剪力墙开口及开口周围配筋对结构加固的影响

IF 4.1 2区 工程技术 Q2 ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL
Taha Yasin Altiok, Kabil Cetin, Ali Demir
{"title":"剪力墙开口及开口周围配筋对结构加固的影响","authors":"Taha Yasin Altiok,&nbsp;Kabil Cetin,&nbsp;Ali Demir","doi":"10.1007/s10518-025-02180-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>A common method for strengthening structures with low lateral stiffness is to add cast-in-place shear walls within a reinforced concrete (RC) frame. However, shear wall openings may be unavoidable in strengthening works due to architectural and installation requirements. In this study, the effect of the shear wall on structural strengthening was investigated by considering the cases with and without openings. A total of four inadequate RC frames (1/3 scale, single-story, single-span), reflecting common deficiencies observed in earthquake-damaged structures, were produced as part of the study. One of these frames was selected as a reference specimen and was not strengthened, while the others were strengthened with RC shear walls with and without openings. In one of the shear walls with an opening, special reinforcement details around the opening specified in the Turkish Building Earthquake Code (TBEC-2018) were applied and the effects of these reinforcements on the structural behavior were investigated. All specimens were tested under repeated and reversible loads simulating an earthquake. The experimental results were evaluated in terms of structural behavior parameters. The shear wall without opening increased the lateral load capacity by approximately 40% compared to the unstrengthened specimen. The application of TBEC-2018-compliant reinforcement around the opening improved the capacity by 16% relative to the unreinforced opening case. Initial stiffness increased by 35.3% with the use of opening reinforcement. Specimens without openings dissipated more energy in the plastic region, while opening reinforcement contributed positively up to peak load. Ductility decreased with the presence of openings, but improved with reinforcement.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":9364,"journal":{"name":"Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering","volume":"23 8","pages":"3421 - 3449"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10518-025-02180-3.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effect of shear wall opening and reinforcement around opening on the structural strengthening\",\"authors\":\"Taha Yasin Altiok,&nbsp;Kabil Cetin,&nbsp;Ali Demir\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10518-025-02180-3\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>A common method for strengthening structures with low lateral stiffness is to add cast-in-place shear walls within a reinforced concrete (RC) frame. However, shear wall openings may be unavoidable in strengthening works due to architectural and installation requirements. In this study, the effect of the shear wall on structural strengthening was investigated by considering the cases with and without openings. A total of four inadequate RC frames (1/3 scale, single-story, single-span), reflecting common deficiencies observed in earthquake-damaged structures, were produced as part of the study. One of these frames was selected as a reference specimen and was not strengthened, while the others were strengthened with RC shear walls with and without openings. In one of the shear walls with an opening, special reinforcement details around the opening specified in the Turkish Building Earthquake Code (TBEC-2018) were applied and the effects of these reinforcements on the structural behavior were investigated. All specimens were tested under repeated and reversible loads simulating an earthquake. The experimental results were evaluated in terms of structural behavior parameters. The shear wall without opening increased the lateral load capacity by approximately 40% compared to the unstrengthened specimen. The application of TBEC-2018-compliant reinforcement around the opening improved the capacity by 16% relative to the unreinforced opening case. Initial stiffness increased by 35.3% with the use of opening reinforcement. Specimens without openings dissipated more energy in the plastic region, while opening reinforcement contributed positively up to peak load. Ductility decreased with the presence of openings, but improved with reinforcement.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9364,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering\",\"volume\":\"23 8\",\"pages\":\"3421 - 3449\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10518-025-02180-3.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10518-025-02180-3\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10518-025-02180-3","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

加固低侧刚度结构的常用方法是在钢筋混凝土(RC)框架内增加现浇剪力墙。然而,由于建筑和安装的要求,在加固工程中剪力墙的开口可能是不可避免的。在本研究中,通过考虑开孔和不开孔的情况,研究了剪力墙对结构加固的影响。作为研究的一部分,共生产了四个不合格的RC框架(1/3比例,单层,单跨),反映了在地震破坏结构中观察到的常见缺陷。其中一个框架被选为参考试件,没有进行加固,而其他框架则用带开口和不带开口的钢筋混凝土剪力墙进行加固。在其中一个有开口的剪力墙中,在土耳其建筑地震规范(tbc -2018)规定的开口周围应用了特殊的加固细节,并研究了这些加固对结构行为的影响。所有试件均在模拟地震的重复和可逆荷载下进行了试验。根据结构性能参数对实验结果进行了评价。与未加固试件相比,未开孔剪力墙的侧载能力提高了约40%。在开口周围应用tbec -2018合规加固,相对于未加固的开口情况,容量提高了16%。采用开口配筋后,初始刚度提高了35.3%。不开孔的试件在塑性区耗散更多的能量,而开孔加固对峰值荷载的贡献为正。塑性随开孔的存在而降低,但随配筋的增加而提高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Effect of shear wall opening and reinforcement around opening on the structural strengthening

A common method for strengthening structures with low lateral stiffness is to add cast-in-place shear walls within a reinforced concrete (RC) frame. However, shear wall openings may be unavoidable in strengthening works due to architectural and installation requirements. In this study, the effect of the shear wall on structural strengthening was investigated by considering the cases with and without openings. A total of four inadequate RC frames (1/3 scale, single-story, single-span), reflecting common deficiencies observed in earthquake-damaged structures, were produced as part of the study. One of these frames was selected as a reference specimen and was not strengthened, while the others were strengthened with RC shear walls with and without openings. In one of the shear walls with an opening, special reinforcement details around the opening specified in the Turkish Building Earthquake Code (TBEC-2018) were applied and the effects of these reinforcements on the structural behavior were investigated. All specimens were tested under repeated and reversible loads simulating an earthquake. The experimental results were evaluated in terms of structural behavior parameters. The shear wall without opening increased the lateral load capacity by approximately 40% compared to the unstrengthened specimen. The application of TBEC-2018-compliant reinforcement around the opening improved the capacity by 16% relative to the unreinforced opening case. Initial stiffness increased by 35.3% with the use of opening reinforcement. Specimens without openings dissipated more energy in the plastic region, while opening reinforcement contributed positively up to peak load. Ductility decreased with the presence of openings, but improved with reinforcement.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering
Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering 工程技术-地球科学综合
CiteScore
8.90
自引率
19.60%
发文量
263
审稿时长
7.5 months
期刊介绍: Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering presents original, peer-reviewed papers on research related to the broad spectrum of earthquake engineering. The journal offers a forum for presentation and discussion of such matters as European damaging earthquakes, new developments in earthquake regulations, and national policies applied after major seismic events, including strengthening of existing buildings. Coverage includes seismic hazard studies and methods for mitigation of risk; earthquake source mechanism and strong motion characterization and their use for engineering applications; geological and geotechnical site conditions under earthquake excitations; cyclic behavior of soils; analysis and design of earth structures and foundations under seismic conditions; zonation and microzonation methodologies; earthquake scenarios and vulnerability assessments; earthquake codes and improvements, and much more. This is the Official Publication of the European Association for Earthquake Engineering.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信