化学物质输运和电子筛选对太阳模式中日震和中微子观测的影响

IF 2.4 3区 物理与天体物理 Q2 ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS
Morgan Deal, Gaël Buldgen, Louis Manchon, Yveline Lebreton, Arlette Noels, Richard Scuflaire
{"title":"化学物质输运和电子筛选对太阳模式中日震和中微子观测的影响","authors":"Morgan Deal,&nbsp;Gaël Buldgen,&nbsp;Louis Manchon,&nbsp;Yveline Lebreton,&nbsp;Arlette Noels,&nbsp;Richard Scuflaire","doi":"10.1007/s11207-025-02512-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The transport of chemical elements in stellar interiors is one of the greatest sources of uncertainties of solar and stellar modelling. The Sun, with its exquisite spectroscopic, helioseismic and neutrino observations, offers a prime environment to test the prescriptions used for both microscopic and macroscopic transport processes. We study in detail the impact of various formalisms for atomic diffusion on helioseismic constraints in both CLES (Scuflaire et al. 2008a) and Cesam2k20 (Morel and Lebreton 2008; Marques et al. 2013; Deal et al. 2018) models and compare both codes in detail. Moreover, due to the inability of standard models using microscopic diffusion to reproduce light element depletion in the Sun (Li, Be), another efficient process must be included to reproduce these constraints (rotation-induced: Eggenberger et al. 2022, overshooting -or penetrative convection- below the convective envelope: Thévenin et al. 2017, or ad hoc turbulence: Lebreton and Maeder 1987; Richer, Michaud, and Turcotte 2000). However, introducing such an extra mixing leads to issues with the CNO neutrino fluxes (see Buldgen et al. 2023), which seem to be systematically lower than the Borexino observations (Appel et al. 2022). Another key aspect to consider when reconciling models with neutrino fluxes is the impact of electronic screening (Mussack and Däppen 2011).</p></div>","PeriodicalId":777,"journal":{"name":"Solar Physics","volume":"300 7","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Impact of the Transport of Chemicals and Electronic Screening on Helioseismic and Neutrino Observations in Solar Models\",\"authors\":\"Morgan Deal,&nbsp;Gaël Buldgen,&nbsp;Louis Manchon,&nbsp;Yveline Lebreton,&nbsp;Arlette Noels,&nbsp;Richard Scuflaire\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11207-025-02512-1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>The transport of chemical elements in stellar interiors is one of the greatest sources of uncertainties of solar and stellar modelling. The Sun, with its exquisite spectroscopic, helioseismic and neutrino observations, offers a prime environment to test the prescriptions used for both microscopic and macroscopic transport processes. We study in detail the impact of various formalisms for atomic diffusion on helioseismic constraints in both CLES (Scuflaire et al. 2008a) and Cesam2k20 (Morel and Lebreton 2008; Marques et al. 2013; Deal et al. 2018) models and compare both codes in detail. Moreover, due to the inability of standard models using microscopic diffusion to reproduce light element depletion in the Sun (Li, Be), another efficient process must be included to reproduce these constraints (rotation-induced: Eggenberger et al. 2022, overshooting -or penetrative convection- below the convective envelope: Thévenin et al. 2017, or ad hoc turbulence: Lebreton and Maeder 1987; Richer, Michaud, and Turcotte 2000). However, introducing such an extra mixing leads to issues with the CNO neutrino fluxes (see Buldgen et al. 2023), which seem to be systematically lower than the Borexino observations (Appel et al. 2022). Another key aspect to consider when reconciling models with neutrino fluxes is the impact of electronic screening (Mussack and Däppen 2011).</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":777,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Solar Physics\",\"volume\":\"300 7\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Solar Physics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"101\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11207-025-02512-1\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"物理与天体物理\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Solar Physics","FirstCategoryId":"101","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11207-025-02512-1","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"物理与天体物理","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

恒星内部化学元素的传输是太阳和恒星模型不确定性的最大来源之一。太阳拥有精细的光谱学、日震和中微子观测,为测试微观和宏观传输过程的处方提供了一个绝佳的环境。我们详细研究了CLES (Scuflaire et al. 2008a)和Cesam2k20 (Morel and Lebreton 2008; Marques et al. 2013; Deal et al. 2018)模型中原子扩散的各种形式对日震约束的影响,并详细比较了两种代码。此外,由于使用微观扩散的标准模型无法重现太阳中的轻元素损耗(Li, Be),必须包括另一个有效的过程来重现这些约束(旋转诱导:Eggenberger等人,2022;对流包膜下的超冲或穿透对流:th venin等人,2017;或临时湍流:Lebreton和Maeder 1987; Richer, Michaud, and Turcotte 2000)。然而,引入这种额外的混合会导致CNO中微子通量的问题(见Buldgen et al. 2023),它似乎比Borexino观测值要低(Appel et al. 2022)。在调和模型与中微子通量时要考虑的另一个关键方面是电子筛选的影响(Mussack and Däppen 2011)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Impact of the Transport of Chemicals and Electronic Screening on Helioseismic and Neutrino Observations in Solar Models

The transport of chemical elements in stellar interiors is one of the greatest sources of uncertainties of solar and stellar modelling. The Sun, with its exquisite spectroscopic, helioseismic and neutrino observations, offers a prime environment to test the prescriptions used for both microscopic and macroscopic transport processes. We study in detail the impact of various formalisms for atomic diffusion on helioseismic constraints in both CLES (Scuflaire et al. 2008a) and Cesam2k20 (Morel and Lebreton 2008; Marques et al. 2013; Deal et al. 2018) models and compare both codes in detail. Moreover, due to the inability of standard models using microscopic diffusion to reproduce light element depletion in the Sun (Li, Be), another efficient process must be included to reproduce these constraints (rotation-induced: Eggenberger et al. 2022, overshooting -or penetrative convection- below the convective envelope: Thévenin et al. 2017, or ad hoc turbulence: Lebreton and Maeder 1987; Richer, Michaud, and Turcotte 2000). However, introducing such an extra mixing leads to issues with the CNO neutrino fluxes (see Buldgen et al. 2023), which seem to be systematically lower than the Borexino observations (Appel et al. 2022). Another key aspect to consider when reconciling models with neutrino fluxes is the impact of electronic screening (Mussack and Däppen 2011).

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Solar Physics
Solar Physics 地学天文-天文与天体物理
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
17.90%
发文量
146
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Solar Physics was founded in 1967 and is the principal journal for the publication of the results of fundamental research on the Sun. The journal treats all aspects of solar physics, ranging from the internal structure of the Sun and its evolution to the outer corona and solar wind in interplanetary space. Papers on solar-terrestrial physics and on stellar research are also published when their results have a direct bearing on our understanding of the Sun.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信