用于毒素检测和抗毒素评价的基于抗体的动物试验替代品。

IF 4.6 Q2 TOXICOLOGY
Frontiers in toxicology Pub Date : 2025-09-09 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.3389/ftox.2025.1636246
Seo-Hyuk Chang, Jieun Jang, Wonjun Yang, Nam-Kyung Lee, Seoyeon Choi, Hyo-Il Jung, Wantae Kim, Boksik Cha, Sung-Jin Yoon, Ji-Yoon Noh, Jangwook Lee
{"title":"用于毒素检测和抗毒素评价的基于抗体的动物试验替代品。","authors":"Seo-Hyuk Chang, Jieun Jang, Wonjun Yang, Nam-Kyung Lee, Seoyeon Choi, Hyo-Il Jung, Wantae Kim, Boksik Cha, Sung-Jin Yoon, Ji-Yoon Noh, Jangwook Lee","doi":"10.3389/ftox.2025.1636246","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Animal experiments have long played a central role in biomedical research and toxicology, yet their limitations in translational accuracy and ethical concerns have intensified the demand for reliable alternatives. Antibody-based technologies are versatile tools used to develop non-animal testing methods capable of detecting toxins and evaluating antitoxins. Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay and lateral flow assays, among other techniques, have demonstrated high specificity, sensitivity, and reproducibility and are useful in diagnostics, therapeutic development, and as platforms to replace traditional animal assays. Recent developments in <i>in vitro</i> systems, including organoids and microphysiological systems, as well as the integration of AI-based <i>in silico</i> models, offer promising directions. Standardization and regulatory acceptance remain key challenges. A coordinated approach can facilitate the development of antibody-based systems to fulfill the goal of the 3Rs.</p>","PeriodicalId":73111,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in toxicology","volume":"7 ","pages":"1636246"},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12454325/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Antibody-based alternatives to animal testing for toxin detection and antitoxin evaluation.\",\"authors\":\"Seo-Hyuk Chang, Jieun Jang, Wonjun Yang, Nam-Kyung Lee, Seoyeon Choi, Hyo-Il Jung, Wantae Kim, Boksik Cha, Sung-Jin Yoon, Ji-Yoon Noh, Jangwook Lee\",\"doi\":\"10.3389/ftox.2025.1636246\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Animal experiments have long played a central role in biomedical research and toxicology, yet their limitations in translational accuracy and ethical concerns have intensified the demand for reliable alternatives. Antibody-based technologies are versatile tools used to develop non-animal testing methods capable of detecting toxins and evaluating antitoxins. Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay and lateral flow assays, among other techniques, have demonstrated high specificity, sensitivity, and reproducibility and are useful in diagnostics, therapeutic development, and as platforms to replace traditional animal assays. Recent developments in <i>in vitro</i> systems, including organoids and microphysiological systems, as well as the integration of AI-based <i>in silico</i> models, offer promising directions. Standardization and regulatory acceptance remain key challenges. A coordinated approach can facilitate the development of antibody-based systems to fulfill the goal of the 3Rs.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73111,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Frontiers in toxicology\",\"volume\":\"7 \",\"pages\":\"1636246\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12454325/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Frontiers in toxicology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3389/ftox.2025.1636246\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"TOXICOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in toxicology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/ftox.2025.1636246","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"TOXICOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

动物实验长期以来在生物医学研究和毒理学中发挥着核心作用,但它们在转化准确性和伦理问题上的局限性加剧了对可靠替代品的需求。基于抗体的技术是用于开发能够检测毒素和评估抗毒素的非动物试验方法的通用工具。在其他技术中,酶联免疫吸附试验和侧流试验已证明具有高特异性、敏感性和可重复性,在诊断、治疗开发和替代传统动物试验方面非常有用。体外系统的最新发展,包括类器官和微生理系统,以及基于人工智能的硅模型的整合,提供了有希望的方向。标准化和监管接受仍然是主要的挑战。协调一致的方法可以促进基于抗体的系统的发展,以实现3r的目标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Antibody-based alternatives to animal testing for toxin detection and antitoxin evaluation.

Antibody-based alternatives to animal testing for toxin detection and antitoxin evaluation.

Antibody-based alternatives to animal testing for toxin detection and antitoxin evaluation.

Antibody-based alternatives to animal testing for toxin detection and antitoxin evaluation.

Animal experiments have long played a central role in biomedical research and toxicology, yet their limitations in translational accuracy and ethical concerns have intensified the demand for reliable alternatives. Antibody-based technologies are versatile tools used to develop non-animal testing methods capable of detecting toxins and evaluating antitoxins. Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay and lateral flow assays, among other techniques, have demonstrated high specificity, sensitivity, and reproducibility and are useful in diagnostics, therapeutic development, and as platforms to replace traditional animal assays. Recent developments in in vitro systems, including organoids and microphysiological systems, as well as the integration of AI-based in silico models, offer promising directions. Standardization and regulatory acceptance remain key challenges. A coordinated approach can facilitate the development of antibody-based systems to fulfill the goal of the 3Rs.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
13 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信