{"title":"纳米材料的职业暴露:范围综述","authors":"Soqrat Omari Shekaftik, Neda Mehrparvar, Zahra Peivandi, Sadaf Tasbiti Banasaz, Athena Rafieepour, Narges Moghadasi, Azadeh Ashtarinezhad","doi":"10.1007/s10876-025-02864-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>The production and utilization of nanomaterials has been steadily expanding. This leads to significant exposure of the workforce to these materials during their work activities.</p><h3>Methods</h3><p>A comprehensive search across PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science databases using keywords related to “occupational exposure” and “nanomaterials” was conducted. Initially, duplicates were eliminated, followed by a review based on title and abstract to exclude irrelevant items. the remaining documents underwent full-text examination for adherence to inclusion criteria. Out of 3,314 initial documents, 303 articles met the study’s criteria.</p><h3>Findings</h3><p>More than 30 countries had investigated the occupational exposure to nanomaterials, with the United States, Korea, and China at the top. Totally, nearly 30,000 employees were exposed to nanomaterials and more than 13,000 non-exposed employees were investigated. More than 70% of the studies were cross-sectional and the least attention was paid to long-term and cohort studies. Most of the studies were carried out, in environments producing engineered nanomaterials, environments with incidental nanomaterials, laboratory environments, and environments consuming nanomaterials, respectively. Metal-oxide, carbon-based, and metal nanomaterials were investigated more than other nanomaterials, respectively.</p><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>One crucial aspect of nanotechnology should be the evaluation of occupational exposure to nanomaterials. The majority of the research should focus on more hazardous nanomaterials that are produced and consumed in greater quantities. It is preferable for research to shift toward long terms and cohorts. It is advised that the safety, health, and environmental concerns of nanotechnology be given careful consideration and growth alongside other related areas.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":618,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cluster Science","volume":"36 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Occupational Exposure to Nanomaterials: A Scoping Review\",\"authors\":\"Soqrat Omari Shekaftik, Neda Mehrparvar, Zahra Peivandi, Sadaf Tasbiti Banasaz, Athena Rafieepour, Narges Moghadasi, Azadeh Ashtarinezhad\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10876-025-02864-5\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>The production and utilization of nanomaterials has been steadily expanding. This leads to significant exposure of the workforce to these materials during their work activities.</p><h3>Methods</h3><p>A comprehensive search across PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science databases using keywords related to “occupational exposure” and “nanomaterials” was conducted. Initially, duplicates were eliminated, followed by a review based on title and abstract to exclude irrelevant items. the remaining documents underwent full-text examination for adherence to inclusion criteria. Out of 3,314 initial documents, 303 articles met the study’s criteria.</p><h3>Findings</h3><p>More than 30 countries had investigated the occupational exposure to nanomaterials, with the United States, Korea, and China at the top. Totally, nearly 30,000 employees were exposed to nanomaterials and more than 13,000 non-exposed employees were investigated. More than 70% of the studies were cross-sectional and the least attention was paid to long-term and cohort studies. Most of the studies were carried out, in environments producing engineered nanomaterials, environments with incidental nanomaterials, laboratory environments, and environments consuming nanomaterials, respectively. Metal-oxide, carbon-based, and metal nanomaterials were investigated more than other nanomaterials, respectively.</p><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>One crucial aspect of nanotechnology should be the evaluation of occupational exposure to nanomaterials. The majority of the research should focus on more hazardous nanomaterials that are produced and consumed in greater quantities. It is preferable for research to shift toward long terms and cohorts. It is advised that the safety, health, and environmental concerns of nanotechnology be given careful consideration and growth alongside other related areas.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":618,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Cluster Science\",\"volume\":\"36 4\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Cluster Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"92\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10876-025-02864-5\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"化学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CHEMISTRY, INORGANIC & NUCLEAR\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cluster Science","FirstCategoryId":"92","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10876-025-02864-5","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, INORGANIC & NUCLEAR","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
纳米材料的生产和利用正在稳步扩大。这导致劳动力在工作活动中大量接触这些材料。方法采用“职业暴露”和“纳米材料”相关关键词对PubMed、Scopus和Web of Science数据库进行综合检索。首先,删除重复,然后根据标题和摘要进行审查,以排除不相关的项目。对其余文件进行全文审查,以确定是否符合纳入标准。在3314份初始文件中,有303篇文章符合研究标准。研究结果30多个国家调查了纳米材料的职业暴露情况,其中美国、韩国和中国名列前茅。总共有近3万名员工接触到纳米材料,超过1.3万名未接触到纳米材料的员工接受了调查。超过70%的研究是横断面研究,对长期和队列研究的关注最少。大多数研究分别在产生工程纳米材料的环境、附带纳米材料的环境、实验室环境和消耗纳米材料的环境中进行。金属氧化物纳米材料、碳基纳米材料和金属纳米材料的研究分别多于其他纳米材料。结论纳米技术的一个重要方面是纳米材料职业暴露评价。大多数研究应该集中在生产和大量消耗的更危险的纳米材料上。更可取的是研究转向长期和群体。建议仔细考虑纳米技术的安全、健康和环境问题,并与其他相关领域一起发展。
Occupational Exposure to Nanomaterials: A Scoping Review
Background
The production and utilization of nanomaterials has been steadily expanding. This leads to significant exposure of the workforce to these materials during their work activities.
Methods
A comprehensive search across PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science databases using keywords related to “occupational exposure” and “nanomaterials” was conducted. Initially, duplicates were eliminated, followed by a review based on title and abstract to exclude irrelevant items. the remaining documents underwent full-text examination for adherence to inclusion criteria. Out of 3,314 initial documents, 303 articles met the study’s criteria.
Findings
More than 30 countries had investigated the occupational exposure to nanomaterials, with the United States, Korea, and China at the top. Totally, nearly 30,000 employees were exposed to nanomaterials and more than 13,000 non-exposed employees were investigated. More than 70% of the studies were cross-sectional and the least attention was paid to long-term and cohort studies. Most of the studies were carried out, in environments producing engineered nanomaterials, environments with incidental nanomaterials, laboratory environments, and environments consuming nanomaterials, respectively. Metal-oxide, carbon-based, and metal nanomaterials were investigated more than other nanomaterials, respectively.
Conclusion
One crucial aspect of nanotechnology should be the evaluation of occupational exposure to nanomaterials. The majority of the research should focus on more hazardous nanomaterials that are produced and consumed in greater quantities. It is preferable for research to shift toward long terms and cohorts. It is advised that the safety, health, and environmental concerns of nanotechnology be given careful consideration and growth alongside other related areas.
期刊介绍:
The journal publishes the following types of papers: (a) original and important research;
(b) authoritative comprehensive reviews or short overviews of topics of current
interest; (c) brief but urgent communications on new significant research; and (d)
commentaries intended to foster the exchange of innovative or provocative ideas, and
to encourage dialogue, amongst researchers working in different cluster
disciplines.