林龄和经营措施调节森林生态系统对干旱的响应

IF 12 1区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION
Longlong Ma, Jun Ma, Pu Yan, Feng Tian, Zhenhong Hu
{"title":"林龄和经营措施调节森林生态系统对干旱的响应","authors":"Longlong Ma,&nbsp;Jun Ma,&nbsp;Pu Yan,&nbsp;Feng Tian,&nbsp;Zhenhong Hu","doi":"10.1111/gcb.70511","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>We thank Li et al. (<span>2025</span>) for emphasizing the role of forest age in the responses of plantations to drought. Although forest age was included in our analysis, canopy height emerged as a stronger predictor (Ma et al. <span>2025</span>). Yet tree height or diameter at breast height does not always track chronological age (Au et al. <span>2022</span>). Indeed, several studies suggest that tree age may be more relevant than height in addressing global change, as older trees store more carbon in biomass and retain it as a carbon sink for longer periods than fast-growing younger trees (Piovesan and Biondi <span>2021</span>). However, the worldwide loss of old trees and reforestation dominated by young, even-aged stands (Lindenmayer et al. <span>2012</span>) makes it a critical research priority to quantify how tree age modulates responses of forest ecosystems to drought.</p><p>A global tree-ring synthesis of more than 20,000 trees showed that younger, canopy-dominant trees suffer greater drought-induced growth reductions but recover more quickly after drought (Au et al. <span>2022</span>). However, forest management can modulate drought responses by altering age structure, species composition, and canopy density (Manrique-Alba et al. <span>2022</span>; Liu et al. <span>2022</span>). Our study finds that plantations are more vulnerable to drought (Ma et al. <span>2025</span>), but this does not preclude the potential for tree diversity and management practices to mitigate drought impacts. Diverse forest structures and targeted management enhance resistance (Liu et al. <span>2022</span>). However, these effects are spatially heterogeneous and species-specific, and are constrained by stand characteristics (e.g., age, height) and site conditions (e.g., climate, soil nutrients) (Manrique-Alba et al. <span>2022</span>; Li et al. <span>2020</span>) (Figure 1). Our study reveals a temporal trade-off between drought resistance and resilience in plantations (Ma et al. <span>2025</span>), likely driven by legacy effects of early-stage management on subsequent drought responses. Therefore, assessing forest drought responses requires considering tree age and how management enhances plantation resilience by optimizing stand structure and resource allocation.</p><p>Key methods for assessing the responses of forest ecosystems to drought include dendrochronology, forest inventories, and remote sensing (Figure 1). Remote sensing enables real-time monitoring of ecosystem water status and growth dynamics through vegetation indices (NDVI, EVI), surface temperature, and canopy moisture, and also captures drought-induced physiological and structural changes across spatiotemporal scales (Tian et al. <span>2018</span>; Vicente-Serrano et al. <span>2013</span>). Tree-ring width, by contrast, which directly reflects variations in radial growth, provides a quantitative measure of growth response to drought at the individual tree scale (Gazol et al. <span>2018</span>; Vicente-Serrano et al. <span>2013</span>). Unfortunately, matched datasets of tree rings from plantations and natural forests remain scarce. Although local forest inventories can partly fill this data gap, their discontinuous time series limit assessments of long-term drought effects. To enhance the ecological stability of plantations under climate change, we propose a multi-scale, multi-metric framework integrating remote sensing, field observations, and tree-ring data, with explicit consideration of stand age, tree height, species composition, biodiversity, and management practices (Figure 1). This approach supports mechanistic understanding of drought responses and informs targeted afforestation and adaptation strategies.</p><p><b>Longlong Ma:</b> conceptualization, writing – review and editing. <b>Jun Ma:</b> writing – review and editing. <b>Pu Yan:</b> writing – original draft. <b>Feng Tian:</b> writing – original draft, writing – review and editing. <b>Zhenhong Hu:</b> conceptualization, writing – review and editing.</p><p>The authors declare no conflicts of interest.</p><p>This article is a Response to a Letter to the Editor by Li et al., https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.70509 regarding Ma et al., https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.70055.</p>","PeriodicalId":175,"journal":{"name":"Global Change Biology","volume":"31 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":12.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/gcb.70511","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Forest Age and Management Measures Regulate the Responses of Forest Ecosystem to Drought\",\"authors\":\"Longlong Ma,&nbsp;Jun Ma,&nbsp;Pu Yan,&nbsp;Feng Tian,&nbsp;Zhenhong Hu\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/gcb.70511\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>We thank Li et al. (<span>2025</span>) for emphasizing the role of forest age in the responses of plantations to drought. Although forest age was included in our analysis, canopy height emerged as a stronger predictor (Ma et al. <span>2025</span>). Yet tree height or diameter at breast height does not always track chronological age (Au et al. <span>2022</span>). Indeed, several studies suggest that tree age may be more relevant than height in addressing global change, as older trees store more carbon in biomass and retain it as a carbon sink for longer periods than fast-growing younger trees (Piovesan and Biondi <span>2021</span>). However, the worldwide loss of old trees and reforestation dominated by young, even-aged stands (Lindenmayer et al. <span>2012</span>) makes it a critical research priority to quantify how tree age modulates responses of forest ecosystems to drought.</p><p>A global tree-ring synthesis of more than 20,000 trees showed that younger, canopy-dominant trees suffer greater drought-induced growth reductions but recover more quickly after drought (Au et al. <span>2022</span>). However, forest management can modulate drought responses by altering age structure, species composition, and canopy density (Manrique-Alba et al. <span>2022</span>; Liu et al. <span>2022</span>). Our study finds that plantations are more vulnerable to drought (Ma et al. <span>2025</span>), but this does not preclude the potential for tree diversity and management practices to mitigate drought impacts. Diverse forest structures and targeted management enhance resistance (Liu et al. <span>2022</span>). However, these effects are spatially heterogeneous and species-specific, and are constrained by stand characteristics (e.g., age, height) and site conditions (e.g., climate, soil nutrients) (Manrique-Alba et al. <span>2022</span>; Li et al. <span>2020</span>) (Figure 1). Our study reveals a temporal trade-off between drought resistance and resilience in plantations (Ma et al. <span>2025</span>), likely driven by legacy effects of early-stage management on subsequent drought responses. Therefore, assessing forest drought responses requires considering tree age and how management enhances plantation resilience by optimizing stand structure and resource allocation.</p><p>Key methods for assessing the responses of forest ecosystems to drought include dendrochronology, forest inventories, and remote sensing (Figure 1). Remote sensing enables real-time monitoring of ecosystem water status and growth dynamics through vegetation indices (NDVI, EVI), surface temperature, and canopy moisture, and also captures drought-induced physiological and structural changes across spatiotemporal scales (Tian et al. <span>2018</span>; Vicente-Serrano et al. <span>2013</span>). Tree-ring width, by contrast, which directly reflects variations in radial growth, provides a quantitative measure of growth response to drought at the individual tree scale (Gazol et al. <span>2018</span>; Vicente-Serrano et al. <span>2013</span>). Unfortunately, matched datasets of tree rings from plantations and natural forests remain scarce. Although local forest inventories can partly fill this data gap, their discontinuous time series limit assessments of long-term drought effects. To enhance the ecological stability of plantations under climate change, we propose a multi-scale, multi-metric framework integrating remote sensing, field observations, and tree-ring data, with explicit consideration of stand age, tree height, species composition, biodiversity, and management practices (Figure 1). This approach supports mechanistic understanding of drought responses and informs targeted afforestation and adaptation strategies.</p><p><b>Longlong Ma:</b> conceptualization, writing – review and editing. <b>Jun Ma:</b> writing – review and editing. <b>Pu Yan:</b> writing – original draft. <b>Feng Tian:</b> writing – original draft, writing – review and editing. <b>Zhenhong Hu:</b> conceptualization, writing – review and editing.</p><p>The authors declare no conflicts of interest.</p><p>This article is a Response to a Letter to the Editor by Li et al., https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.70509 regarding Ma et al., https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.70055.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":175,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Global Change Biology\",\"volume\":\"31 9\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":12.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/gcb.70511\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Global Change Biology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/gcb.70511\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Change Biology","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/gcb.70511","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在气候变化不断加剧的背景下,森林生态系统对干旱的响应机制受到林分动态和管理措施的显著影响。迫切需要将物种特异性功能特征和管理干预策略整合到抗性-恢复力评估框架中,以提高对不同森林类型森林生态系统对干旱及其脆弱性的认识和预测能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Forest Age and Management Measures Regulate the Responses of Forest Ecosystem to Drought

Forest Age and Management Measures Regulate the Responses of Forest Ecosystem to Drought

We thank Li et al. (2025) for emphasizing the role of forest age in the responses of plantations to drought. Although forest age was included in our analysis, canopy height emerged as a stronger predictor (Ma et al. 2025). Yet tree height or diameter at breast height does not always track chronological age (Au et al. 2022). Indeed, several studies suggest that tree age may be more relevant than height in addressing global change, as older trees store more carbon in biomass and retain it as a carbon sink for longer periods than fast-growing younger trees (Piovesan and Biondi 2021). However, the worldwide loss of old trees and reforestation dominated by young, even-aged stands (Lindenmayer et al. 2012) makes it a critical research priority to quantify how tree age modulates responses of forest ecosystems to drought.

A global tree-ring synthesis of more than 20,000 trees showed that younger, canopy-dominant trees suffer greater drought-induced growth reductions but recover more quickly after drought (Au et al. 2022). However, forest management can modulate drought responses by altering age structure, species composition, and canopy density (Manrique-Alba et al. 2022; Liu et al. 2022). Our study finds that plantations are more vulnerable to drought (Ma et al. 2025), but this does not preclude the potential for tree diversity and management practices to mitigate drought impacts. Diverse forest structures and targeted management enhance resistance (Liu et al. 2022). However, these effects are spatially heterogeneous and species-specific, and are constrained by stand characteristics (e.g., age, height) and site conditions (e.g., climate, soil nutrients) (Manrique-Alba et al. 2022; Li et al. 2020) (Figure 1). Our study reveals a temporal trade-off between drought resistance and resilience in plantations (Ma et al. 2025), likely driven by legacy effects of early-stage management on subsequent drought responses. Therefore, assessing forest drought responses requires considering tree age and how management enhances plantation resilience by optimizing stand structure and resource allocation.

Key methods for assessing the responses of forest ecosystems to drought include dendrochronology, forest inventories, and remote sensing (Figure 1). Remote sensing enables real-time monitoring of ecosystem water status and growth dynamics through vegetation indices (NDVI, EVI), surface temperature, and canopy moisture, and also captures drought-induced physiological and structural changes across spatiotemporal scales (Tian et al. 2018; Vicente-Serrano et al. 2013). Tree-ring width, by contrast, which directly reflects variations in radial growth, provides a quantitative measure of growth response to drought at the individual tree scale (Gazol et al. 2018; Vicente-Serrano et al. 2013). Unfortunately, matched datasets of tree rings from plantations and natural forests remain scarce. Although local forest inventories can partly fill this data gap, their discontinuous time series limit assessments of long-term drought effects. To enhance the ecological stability of plantations under climate change, we propose a multi-scale, multi-metric framework integrating remote sensing, field observations, and tree-ring data, with explicit consideration of stand age, tree height, species composition, biodiversity, and management practices (Figure 1). This approach supports mechanistic understanding of drought responses and informs targeted afforestation and adaptation strategies.

Longlong Ma: conceptualization, writing – review and editing. Jun Ma: writing – review and editing. Pu Yan: writing – original draft. Feng Tian: writing – original draft, writing – review and editing. Zhenhong Hu: conceptualization, writing – review and editing.

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

This article is a Response to a Letter to the Editor by Li et al., https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.70509 regarding Ma et al., https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.70055.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Global Change Biology
Global Change Biology 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
21.50
自引率
5.20%
发文量
497
审稿时长
3.3 months
期刊介绍: Global Change Biology is an environmental change journal committed to shaping the future and addressing the world's most pressing challenges, including sustainability, climate change, environmental protection, food and water safety, and global health. Dedicated to fostering a profound understanding of the impacts of global change on biological systems and offering innovative solutions, the journal publishes a diverse range of content, including primary research articles, technical advances, research reviews, reports, opinions, perspectives, commentaries, and letters. Starting with the 2024 volume, Global Change Biology will transition to an online-only format, enhancing accessibility and contributing to the evolution of scholarly communication.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信