识别本科化学实验教学中的技能不平等

IF 3.2 2区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Aaron G. Jimenez and David P. August
{"title":"识别本科化学实验教学中的技能不平等","authors":"Aaron G. Jimenez and David P. August","doi":"10.1039/D5RP00129C","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p >Designing effective laboratory courses that take prior knowledge and experience into account are important for reducing inequalities and skill gaps within higher education. Whilst many anecdotal trends are known, this study aims to provide quantitative confirmation of skill gaps within first year undergraduate students. Students that studied A-level chemistry considered themselves both more experienced and more confident in a number of lab skills when compared to students who had completed either Scottish Highers or the International Baccalaureate—with skills involving more sophisticated equipment the most likely to differ. A similar relationship was observed between private and state funded schooling respectively, perhaps linked to the fact that a much higher proportion of A-level respondents were privately educated. International students displayed similar experience and confidence in general lab skills compared to students from the UK, but were less confident in their written and spoken English skill—despite the fact that 91% of them completed their final school education in English. International students were also less confident in their ability to design experimental methodologies. Covid-19 continues to have an impact on recent student cohorts, with Scottish students experiencing higher levels of disruption. It is hoped that confirmation of these long-held preconceptions, and the identification of the specific lab skills that vary most with educational background, will help future course design provide focused support to the students who need it most.</p>","PeriodicalId":69,"journal":{"name":"Chemistry Education Research and Practice","volume":" 4","pages":" 926-935"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Identifying skill inequalities in undergraduate chemistry laboratory teaching†\",\"authors\":\"Aaron G. Jimenez and David P. August\",\"doi\":\"10.1039/D5RP00129C\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p >Designing effective laboratory courses that take prior knowledge and experience into account are important for reducing inequalities and skill gaps within higher education. Whilst many anecdotal trends are known, this study aims to provide quantitative confirmation of skill gaps within first year undergraduate students. Students that studied A-level chemistry considered themselves both more experienced and more confident in a number of lab skills when compared to students who had completed either Scottish Highers or the International Baccalaureate—with skills involving more sophisticated equipment the most likely to differ. A similar relationship was observed between private and state funded schooling respectively, perhaps linked to the fact that a much higher proportion of A-level respondents were privately educated. International students displayed similar experience and confidence in general lab skills compared to students from the UK, but were less confident in their written and spoken English skill—despite the fact that 91% of them completed their final school education in English. International students were also less confident in their ability to design experimental methodologies. Covid-19 continues to have an impact on recent student cohorts, with Scottish students experiencing higher levels of disruption. It is hoped that confirmation of these long-held preconceptions, and the identification of the specific lab skills that vary most with educational background, will help future course design provide focused support to the students who need it most.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":69,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Chemistry Education Research and Practice\",\"volume\":\" 4\",\"pages\":\" 926-935\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Chemistry Education Research and Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"95\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlelanding/2025/rp/d5rp00129c\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chemistry Education Research and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlelanding/2025/rp/d5rp00129c","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

设计考虑到先前知识和经验的有效实验课程对于减少高等教育中的不平等和技能差距非常重要。虽然许多轶事趋势是已知的,但本研究旨在为一年级本科生的技能差距提供定量确认。与完成苏格兰高级或国际文凭课程的学生相比,学习a -level化学的学生认为自己在许多实验室技能方面更有经验,也更有信心,而涉及更复杂设备的技能最有可能不同。在私立学校和公立学校之间也分别观察到类似的关系,这可能与更高比例的A-level受访者接受私立教育有关。与英国学生相比,国际学生在一般实验室技能方面表现出相似的经验和信心,但在书面和口语方面的信心较弱——尽管91%的国际学生用英语完成了最后的学校教育。国际学生对自己设计实验方法的能力也缺乏信心。新冠肺炎继续对近期的学生群体产生影响,苏格兰学生受到的干扰程度更高。我们希望确认这些长期存在的先入为主的观念,并识别出不同教育背景的特定实验技能,将有助于未来的课程设计为最需要的学生提供有针对性的支持。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Identifying skill inequalities in undergraduate chemistry laboratory teaching†

Designing effective laboratory courses that take prior knowledge and experience into account are important for reducing inequalities and skill gaps within higher education. Whilst many anecdotal trends are known, this study aims to provide quantitative confirmation of skill gaps within first year undergraduate students. Students that studied A-level chemistry considered themselves both more experienced and more confident in a number of lab skills when compared to students who had completed either Scottish Highers or the International Baccalaureate—with skills involving more sophisticated equipment the most likely to differ. A similar relationship was observed between private and state funded schooling respectively, perhaps linked to the fact that a much higher proportion of A-level respondents were privately educated. International students displayed similar experience and confidence in general lab skills compared to students from the UK, but were less confident in their written and spoken English skill—despite the fact that 91% of them completed their final school education in English. International students were also less confident in their ability to design experimental methodologies. Covid-19 continues to have an impact on recent student cohorts, with Scottish students experiencing higher levels of disruption. It is hoped that confirmation of these long-held preconceptions, and the identification of the specific lab skills that vary most with educational background, will help future course design provide focused support to the students who need it most.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
26.70%
发文量
64
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The journal for teachers, researchers and other practitioners in chemistry education.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信