亚美尼亚种族灭绝幸存者口述历史作为档案资源

IF 2.1 Q2 INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE
Manuk Avedikyan, Arman Khachatryan
{"title":"亚美尼亚种族灭绝幸存者口述历史作为档案资源","authors":"Manuk Avedikyan,&nbsp;Arman Khachatryan","doi":"10.1007/s10502-025-09516-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This article explores the earliest efforts to collect oral histories from Armenian Genocide survivors and examines their status as archival collections. The most significant collections were initiated by Armenian-Americans, comprising approximately over half of all recorded testimonies. A general timeline and overview of the development of these collections is provided and scrutinized to understand the breadth of the collection’s holdings and accessibility for scholarship, and the social contexts behind their creation. The article also examines the background and trajectory of oral history use in Genocide Studies, particularly within Armenian Genocide Studies, and the value it offers to the field as preservation, digitization, and accessibility become increasingly central to contemporary research. For decades, efforts to “prove” the genocide in response to Turkish denial discouraged many scholars from using Armenian sources in order to maintain a non-biased perspective. In recent years, however, genocide denial in academia and debates around the use of oral history have diminished within academia, and a growing number of scholars have begun incorporating these sources into research topics that arguably require a protagonist’s personal experience enriching and filling in gaps that traditional sources are not able to fill. The scattered nature, recent institutionalization, limited digitization, and access policies of certain oral history collections remain both a reason for their growing use and a barrier to wider accessibility.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":46131,"journal":{"name":"ARCHIVAL SCIENCE","volume":"25 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10502-025-09516-7.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Armenian Genocide survivor oral history as an archival resource\",\"authors\":\"Manuk Avedikyan,&nbsp;Arman Khachatryan\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10502-025-09516-7\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>This article explores the earliest efforts to collect oral histories from Armenian Genocide survivors and examines their status as archival collections. The most significant collections were initiated by Armenian-Americans, comprising approximately over half of all recorded testimonies. A general timeline and overview of the development of these collections is provided and scrutinized to understand the breadth of the collection’s holdings and accessibility for scholarship, and the social contexts behind their creation. The article also examines the background and trajectory of oral history use in Genocide Studies, particularly within Armenian Genocide Studies, and the value it offers to the field as preservation, digitization, and accessibility become increasingly central to contemporary research. For decades, efforts to “prove” the genocide in response to Turkish denial discouraged many scholars from using Armenian sources in order to maintain a non-biased perspective. In recent years, however, genocide denial in academia and debates around the use of oral history have diminished within academia, and a growing number of scholars have begun incorporating these sources into research topics that arguably require a protagonist’s personal experience enriching and filling in gaps that traditional sources are not able to fill. The scattered nature, recent institutionalization, limited digitization, and access policies of certain oral history collections remain both a reason for their growing use and a barrier to wider accessibility.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46131,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ARCHIVAL SCIENCE\",\"volume\":\"25 4\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10502-025-09516-7.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ARCHIVAL SCIENCE\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10502-025-09516-7\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ARCHIVAL SCIENCE","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10502-025-09516-7","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文探讨了最早收集亚美尼亚种族灭绝幸存者口述历史的努力,并考察了他们作为档案收藏的地位。最重要的收集是由亚美尼亚裔美国人发起的,约占所有记录证词的一半以上。这些收藏的发展的一般时间表和概述被提供和仔细审查,以了解收藏的广度和学术的可及性,以及他们的创作背后的社会背景。​几十年来,为了“证明”种族灭绝是对土耳其否认的回应,许多学者为了保持公正的观点而不愿使用亚美尼亚的资料。然而,近年来,学术界对种族灭绝的否认和围绕口述历史使用的辩论在学术界已经减少,越来越多的学者开始将这些资料纳入研究主题,这些研究主题可以说需要主人公的个人经历来丰富和填补传统资料无法填补的空白。某些口述历史收藏品的分散性质、最近的制度化、有限的数字化和访问政策仍然是它们越来越多地被使用的原因,也是更广泛访问的障碍。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Armenian Genocide survivor oral history as an archival resource

This article explores the earliest efforts to collect oral histories from Armenian Genocide survivors and examines their status as archival collections. The most significant collections were initiated by Armenian-Americans, comprising approximately over half of all recorded testimonies. A general timeline and overview of the development of these collections is provided and scrutinized to understand the breadth of the collection’s holdings and accessibility for scholarship, and the social contexts behind their creation. The article also examines the background and trajectory of oral history use in Genocide Studies, particularly within Armenian Genocide Studies, and the value it offers to the field as preservation, digitization, and accessibility become increasingly central to contemporary research. For decades, efforts to “prove” the genocide in response to Turkish denial discouraged many scholars from using Armenian sources in order to maintain a non-biased perspective. In recent years, however, genocide denial in academia and debates around the use of oral history have diminished within academia, and a growing number of scholars have begun incorporating these sources into research topics that arguably require a protagonist’s personal experience enriching and filling in gaps that traditional sources are not able to fill. The scattered nature, recent institutionalization, limited digitization, and access policies of certain oral history collections remain both a reason for their growing use and a barrier to wider accessibility.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
ARCHIVAL SCIENCE
ARCHIVAL SCIENCE INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE-
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
18.20%
发文量
26
期刊介绍: Archival Science promotes the development of archival science as an autonomous scientific discipline. The journal covers all aspects of archival science theory, methodology, and practice. Moreover, it investigates different cultural approaches to creation, management and provision of access to archives, records, and data. It also seeks to promote the exchange and comparison of concepts, views and attitudes related to recordkeeping issues around the world.Archival Science''s approach is integrated, interdisciplinary, and intercultural. Its scope encompasses the entire field of recorded process-related information, analyzed in terms of form, structure, and context. To meet its objectives, the journal draws from scientific disciplines that deal with the function of records and the way they are created, preserved, and retrieved; the context in which information is generated, managed, and used; and the social and cultural environment of records creation at different times and places.Covers all aspects of archival science theory, methodology, and practiceInvestigates different cultural approaches to creation, management and provision of access to archives, records, and dataPromotes the exchange and comparison of concepts, views, and attitudes related to recordkeeping issues around the worldAddresses the entire field of recorded process-related information, analyzed in terms of form, structure, and context
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信