WRF模式对印度东海岸双城强降雨事件实时预测的评估

IF 1.9 4区 地球科学 Q2 GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS
Alugula Boyaj, P. Sinha, N. R. Karrevula, Raghu Nadimpalli, V. Vinoj, Sahidul Islam, Manoj Khare, U. C. Mohanty
{"title":"WRF模式对印度东海岸双城强降雨事件实时预测的评估","authors":"Alugula Boyaj,&nbsp;P. Sinha,&nbsp;N. R. Karrevula,&nbsp;Raghu Nadimpalli,&nbsp;V. Vinoj,&nbsp;Sahidul Islam,&nbsp;Manoj Khare,&nbsp;U. C. Mohanty","doi":"10.1007/s00024-025-03734-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The East coast of India, including Bhubaneswar and Cuttack in Odisha, often faces heavy rainfall events (HREs), leading to floods and significant loss of life and property. The present study evaluates the performance of a previously customized WRF model, forced by NCEP-GFS, for its capabilities in HRE forecasting and compares it with the India Meteorological Department's Global Forecast System (IMD-GFS) model in predicting HREs in quasi-operational mode. Their performance is assessed against observed daily rainfall station data, considering 23 HREs that occurred during the 2022 monsoon season. Our findings indicate that the optimum WRF configuration successfully captures both the occurrence of HREs and their magnitudes. Results show that the optimized WRF model effectively captures both the occurrence and intensity of HREs, achieving an overall success rate of 64% compared to 16% for the IMD-GFS at the station level. Concerning various lead times, the WRF (IMD-GFS) exhibited success rates of 45% (8%), 40% (8%), and 46% (4%) for day-1, day-2, and day-3 lead times, respectively. Regarding rainfall magnitude, the WRF model showed a 30% overestimation, while the IMD-GFS delineated a 65% underestimation. Furthermore, the optimized WRF model effectively predicts widespread HREs influenced by large-scale factors. The differences in results between the WRF and IMD-GFS models can mostly be attributed to variations in resolution and model configuration. However, the present study emphasizes the need for dynamically downscaling using high-resolution mesoscale models to accurately predict city-scale HREs in urban regions for its usefulness by stakeholders.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":21078,"journal":{"name":"pure and applied geophysics","volume":"182 6","pages":"2655 - 2673"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessment of the WRF Model for Real-Time Prediction of Heavy Rainfall Events over the Twin Cities of East Coast of India\",\"authors\":\"Alugula Boyaj,&nbsp;P. Sinha,&nbsp;N. R. Karrevula,&nbsp;Raghu Nadimpalli,&nbsp;V. Vinoj,&nbsp;Sahidul Islam,&nbsp;Manoj Khare,&nbsp;U. C. Mohanty\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00024-025-03734-x\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>The East coast of India, including Bhubaneswar and Cuttack in Odisha, often faces heavy rainfall events (HREs), leading to floods and significant loss of life and property. The present study evaluates the performance of a previously customized WRF model, forced by NCEP-GFS, for its capabilities in HRE forecasting and compares it with the India Meteorological Department's Global Forecast System (IMD-GFS) model in predicting HREs in quasi-operational mode. Their performance is assessed against observed daily rainfall station data, considering 23 HREs that occurred during the 2022 monsoon season. Our findings indicate that the optimum WRF configuration successfully captures both the occurrence of HREs and their magnitudes. Results show that the optimized WRF model effectively captures both the occurrence and intensity of HREs, achieving an overall success rate of 64% compared to 16% for the IMD-GFS at the station level. Concerning various lead times, the WRF (IMD-GFS) exhibited success rates of 45% (8%), 40% (8%), and 46% (4%) for day-1, day-2, and day-3 lead times, respectively. Regarding rainfall magnitude, the WRF model showed a 30% overestimation, while the IMD-GFS delineated a 65% underestimation. Furthermore, the optimized WRF model effectively predicts widespread HREs influenced by large-scale factors. The differences in results between the WRF and IMD-GFS models can mostly be attributed to variations in resolution and model configuration. However, the present study emphasizes the need for dynamically downscaling using high-resolution mesoscale models to accurately predict city-scale HREs in urban regions for its usefulness by stakeholders.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21078,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"pure and applied geophysics\",\"volume\":\"182 6\",\"pages\":\"2655 - 2673\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"pure and applied geophysics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"89\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00024-025-03734-x\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"地球科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"pure and applied geophysics","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00024-025-03734-x","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

印度东海岸,包括奥里萨邦的布巴内斯瓦尔和卡塔克,经常面临强降雨事件,导致洪水和重大的生命和财产损失。本研究评估了以前由NCEP-GFS强制定制的WRF模型在HRE预报方面的性能,并将其与印度气象部门的全球预报系统(IMD-GFS)模型在准业务模式下预测HRE的能力进行了比较。它们的性能是根据观测到的日降雨量数据进行评估的,考虑到2022年季风季节发生的23个HREs。研究结果表明,最优WRF配置成功捕获了HREs的发生和强度。结果表明,优化后的WRF模型有效捕获了HREs的发生和强度,总体成功率为64%,而IMD-GFS在站水平上的成功率为16%。对于不同的交货期,WRF (IMD-GFS)在第1天、第2天和第3天的交货期成功率分别为45%(8%)、40%(8%)和46%(4%)。关于降雨量,WRF模式高估了30%,而IMD-GFS则低估了65%。此外,优化后的WRF模型能有效预测受大尺度因素影响的广域HREs。WRF和IMD-GFS模式之间结果的差异主要归因于分辨率和模式配置的差异。然而,本研究强调需要使用高分辨率中尺度模型动态降尺度,以准确预测城市地区的城市尺度HREs,以使其对利益相关者有用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Assessment of the WRF Model for Real-Time Prediction of Heavy Rainfall Events over the Twin Cities of East Coast of India

The East coast of India, including Bhubaneswar and Cuttack in Odisha, often faces heavy rainfall events (HREs), leading to floods and significant loss of life and property. The present study evaluates the performance of a previously customized WRF model, forced by NCEP-GFS, for its capabilities in HRE forecasting and compares it with the India Meteorological Department's Global Forecast System (IMD-GFS) model in predicting HREs in quasi-operational mode. Their performance is assessed against observed daily rainfall station data, considering 23 HREs that occurred during the 2022 monsoon season. Our findings indicate that the optimum WRF configuration successfully captures both the occurrence of HREs and their magnitudes. Results show that the optimized WRF model effectively captures both the occurrence and intensity of HREs, achieving an overall success rate of 64% compared to 16% for the IMD-GFS at the station level. Concerning various lead times, the WRF (IMD-GFS) exhibited success rates of 45% (8%), 40% (8%), and 46% (4%) for day-1, day-2, and day-3 lead times, respectively. Regarding rainfall magnitude, the WRF model showed a 30% overestimation, while the IMD-GFS delineated a 65% underestimation. Furthermore, the optimized WRF model effectively predicts widespread HREs influenced by large-scale factors. The differences in results between the WRF and IMD-GFS models can mostly be attributed to variations in resolution and model configuration. However, the present study emphasizes the need for dynamically downscaling using high-resolution mesoscale models to accurately predict city-scale HREs in urban regions for its usefulness by stakeholders.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
pure and applied geophysics
pure and applied geophysics 地学-地球化学与地球物理
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
5.00%
发文量
240
审稿时长
9.8 months
期刊介绍: pure and applied geophysics (pageoph), a continuation of the journal "Geofisica pura e applicata", publishes original scientific contributions in the fields of solid Earth, atmospheric and oceanic sciences. Regular and special issues feature thought-provoking reports on active areas of current research and state-of-the-art surveys. Long running journal, founded in 1939 as Geofisica pura e applicata Publishes peer-reviewed original scientific contributions and state-of-the-art surveys in solid earth and atmospheric sciences Features thought-provoking reports on active areas of current research and is a major source for publications on tsunami research Coverage extends to research topics in oceanic sciences See Instructions for Authors on the right hand side.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信