comprehensive framework for understanding and addressing insight in the context of anxiety disorders.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55179,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Depression and Anxiety\",\"volume\":\"2025 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1155/da/8843975\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Depression and Anxiety\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1155/da/8843975\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHIATRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Depression and Anxiety","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1155/da/8843975","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
人们对理解焦虑中的洞察力或疾病意识越来越感兴趣;然而,大多数评估工具是为精神病设计的。焦虑的独特特征凸显了需要量身定制的措施来准确评估洞察力。本研究的目的是开发和验证焦虑洞察力评估表(SAI-A),这是一种评估焦虑障碍洞察力的临床评定量表。我们采访了46名被诊断为焦虑症的参与者,进行了SAI-A访谈,并进行了自我报告测量。利用相关分析和主成分分析(PCA)对量表成分进行识别和评估,确保其可靠性和一致性。sa - a显示了可接受的心理测量特性,包括与既定自我报告测量的收敛效度(r = - 0.39, p = 0.008)和内部一致性(Cronbach 's α = 0.70)。结果显示出中等至高度的一致性、组间信度(加权kappa = 0.53,组内相关系数[ICC] = 0.67)和重测信度(ICC = 0.65)。出现了两个不同的洞察力组成部分:对障碍的认识和对治疗的需要。较高的sa - a总分与症状严重程度、功能障碍(r = 0.56, r = 0.51, p < 0.001)和药物使用相关。SAI-A是一种有效和可靠的评估工具,为理解和解决焦虑障碍背景下的见解提供了一个全面的框架。
Development and Validation of the Schedule for the Assessment of Insight in Anxiety Disorders (SAI-A)
There is a growing interest in understanding insight or illness awareness in anxiety; however, most assessment instruments were designed for psychosis. The unique features of anxiety highlight the need for tailored measures to accurately evaluate insight. The aim of this study was to develop and validate the Schedule for the Assessment of Insight in Anxiety (SAI-A), a clinician-rated scale for assessing insight in anxiety disorders. We interviewed 46 participants diagnosed with anxiety disorders, conducted SAI-A interviews, and administered self-report measures. Using correlation and principal component analysis (PCA), we identified and assessed scale components, ensuring their reliability and consistency. The SAI-A demonstrated acceptable psychometric properties, including convergent validity with an established self-report measure (r = −0.39, p = 0.008) and internal consistency (Cronbach’s α = 0.70). It showed moderate to strong agreement, interrater reliability (weighted kappa = 0.53, intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC] = 0.67), and test–retest reliability (ICC = 0.65). Two distinct insight components emerged: awareness of disorder and need for treatment. Higher overall SAI-A scores correlated with symptom severity and impairment (r = 0.56, r = 0.51, p < 0.001, respectively) and medication usage. The SAI-A is a valid and reliable assessment tool, providing a comprehensive framework for understanding and addressing insight in the context of anxiety disorders.
期刊介绍:
Depression and Anxiety is a scientific journal that focuses on the study of mood and anxiety disorders, as well as related phenomena in humans. The journal is dedicated to publishing high-quality research and review articles that contribute to the understanding and treatment of these conditions. The journal places a particular emphasis on articles that contribute to the clinical evaluation and care of individuals affected by mood and anxiety disorders. It prioritizes the publication of treatment-related research and review papers, as well as those that present novel findings that can directly impact clinical practice. The journal's goal is to advance the field by disseminating knowledge that can lead to better diagnosis, treatment, and management of these disorders, ultimately improving the quality of life for those who suffer from them.