辅助剂和成人手术患者周围神经阻滞后的反弹疼痛:随机对照试验的系统回顾和网络荟萃分析

Xiaodan Yang, Bin Su, Yupei Chen, Jianjun Yang, He Huang, Bing Chen, Pain Group of the Chinese Society of Anesthesiology
{"title":"辅助剂和成人手术患者周围神经阻滞后的反弹疼痛:随机对照试验的系统回顾和网络荟萃分析","authors":"Xiaodan Yang,&nbsp;Bin Su,&nbsp;Yupei Chen,&nbsp;Jianjun Yang,&nbsp;He Huang,&nbsp;Bing Chen,&nbsp;Pain Group of the Chinese Society of Anesthesiology","doi":"10.1007/s44254-025-00111-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>Rebound pain occurs when peripheral nerve blocks (PNBs) subside and this hampers patient recovery after surgery. This study aims to determine the most effective adjuvant to mitigate rebound pain in adult surgical patients.</p><h3>Methods</h3><p>A comprehensive search was conducted for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that reported rebound pain and utilized perineurally (PN) or intravenously (IV) administered adjuvants. We used multiple databases, including PubMed, Web of Science, the Cochrane Library, Embase, CNKI, Wanfang Data, SinoMed and Chinese medical journals from their inception until September 30, 2024. The primary outcome measured was the incidence of rebound pain. A network meta-analysis was performed using a frequentist approach.</p><h3>Results</h3><p>The meta-analysis included three RCTs examining ketamine/esketamine, eight evaluating dexamethasone and one assessing tropisetron. Compared to no adjuvant, IV dexamethasone was found to significantly reduce the incidence of rebound pain (odds ratio [OR] = 0.13, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.05, 0.35) and postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV; OR = 0.33, 95% CI: 0.12, 0.85), while also prolonging the time to onset of rebound pain (mean difference [MD] = 3.95 h, 95% CI: 1.36, 6.53). PN dexamethasone extended the time to onset of rebound pain (MD = 6.57 h, 95% CI: 3.20, 9.93) but did not significantly reduce the incidence of rebound pain or PONV. Ketamine/esketamine was associated with a reduction in the incidence of rebound pain (OR = 0.30, 95% CI: 0.10, 0.89) but did not affect PONV. According to the rank order of surface under the cumulative ranking curve analysis, IV dexamethasone exhibited the lowest incidence of rebound pain and PONV compared to PN dexamethasone, ketamine/esketamine, tropisetron and no adjuvant. PN dexamethasone was most effective in prolonging the onset of rebound pain compared to IV dexamethasone, tropisetron and no adjuvant. The overall quality of evidence was rated as low or very low.</p><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Current evidence, albeit of low quality, indicates that IV dexamethasone is the most effective adjuvant for the prevention of rebound pain, while PN dexamethasone is optimal for delaying its onset. Therefore, a combined approach utilizing both IV and PN dexamethasone following PNB may represent an effective strategy for managing rebound pain in adult surgical patients.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100082,"journal":{"name":"Anesthesiology and Perioperative Science","volume":"3 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s44254-025-00111-8.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Adjuvants and rebound pain following peripheral nerve block in adult surgical patients: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials\",\"authors\":\"Xiaodan Yang,&nbsp;Bin Su,&nbsp;Yupei Chen,&nbsp;Jianjun Yang,&nbsp;He Huang,&nbsp;Bing Chen,&nbsp;Pain Group of the Chinese Society of Anesthesiology\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s44254-025-00111-8\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>Rebound pain occurs when peripheral nerve blocks (PNBs) subside and this hampers patient recovery after surgery. This study aims to determine the most effective adjuvant to mitigate rebound pain in adult surgical patients.</p><h3>Methods</h3><p>A comprehensive search was conducted for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that reported rebound pain and utilized perineurally (PN) or intravenously (IV) administered adjuvants. We used multiple databases, including PubMed, Web of Science, the Cochrane Library, Embase, CNKI, Wanfang Data, SinoMed and Chinese medical journals from their inception until September 30, 2024. The primary outcome measured was the incidence of rebound pain. A network meta-analysis was performed using a frequentist approach.</p><h3>Results</h3><p>The meta-analysis included three RCTs examining ketamine/esketamine, eight evaluating dexamethasone and one assessing tropisetron. Compared to no adjuvant, IV dexamethasone was found to significantly reduce the incidence of rebound pain (odds ratio [OR] = 0.13, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.05, 0.35) and postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV; OR = 0.33, 95% CI: 0.12, 0.85), while also prolonging the time to onset of rebound pain (mean difference [MD] = 3.95 h, 95% CI: 1.36, 6.53). PN dexamethasone extended the time to onset of rebound pain (MD = 6.57 h, 95% CI: 3.20, 9.93) but did not significantly reduce the incidence of rebound pain or PONV. Ketamine/esketamine was associated with a reduction in the incidence of rebound pain (OR = 0.30, 95% CI: 0.10, 0.89) but did not affect PONV. According to the rank order of surface under the cumulative ranking curve analysis, IV dexamethasone exhibited the lowest incidence of rebound pain and PONV compared to PN dexamethasone, ketamine/esketamine, tropisetron and no adjuvant. PN dexamethasone was most effective in prolonging the onset of rebound pain compared to IV dexamethasone, tropisetron and no adjuvant. The overall quality of evidence was rated as low or very low.</p><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Current evidence, albeit of low quality, indicates that IV dexamethasone is the most effective adjuvant for the prevention of rebound pain, while PN dexamethasone is optimal for delaying its onset. Therefore, a combined approach utilizing both IV and PN dexamethasone following PNB may represent an effective strategy for managing rebound pain in adult surgical patients.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100082,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Anesthesiology and Perioperative Science\",\"volume\":\"3 3\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s44254-025-00111-8.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Anesthesiology and Perioperative Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s44254-025-00111-8\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anesthesiology and Perioperative Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s44254-025-00111-8","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:当周围神经阻滞(PNBs)消退时,会发生束缚性疼痛,这阻碍了患者术后的恢复。本研究旨在确定最有效的辅助治疗,以减轻成人手术患者的反跳疼痛。方法对报道反跳性疼痛并使用神经周(PN)或静脉注射(IV)佐剂的随机对照试验(rct)进行全面检索。我们使用了多个数据库,包括PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, Embase, CNKI,万方数据,中国医学信息数据库和中国医学期刊从创刊到2024年9月30日。测量的主要结局是反跳疼痛的发生率。使用频率分析方法进行网络元分析。结果meta分析包括3项氯胺酮/艾氯胺酮的随机对照试验,8项地塞米松的随机对照试验和1项托哌司琼的随机对照试验。与无辅助治疗相比,静脉注射地塞米松显著降低了反跳性疼痛(优势比[OR] = 0.13, 95%可信区间[CI]: 0.05, 0.35)和术后恶心呕吐(PONV; OR = 0.33, 95% CI: 0.12, 0.85)的发生率,同时延长了反跳性疼痛发生的时间(平均差异[MD] = 3.95 h, 95% CI: 1.36, 6.53)。PN地塞米松延长了反跳痛的发生时间(MD = 6.57 h, 95% CI: 3.20, 9.93),但没有显著降低反跳痛或PONV的发生率。氯胺酮/艾氯胺酮与反跳性疼痛发生率降低相关(OR = 0.30, 95% CI: 0.10, 0.89),但不影响PONV。根据累积排序曲线下表面的排列顺序分析,静脉注射地塞米松与静脉注射地塞米松、氯胺酮/艾氯胺酮、托司司琼和无辅助相比,反跳痛和PONV的发生率最低。与静脉注射地塞米松、托司司琼和无辅助治疗相比,PN地塞米松在延长反跳性疼痛发作方面最有效。证据的整体质量被评为低或非常低。结论静脉注射地塞米松是预防反跳性疼痛最有效的佐剂,而静脉注射地塞米松是延缓反跳性疼痛发作的最佳佐剂,尽管证据质量不高。因此,在PNB后使用静脉注射和PN地塞米松的联合方法可能是治疗成人手术患者反跳疼痛的有效策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Adjuvants and rebound pain following peripheral nerve block in adult surgical patients: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Purpose

Rebound pain occurs when peripheral nerve blocks (PNBs) subside and this hampers patient recovery after surgery. This study aims to determine the most effective adjuvant to mitigate rebound pain in adult surgical patients.

Methods

A comprehensive search was conducted for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that reported rebound pain and utilized perineurally (PN) or intravenously (IV) administered adjuvants. We used multiple databases, including PubMed, Web of Science, the Cochrane Library, Embase, CNKI, Wanfang Data, SinoMed and Chinese medical journals from their inception until September 30, 2024. The primary outcome measured was the incidence of rebound pain. A network meta-analysis was performed using a frequentist approach.

Results

The meta-analysis included three RCTs examining ketamine/esketamine, eight evaluating dexamethasone and one assessing tropisetron. Compared to no adjuvant, IV dexamethasone was found to significantly reduce the incidence of rebound pain (odds ratio [OR] = 0.13, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.05, 0.35) and postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV; OR = 0.33, 95% CI: 0.12, 0.85), while also prolonging the time to onset of rebound pain (mean difference [MD] = 3.95 h, 95% CI: 1.36, 6.53). PN dexamethasone extended the time to onset of rebound pain (MD = 6.57 h, 95% CI: 3.20, 9.93) but did not significantly reduce the incidence of rebound pain or PONV. Ketamine/esketamine was associated with a reduction in the incidence of rebound pain (OR = 0.30, 95% CI: 0.10, 0.89) but did not affect PONV. According to the rank order of surface under the cumulative ranking curve analysis, IV dexamethasone exhibited the lowest incidence of rebound pain and PONV compared to PN dexamethasone, ketamine/esketamine, tropisetron and no adjuvant. PN dexamethasone was most effective in prolonging the onset of rebound pain compared to IV dexamethasone, tropisetron and no adjuvant. The overall quality of evidence was rated as low or very low.

Conclusion

Current evidence, albeit of low quality, indicates that IV dexamethasone is the most effective adjuvant for the prevention of rebound pain, while PN dexamethasone is optimal for delaying its onset. Therefore, a combined approach utilizing both IV and PN dexamethasone following PNB may represent an effective strategy for managing rebound pain in adult surgical patients.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信