中国农村自建房屋抗震性能及改进研究

IF 4.1 2区 工程技术 Q2 ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL
Jianxiong Zhang, Dewen Liu, Rui Sun, Yong Ding, Yunlong Zhao, Jia Wang, Weiwei Sun
{"title":"中国农村自建房屋抗震性能及改进研究","authors":"Jianxiong Zhang,&nbsp;Dewen Liu,&nbsp;Rui Sun,&nbsp;Yong Ding,&nbsp;Yunlong Zhao,&nbsp;Jia Wang,&nbsp;Weiwei Sun","doi":"10.1007/s10518-025-02119-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This study focuses on the rural self-built house with a frame bottom floor and three masonry upper floors. This model is a prototype of traditional self-built houses still prevalent in Chinese rural areas, which pose a significant risk of damage during earthquakes due to the structural weaknesses of the first and second floors. Despite its vulnerability, many residents continue to construct such houses due to their comfort and convenience. By subjecting the structure to seven seismic records, we analyze the seismic responses of the first floor frame structure, first floor shear wall structure, first floor seismic isolation structure, and second floor seismic isolation structure. A comparative assessment of the seismic performance of these four structures under earthquake conditions is conducted. The study indicates that after an earthquake, the primary damage to the building structure occurs in the first floor and the top node. The first floor shear wall structure reduces seismic actions to some extent. The seismic isolation story effectively prolongs the structural period and prevents resonance with the site’s predominant period. When first floor seismic isolation structure is adopted, the acceleration, inter-story shear, inter-story drift and base shear response of the structure are reduced to 19.9%, 20.2%, 30.9%, and 26.0% of the first floor frame structure, and the effect is very significant. Second floor seismic isolation structure is more effective than first floor shear wall structure, and first floor seismic isolation structure surpasses both second floor seismic isolation structure and first floor shear wall structure. The use of first floor seismic isolation structure, second floor seismic isolation structure, and first floor shear wall structure enhances structural performance and effectively mitigates demand to reinforced concrete and masonry elements of traditional earthquake-resistant structures during seismic events.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":9364,"journal":{"name":"Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering","volume":"23 8","pages":"3327 - 3351"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Research on seismic performance and improvement of Chinese rural self-built houses\",\"authors\":\"Jianxiong Zhang,&nbsp;Dewen Liu,&nbsp;Rui Sun,&nbsp;Yong Ding,&nbsp;Yunlong Zhao,&nbsp;Jia Wang,&nbsp;Weiwei Sun\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10518-025-02119-8\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>This study focuses on the rural self-built house with a frame bottom floor and three masonry upper floors. This model is a prototype of traditional self-built houses still prevalent in Chinese rural areas, which pose a significant risk of damage during earthquakes due to the structural weaknesses of the first and second floors. Despite its vulnerability, many residents continue to construct such houses due to their comfort and convenience. By subjecting the structure to seven seismic records, we analyze the seismic responses of the first floor frame structure, first floor shear wall structure, first floor seismic isolation structure, and second floor seismic isolation structure. A comparative assessment of the seismic performance of these four structures under earthquake conditions is conducted. The study indicates that after an earthquake, the primary damage to the building structure occurs in the first floor and the top node. The first floor shear wall structure reduces seismic actions to some extent. The seismic isolation story effectively prolongs the structural period and prevents resonance with the site’s predominant period. When first floor seismic isolation structure is adopted, the acceleration, inter-story shear, inter-story drift and base shear response of the structure are reduced to 19.9%, 20.2%, 30.9%, and 26.0% of the first floor frame structure, and the effect is very significant. Second floor seismic isolation structure is more effective than first floor shear wall structure, and first floor seismic isolation structure surpasses both second floor seismic isolation structure and first floor shear wall structure. The use of first floor seismic isolation structure, second floor seismic isolation structure, and first floor shear wall structure enhances structural performance and effectively mitigates demand to reinforced concrete and masonry elements of traditional earthquake-resistant structures during seismic events.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9364,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering\",\"volume\":\"23 8\",\"pages\":\"3327 - 3351\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10518-025-02119-8\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10518-025-02119-8","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究以底层为框架,上层为三层砖石结构的农村自建房屋为研究对象。这个模型是传统自建房屋的原型,在中国农村地区仍然普遍存在,由于第一层和第二层的结构薄弱,在地震中存在很大的破坏风险。尽管它很脆弱,但由于舒适和方便,许多居民继续建造这样的房子。通过对该结构进行7次地震记录,分析了一层框架结构、一层剪力墙结构、一层隔震结构和二层隔震结构的地震反应。对这四种结构在地震条件下的抗震性能进行了比较评价。研究表明,地震发生后,建筑物结构的主要破坏发生在一楼和顶部节点。一楼剪力墙结构在一定程度上减小了地震作用。隔震层有效地延长了结构周期,防止了与场地主周期的共振。采用一楼隔震结构时,结构的加速度、层间剪力、层间位移和基底剪力响应分别降低到一楼框架结构的19.9%、20.2%、30.9%和26.0%,效果非常显著。二层隔震结构效果优于一楼剪力墙结构,且一楼隔震结构优于二楼隔震结构和一楼剪力墙结构。一层隔震结构、二层隔震结构和一层剪力墙结构的使用提高了结构性能,有效地减少了地震事件对传统抗震结构的钢筋混凝土和砌体构件的需求。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Research on seismic performance and improvement of Chinese rural self-built houses

Research on seismic performance and improvement of Chinese rural self-built houses

This study focuses on the rural self-built house with a frame bottom floor and three masonry upper floors. This model is a prototype of traditional self-built houses still prevalent in Chinese rural areas, which pose a significant risk of damage during earthquakes due to the structural weaknesses of the first and second floors. Despite its vulnerability, many residents continue to construct such houses due to their comfort and convenience. By subjecting the structure to seven seismic records, we analyze the seismic responses of the first floor frame structure, first floor shear wall structure, first floor seismic isolation structure, and second floor seismic isolation structure. A comparative assessment of the seismic performance of these four structures under earthquake conditions is conducted. The study indicates that after an earthquake, the primary damage to the building structure occurs in the first floor and the top node. The first floor shear wall structure reduces seismic actions to some extent. The seismic isolation story effectively prolongs the structural period and prevents resonance with the site’s predominant period. When first floor seismic isolation structure is adopted, the acceleration, inter-story shear, inter-story drift and base shear response of the structure are reduced to 19.9%, 20.2%, 30.9%, and 26.0% of the first floor frame structure, and the effect is very significant. Second floor seismic isolation structure is more effective than first floor shear wall structure, and first floor seismic isolation structure surpasses both second floor seismic isolation structure and first floor shear wall structure. The use of first floor seismic isolation structure, second floor seismic isolation structure, and first floor shear wall structure enhances structural performance and effectively mitigates demand to reinforced concrete and masonry elements of traditional earthquake-resistant structures during seismic events.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering
Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering 工程技术-地球科学综合
CiteScore
8.90
自引率
19.60%
发文量
263
审稿时长
7.5 months
期刊介绍: Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering presents original, peer-reviewed papers on research related to the broad spectrum of earthquake engineering. The journal offers a forum for presentation and discussion of such matters as European damaging earthquakes, new developments in earthquake regulations, and national policies applied after major seismic events, including strengthening of existing buildings. Coverage includes seismic hazard studies and methods for mitigation of risk; earthquake source mechanism and strong motion characterization and their use for engineering applications; geological and geotechnical site conditions under earthquake excitations; cyclic behavior of soils; analysis and design of earth structures and foundations under seismic conditions; zonation and microzonation methodologies; earthquake scenarios and vulnerability assessments; earthquake codes and improvements, and much more. This is the Official Publication of the European Association for Earthquake Engineering.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信