{"title":"用包合物的结合常数理论计算难水溶性化合物的溶解度和其他参数:以环糊精白桦衍生物为例","authors":"Viktoria V. Sursyakova, Anatoly I. Rubaylo","doi":"10.1007/s10953-025-01450-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Experimental determination of solubility is a time-consuming procedure with relatively high reagent consumption. The solubility of poorly water-soluble compounds in solubilizer solutions can be calculated from the values of their binding constants (also called stability, formation, or association constants) determined by other methods that require less time and reagents for research. For the case of the formation of both 1:1 and 1:2 complexes, comparison of solubility based on binding constant values is impossible without calculations. The paper considers the theoretical relationship of the solubility to the binding constants for this situation, as well as to the intrinsic solubility in the absence of solubilizer in solution. In addition, equations are presented for calculating the solubilizer concentration to obtain the desired solubility. Assumptions and limitations for such calculations are discussed. Demonstrative calculations were carried out using literature data on binding constants, previously determined by the authors using affinity capillary electrophoresis, for betulin 3,28-diphthalate and 3,28-disuccinate with six cyclodextrins: β-cyclodextrin (β-CD), hydroxypropyl-β-CD, randomly methylated β-CD, dimethyl-β-CD, γ-CD, and hydroxypropyl-γ-CD. It was shown that for calculating solubility at high values of binding constants it is important to use not the total concentration of the solubilizer in solution, but its equilibrium concentration. Higher values of the binding constants were found to do not always provide higher solubility. It turned out that the difference in solubilizing capacity between solubilizers may not be too significant at relatively high values of solubility in the absence of a solubilizer.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":666,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Solution Chemistry","volume":"54 7","pages":"850 - 863"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Theoretical Calculation of the Solubility and Other Parameters for Poorly Water-Soluble Compounds from Binding Constants of Inclusion Complexes: The Examples of Betulin Derivatives with Cyclodextrins\",\"authors\":\"Viktoria V. Sursyakova, Anatoly I. Rubaylo\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10953-025-01450-7\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Experimental determination of solubility is a time-consuming procedure with relatively high reagent consumption. The solubility of poorly water-soluble compounds in solubilizer solutions can be calculated from the values of their binding constants (also called stability, formation, or association constants) determined by other methods that require less time and reagents for research. For the case of the formation of both 1:1 and 1:2 complexes, comparison of solubility based on binding constant values is impossible without calculations. The paper considers the theoretical relationship of the solubility to the binding constants for this situation, as well as to the intrinsic solubility in the absence of solubilizer in solution. In addition, equations are presented for calculating the solubilizer concentration to obtain the desired solubility. Assumptions and limitations for such calculations are discussed. Demonstrative calculations were carried out using literature data on binding constants, previously determined by the authors using affinity capillary electrophoresis, for betulin 3,28-diphthalate and 3,28-disuccinate with six cyclodextrins: β-cyclodextrin (β-CD), hydroxypropyl-β-CD, randomly methylated β-CD, dimethyl-β-CD, γ-CD, and hydroxypropyl-γ-CD. It was shown that for calculating solubility at high values of binding constants it is important to use not the total concentration of the solubilizer in solution, but its equilibrium concentration. Higher values of the binding constants were found to do not always provide higher solubility. It turned out that the difference in solubilizing capacity between solubilizers may not be too significant at relatively high values of solubility in the absence of a solubilizer.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":666,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Solution Chemistry\",\"volume\":\"54 7\",\"pages\":\"850 - 863\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Solution Chemistry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"92\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10953-025-01450-7\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"化学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"CHEMISTRY, PHYSICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Solution Chemistry","FirstCategoryId":"92","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10953-025-01450-7","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, PHYSICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
Theoretical Calculation of the Solubility and Other Parameters for Poorly Water-Soluble Compounds from Binding Constants of Inclusion Complexes: The Examples of Betulin Derivatives with Cyclodextrins
Experimental determination of solubility is a time-consuming procedure with relatively high reagent consumption. The solubility of poorly water-soluble compounds in solubilizer solutions can be calculated from the values of their binding constants (also called stability, formation, or association constants) determined by other methods that require less time and reagents for research. For the case of the formation of both 1:1 and 1:2 complexes, comparison of solubility based on binding constant values is impossible without calculations. The paper considers the theoretical relationship of the solubility to the binding constants for this situation, as well as to the intrinsic solubility in the absence of solubilizer in solution. In addition, equations are presented for calculating the solubilizer concentration to obtain the desired solubility. Assumptions and limitations for such calculations are discussed. Demonstrative calculations were carried out using literature data on binding constants, previously determined by the authors using affinity capillary electrophoresis, for betulin 3,28-diphthalate and 3,28-disuccinate with six cyclodextrins: β-cyclodextrin (β-CD), hydroxypropyl-β-CD, randomly methylated β-CD, dimethyl-β-CD, γ-CD, and hydroxypropyl-γ-CD. It was shown that for calculating solubility at high values of binding constants it is important to use not the total concentration of the solubilizer in solution, but its equilibrium concentration. Higher values of the binding constants were found to do not always provide higher solubility. It turned out that the difference in solubilizing capacity between solubilizers may not be too significant at relatively high values of solubility in the absence of a solubilizer.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Solution Chemistry offers a forum for research on the physical chemistry of liquid solutions in such fields as physical chemistry, chemical physics, molecular biology, statistical mechanics, biochemistry, and biophysics. The emphasis is on papers in which the solvent plays a dominant rather than incidental role. Featured topics include experimental investigations of the dielectric, spectroscopic, thermodynamic, transport, or relaxation properties of both electrolytes and nonelectrolytes in liquid solutions.