滞留时间(体积)测定方法综述

IF 1.1 4区 化学 Q4 CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL
V. I. Deineka
{"title":"滞留时间(体积)测定方法综述","authors":"V. I. Deineka","doi":"10.1134/S1061934825700212","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Known methods for determining hold-up time, essential for calculating retention factors and related chromatographic patterns, are reviewed. The retention factor, initially defined in the theoretical plate model for chromatography on non-porous sorbents, can be adapted to porous sorbents containing mobile phase components in stagnant zones within the sorbent pores. However, in this case, the zone of an unretained solute moves slower than the actual velocity of the mobile phase. The most commonly used approaches from previously proposed methods are considered, taking into account new experimental data. The possible presence of gallery pores in sorbents raises concerns about the gravimetric method. Furthermore, this method, like many others, does not take into account differences in retention mechanisms between adsorption and absorption. The use of solvents wetting the stationary phase likely leads to the penetration of solvent molecule into the attached phase and should yield a hold-up volume applicable to the absorption mechanism. If the solvent poorly wets the stationary phase, the obtained hold-up volume loses clear physical meaning. Calculations of hold-up time based on the retention of deuterated water are more appropriate to the determination of hold-up time in adsorption-based retention but may result in overestimated values due to water adsorption on residual silanol groups. The use of deuterated organic solvents for the same purpose raises additional concerns. Using inorganic salts as hold-up volume markers may lead to inaccuracies due to exclusion effects, which should also be considered in other methods. The homologous series method is not entirely reliable for several reasons discussed in the text. Similarly, the system peak method cannot provide unambiguous confirmation, as it may correspond to retention with an uncertain degree of exclusion effects. Consequently, the problem remains unresolved, and the development of new specialized approaches is required.</p>","PeriodicalId":606,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Analytical Chemistry","volume":"80 5","pages":"794 - 800"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Critical Review of Methods for Hold-Up Time (Volume) Determination\",\"authors\":\"V. I. Deineka\",\"doi\":\"10.1134/S1061934825700212\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Known methods for determining hold-up time, essential for calculating retention factors and related chromatographic patterns, are reviewed. The retention factor, initially defined in the theoretical plate model for chromatography on non-porous sorbents, can be adapted to porous sorbents containing mobile phase components in stagnant zones within the sorbent pores. However, in this case, the zone of an unretained solute moves slower than the actual velocity of the mobile phase. The most commonly used approaches from previously proposed methods are considered, taking into account new experimental data. The possible presence of gallery pores in sorbents raises concerns about the gravimetric method. Furthermore, this method, like many others, does not take into account differences in retention mechanisms between adsorption and absorption. The use of solvents wetting the stationary phase likely leads to the penetration of solvent molecule into the attached phase and should yield a hold-up volume applicable to the absorption mechanism. If the solvent poorly wets the stationary phase, the obtained hold-up volume loses clear physical meaning. Calculations of hold-up time based on the retention of deuterated water are more appropriate to the determination of hold-up time in adsorption-based retention but may result in overestimated values due to water adsorption on residual silanol groups. The use of deuterated organic solvents for the same purpose raises additional concerns. Using inorganic salts as hold-up volume markers may lead to inaccuracies due to exclusion effects, which should also be considered in other methods. The homologous series method is not entirely reliable for several reasons discussed in the text. Similarly, the system peak method cannot provide unambiguous confirmation, as it may correspond to retention with an uncertain degree of exclusion effects. Consequently, the problem remains unresolved, and the development of new specialized approaches is required.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":606,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Analytical Chemistry\",\"volume\":\"80 5\",\"pages\":\"794 - 800\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Analytical Chemistry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"92\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1134/S1061934825700212\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"化学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Analytical Chemistry","FirstCategoryId":"92","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1134/S1061934825700212","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

已知的测定保持时间的方法,对于计算保留因子和相关的色谱模式至关重要。保留系数最初是在非多孔吸附剂色谱的理论板模型中定义的,可以适用于在吸附剂孔内停滞区含有流动相组分的多孔吸附剂。然而,在这种情况下,未保留溶质区域的移动速度比流动相的实际速度慢。考虑到新的实验数据,考虑了以前提出的方法中最常用的方法。吸附剂中可能存在的廊孔引起了对重量法的关注。此外,与许多其他方法一样,这种方法没有考虑到吸附和吸收之间保留机制的差异。使用溶剂润湿固定相可能导致溶剂分子渗透到附着相中,并应产生适用于吸收机制的保持体积。如果溶剂不能很好地润湿固定相,得到的保持体积就失去了明确的物理意义。基于氘水的保留计算保持时间更适合于基于吸附的保留中保持时间的确定,但由于水在剩余硅醇基团上的吸附,可能会导致高估的值。为同一目的使用氘化有机溶剂引起了更多的关注。使用无机盐作为截留体积标记物可能由于排斥效应而导致不准确,在其他方法中也应考虑到这一点。由于文中讨论的几个原因,同源级数法并不完全可靠。同样,系统峰法也不能提供明确的确认,因为它可能对应的保留具有不确定程度的排除效应。因此,这个问题仍然没有解决,需要发展新的专门办法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A Critical Review of Methods for Hold-Up Time (Volume) Determination

Known methods for determining hold-up time, essential for calculating retention factors and related chromatographic patterns, are reviewed. The retention factor, initially defined in the theoretical plate model for chromatography on non-porous sorbents, can be adapted to porous sorbents containing mobile phase components in stagnant zones within the sorbent pores. However, in this case, the zone of an unretained solute moves slower than the actual velocity of the mobile phase. The most commonly used approaches from previously proposed methods are considered, taking into account new experimental data. The possible presence of gallery pores in sorbents raises concerns about the gravimetric method. Furthermore, this method, like many others, does not take into account differences in retention mechanisms between adsorption and absorption. The use of solvents wetting the stationary phase likely leads to the penetration of solvent molecule into the attached phase and should yield a hold-up volume applicable to the absorption mechanism. If the solvent poorly wets the stationary phase, the obtained hold-up volume loses clear physical meaning. Calculations of hold-up time based on the retention of deuterated water are more appropriate to the determination of hold-up time in adsorption-based retention but may result in overestimated values due to water adsorption on residual silanol groups. The use of deuterated organic solvents for the same purpose raises additional concerns. Using inorganic salts as hold-up volume markers may lead to inaccuracies due to exclusion effects, which should also be considered in other methods. The homologous series method is not entirely reliable for several reasons discussed in the text. Similarly, the system peak method cannot provide unambiguous confirmation, as it may correspond to retention with an uncertain degree of exclusion effects. Consequently, the problem remains unresolved, and the development of new specialized approaches is required.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Analytical Chemistry
Journal of Analytical Chemistry 化学-分析化学
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
9.10%
发文量
146
审稿时长
13 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Analytical Chemistry is an international peer reviewed journal that covers theoretical and applied aspects of analytical chemistry; it informs the reader about new achievements in analytical methods, instruments and reagents. Ample space is devoted to problems arising in the analysis of vital media such as water and air. Consideration is given to the detection and determination of metal ions, anions, and various organic substances. The journal welcomes manuscripts from all countries in the English or Russian language.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信