Ilana B Richman,Meghan E Lindsay,Jessica B Long,Eliza Epstein,Meera Sheffrin,Elizabeth R Berger
{"title":"老年妇女乳房x光检查的诊断率。","authors":"Ilana B Richman,Meghan E Lindsay,Jessica B Long,Eliza Epstein,Meera Sheffrin,Elizabeth R Berger","doi":"10.1093/jnci/djaf270","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND\r\nMammographic surveillance is common among older women with a history of breast cancer, but little is known about imaging outcomes in this population. The goal of this study was to describe short-term outcomes after surveillance mammography among older women, including use of subsequent imaging, cancer diagnosis, and positive predictive value.\r\n\r\nMETHODS\r\nThis was a longitudinal cohort study using SEER-Medicare data. We followed women diagnosed with breast cancer between 2003-2007 at age 67 or older until diagnosis of a second primary breast cancer, death, or end of follow up (2019). We used claims to identify surveillance mammograms. Outcomes included subsequent imaging, second primary breast cancer diagnosis, and positive predictive value after surveillance. Outcomes were identified based on proximity to surveillance mammography. We stratified analyses by age and time since diagnosis.\r\n\r\nRESULTS\r\nThe cohort included 33, 607 women who received 160,637 mammograms over a median 12.1 years. Subsequent imaging was performed after 115 per 1000 mammograms (95% CI 114-117) and was similar across ages and time since diagnosis. Second primary breast cancer was diagnosed after 7.1 per 1000 mammograms (95% CI 6.7-7.5) and was similar across ages but generally higher beginning 5 years post diagnosis. Positive predictive value among women with subsequent imaging ranged from 3.7 to 9.2%. Most second primary breast cancers were either in-situ (23.3%) or stage I (57.0%).\r\n\r\nCONCLUSIONS\r\nAlthough surveillance mammography may detect breast cancer even years after diagnosis, surveillance also leads to substantial subsequent testing. Whether continued surveillance at older ages improves health outcomes is uncertain.","PeriodicalId":501635,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the National Cancer Institute","volume":"14 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Diagnostic yield of surveillance mammography among older women.\",\"authors\":\"Ilana B Richman,Meghan E Lindsay,Jessica B Long,Eliza Epstein,Meera Sheffrin,Elizabeth R Berger\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/jnci/djaf270\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"BACKGROUND\\r\\nMammographic surveillance is common among older women with a history of breast cancer, but little is known about imaging outcomes in this population. The goal of this study was to describe short-term outcomes after surveillance mammography among older women, including use of subsequent imaging, cancer diagnosis, and positive predictive value.\\r\\n\\r\\nMETHODS\\r\\nThis was a longitudinal cohort study using SEER-Medicare data. We followed women diagnosed with breast cancer between 2003-2007 at age 67 or older until diagnosis of a second primary breast cancer, death, or end of follow up (2019). We used claims to identify surveillance mammograms. Outcomes included subsequent imaging, second primary breast cancer diagnosis, and positive predictive value after surveillance. Outcomes were identified based on proximity to surveillance mammography. We stratified analyses by age and time since diagnosis.\\r\\n\\r\\nRESULTS\\r\\nThe cohort included 33, 607 women who received 160,637 mammograms over a median 12.1 years. Subsequent imaging was performed after 115 per 1000 mammograms (95% CI 114-117) and was similar across ages and time since diagnosis. Second primary breast cancer was diagnosed after 7.1 per 1000 mammograms (95% CI 6.7-7.5) and was similar across ages but generally higher beginning 5 years post diagnosis. Positive predictive value among women with subsequent imaging ranged from 3.7 to 9.2%. Most second primary breast cancers were either in-situ (23.3%) or stage I (57.0%).\\r\\n\\r\\nCONCLUSIONS\\r\\nAlthough surveillance mammography may detect breast cancer even years after diagnosis, surveillance also leads to substantial subsequent testing. Whether continued surveillance at older ages improves health outcomes is uncertain.\",\"PeriodicalId\":501635,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the National Cancer Institute\",\"volume\":\"14 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the National Cancer Institute\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/jnci/djaf270\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the National Cancer Institute","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jnci/djaf270","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:乳房x线摄影监测在有乳腺癌病史的老年妇女中很常见,但对这一人群的影像学结果知之甚少。本研究的目的是描述老年妇女监测乳房x光检查后的短期结果,包括后续成像的使用、癌症诊断和阳性预测价值。方法采用SEER-Medicare数据进行纵向队列研究。我们跟踪了2003-2007年期间67岁或以上被诊断患有乳腺癌的女性,直到诊断出第二原发性乳腺癌、死亡或随访结束(2019年)。我们使用索赔来识别监视乳房x线照片。结果包括随后的影像学检查、第二原发性乳腺癌诊断和监测后的阳性预测值。结果是根据接近监测乳房x光检查确定的。我们按年龄和诊断后的时间进行分层分析。结果该队列包括33,607名妇女,她们在平均12.1年的时间里接受了160,637次乳房x光检查。每1000次乳房x光检查中有115次进行后续影像学检查(95% CI 114-117),并且自诊断以来年龄和时间相似。第二原发性乳腺癌的诊断是每1000个乳房x线照片中有7.1个(95% CI 6.7-7.5),不同年龄的乳腺癌诊断率相似,但通常在诊断后5年开始较高。在随后的影像学检查中,阳性预测值在3.7 - 9.2%之间。大多数第二原发性乳腺癌为原位(23.3%)或I期(57.0%)。结论:尽管乳房x光检查可以在诊断后数年发现乳腺癌,但监测也会导致大量的后续检查。老年人继续监测是否能改善健康结果尚不确定。
Diagnostic yield of surveillance mammography among older women.
BACKGROUND
Mammographic surveillance is common among older women with a history of breast cancer, but little is known about imaging outcomes in this population. The goal of this study was to describe short-term outcomes after surveillance mammography among older women, including use of subsequent imaging, cancer diagnosis, and positive predictive value.
METHODS
This was a longitudinal cohort study using SEER-Medicare data. We followed women diagnosed with breast cancer between 2003-2007 at age 67 or older until diagnosis of a second primary breast cancer, death, or end of follow up (2019). We used claims to identify surveillance mammograms. Outcomes included subsequent imaging, second primary breast cancer diagnosis, and positive predictive value after surveillance. Outcomes were identified based on proximity to surveillance mammography. We stratified analyses by age and time since diagnosis.
RESULTS
The cohort included 33, 607 women who received 160,637 mammograms over a median 12.1 years. Subsequent imaging was performed after 115 per 1000 mammograms (95% CI 114-117) and was similar across ages and time since diagnosis. Second primary breast cancer was diagnosed after 7.1 per 1000 mammograms (95% CI 6.7-7.5) and was similar across ages but generally higher beginning 5 years post diagnosis. Positive predictive value among women with subsequent imaging ranged from 3.7 to 9.2%. Most second primary breast cancers were either in-situ (23.3%) or stage I (57.0%).
CONCLUSIONS
Although surveillance mammography may detect breast cancer even years after diagnosis, surveillance also leads to substantial subsequent testing. Whether continued surveillance at older ages improves health outcomes is uncertain.