{"title":"基于广义加性方法的液化横向扩展评价中最佳地震动强度测度和输入参数的确定","authors":"Jilei Hu, Bin Xiong, Nima Pirhadi","doi":"10.1007/s11440-025-02607-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Seismic intensity measures (IMs) play an important role in predicting liquefaction-induced lateral spreading. Many studies identified the optimal IMs for estimating lateral spreading without considering soil and topography parameters, and their findings are based on numerical simulation. These inadequate considerations may lead to impractical and incomplete results. In this paper, therefore, a large amount of real historical data containing multiple factors is collected, in which abnormal or inappropriate data are removed. Thirty-one IMs are calculated using the bidirectional ground motion records from historical earthquake records. Based on historical field data and the corresponding 31 IMs, the optimal IM is identified according to some criteria considering soil and topography parameters including correlation, efficiency, proficiency, and sufficiency analysis. The results show that the composite acceleration intensity<i> I</i><sub><i>a</i></sub> satisfies the four criteria. Additionally, the key input parameters (including <i>I</i><sub><i>a</i></sub>) affecting lateral spreading were analyzed using the generalized additive model (GAM). The average fine content and mean grain size are proposed to be removed in the construction of models, which could significantly reduce testing costs and be more conducive to engineering applications. The proposed GAM with four input parameters, <i>I</i><sub><i>a</i></sub>, <i>T</i><sub>15</sub> (cumulative layers thickness with (<i>N</i><sub>1</sub>)<sub>60</sub> < 15), <i>S</i> (Slope), and <i>W</i> (free face radio), performs the best after comparing with other machine learning methods and existing empirical models. A flowchart of GAM usage was provided to the engineers.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":49308,"journal":{"name":"Acta Geotechnica","volume":"20 8","pages":"3887 - 3903"},"PeriodicalIF":5.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Identification of the optimal ground motion intensity measure and input parameters for assessing liquefaction-induced lateral spreading based on the generalized additive method\",\"authors\":\"Jilei Hu, Bin Xiong, Nima Pirhadi\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11440-025-02607-w\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Seismic intensity measures (IMs) play an important role in predicting liquefaction-induced lateral spreading. Many studies identified the optimal IMs for estimating lateral spreading without considering soil and topography parameters, and their findings are based on numerical simulation. These inadequate considerations may lead to impractical and incomplete results. In this paper, therefore, a large amount of real historical data containing multiple factors is collected, in which abnormal or inappropriate data are removed. Thirty-one IMs are calculated using the bidirectional ground motion records from historical earthquake records. Based on historical field data and the corresponding 31 IMs, the optimal IM is identified according to some criteria considering soil and topography parameters including correlation, efficiency, proficiency, and sufficiency analysis. The results show that the composite acceleration intensity<i> I</i><sub><i>a</i></sub> satisfies the four criteria. Additionally, the key input parameters (including <i>I</i><sub><i>a</i></sub>) affecting lateral spreading were analyzed using the generalized additive model (GAM). The average fine content and mean grain size are proposed to be removed in the construction of models, which could significantly reduce testing costs and be more conducive to engineering applications. The proposed GAM with four input parameters, <i>I</i><sub><i>a</i></sub>, <i>T</i><sub>15</sub> (cumulative layers thickness with (<i>N</i><sub>1</sub>)<sub>60</sub> < 15), <i>S</i> (Slope), and <i>W</i> (free face radio), performs the best after comparing with other machine learning methods and existing empirical models. A flowchart of GAM usage was provided to the engineers.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49308,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Acta Geotechnica\",\"volume\":\"20 8\",\"pages\":\"3887 - 3903\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Acta Geotechnica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11440-025-02607-w\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Geotechnica","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11440-025-02607-w","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
地震烈度测量在预测液化引起的横向扩展中起着重要的作用。许多研究在不考虑土壤和地形参数的情况下确定了估算横向扩展的最佳IMs,这些研究结果是基于数值模拟的。这些不充分的考虑可能导致不切实际和不完整的结果。因此,本文收集了大量包含多因素的真实历史数据,剔除了其中异常或不合适的数据。利用历史地震记录中的双向地震动记录,计算了31个imm。根据历史现场数据和相应的31个IMs,根据考虑土壤和地形参数的一些标准,包括相关性、效率、熟练度和充分性分析,确定了最优IMs。结果表明,复合加速度强度Ia满足上述四个条件。此外,采用广义加性模型(GAM)分析了影响横向扩散的关键输入参数(包括Ia)。建议在构建模型时去掉平均细粒含量和平均粒度,这样可以显著降低测试成本,更有利于工程应用。与其他机器学习方法和现有经验模型相比,本文提出的GAM具有四个输入参数Ia, T15 ((N1)60 <; 15的累积层厚度),S(斜率)和W (free face radio),表现最好。向工程师们提供了GAM的使用流程图。
Identification of the optimal ground motion intensity measure and input parameters for assessing liquefaction-induced lateral spreading based on the generalized additive method
Seismic intensity measures (IMs) play an important role in predicting liquefaction-induced lateral spreading. Many studies identified the optimal IMs for estimating lateral spreading without considering soil and topography parameters, and their findings are based on numerical simulation. These inadequate considerations may lead to impractical and incomplete results. In this paper, therefore, a large amount of real historical data containing multiple factors is collected, in which abnormal or inappropriate data are removed. Thirty-one IMs are calculated using the bidirectional ground motion records from historical earthquake records. Based on historical field data and the corresponding 31 IMs, the optimal IM is identified according to some criteria considering soil and topography parameters including correlation, efficiency, proficiency, and sufficiency analysis. The results show that the composite acceleration intensity Ia satisfies the four criteria. Additionally, the key input parameters (including Ia) affecting lateral spreading were analyzed using the generalized additive model (GAM). The average fine content and mean grain size are proposed to be removed in the construction of models, which could significantly reduce testing costs and be more conducive to engineering applications. The proposed GAM with four input parameters, Ia, T15 (cumulative layers thickness with (N1)60 < 15), S (Slope), and W (free face radio), performs the best after comparing with other machine learning methods and existing empirical models. A flowchart of GAM usage was provided to the engineers.
期刊介绍:
Acta Geotechnica is an international journal devoted to the publication and dissemination of basic and applied research in geoengineering – an interdisciplinary field dealing with geomaterials such as soils and rocks. Coverage emphasizes the interplay between geomechanical models and their engineering applications. The journal presents original research papers on fundamental concepts in geomechanics and their novel applications in geoengineering based on experimental, analytical and/or numerical approaches. The main purpose of the journal is to foster understanding of the fundamental mechanisms behind the phenomena and processes in geomaterials, from kilometer-scale problems as they occur in geoscience, and down to the nano-scale, with their potential impact on geoengineering. The journal strives to report and archive progress in the field in a timely manner, presenting research papers, review articles, short notes and letters to the editors.