第一,不伤害:心理健康服务如何无意中增加年轻人的自杀率。

IF 2
Sarah Whitcombe-Dobbs
{"title":"第一,不伤害:心理健康服务如何无意中增加年轻人的自杀率。","authors":"Sarah Whitcombe-Dobbs","doi":"10.1177/13591045251383632","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Youth non-suicidal self-injury (NSSI) and suicidality have increased worldwide, yet funding is limited, and the workforce is stretched. This context of scarcity and risk influences service responses: thresholds for accessing services are raised, with increased gatekeeping. This commentary draws on behavioural and attachment theories to describe how reactive resource allocation can be harmful and inadvertently maintain distress. This occurs through unpredictably providing and then withdrawing access to mental health services. The mental health system itself can be seen as a participant in the therapeutic relationship, providing inconsistent and unpredictable responses to suicidal young people. Trauma- and attachment-related difficulties influence youth perceptions, and small interactions with services can maintain suicidality. When this pattern is recognised, it is possible to alter service responses to emulate interpersonal qualities that provide a sense of safety for those who seek help. For example, predictable responses, clear communication, validation throughout case progression, and consistent adherence to boundaries, all increase trust within the agency-client relationship.</p>","PeriodicalId":93938,"journal":{"name":"Clinical child psychology and psychiatry","volume":" ","pages":"13591045251383632"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"First, Do No Harm: How Mental Health Service Responses Can Inadvertently Increase Suicidality Among Young People.\",\"authors\":\"Sarah Whitcombe-Dobbs\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/13591045251383632\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Youth non-suicidal self-injury (NSSI) and suicidality have increased worldwide, yet funding is limited, and the workforce is stretched. This context of scarcity and risk influences service responses: thresholds for accessing services are raised, with increased gatekeeping. This commentary draws on behavioural and attachment theories to describe how reactive resource allocation can be harmful and inadvertently maintain distress. This occurs through unpredictably providing and then withdrawing access to mental health services. The mental health system itself can be seen as a participant in the therapeutic relationship, providing inconsistent and unpredictable responses to suicidal young people. Trauma- and attachment-related difficulties influence youth perceptions, and small interactions with services can maintain suicidality. When this pattern is recognised, it is possible to alter service responses to emulate interpersonal qualities that provide a sense of safety for those who seek help. For example, predictable responses, clear communication, validation throughout case progression, and consistent adherence to boundaries, all increase trust within the agency-client relationship.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":93938,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical child psychology and psychiatry\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"13591045251383632\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical child psychology and psychiatry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/13591045251383632\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical child psychology and psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/13591045251383632","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

青少年非自杀性自伤(NSSI)和自杀行为在世界范围内有所增加,但资金有限,劳动力紧张。这种稀缺性和风险的背景影响了服务响应:访问服务的门槛提高了,把关工作也增加了。这篇评论借鉴了行为和依恋理论来描述被动的资源分配是如何有害的,并在无意中维持了痛苦。这是通过不可预测地提供然后撤回精神卫生服务来实现的。精神卫生系统本身可以被视为治疗关系的参与者,对有自杀倾向的年轻人提供不一致和不可预测的反应。与创伤和依恋相关的困难会影响青少年的观念,与服务机构的微小互动可能会维持自杀倾向。当认识到这种模式时,就有可能改变服务反应,以模仿为寻求帮助的人提供安全感的人际品质。例如,可预测的回应、清晰的沟通、贯穿案件进展的验证以及对边界的一致遵守,都增加了代理-客户关系中的信任。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
First, Do No Harm: How Mental Health Service Responses Can Inadvertently Increase Suicidality Among Young People.

Youth non-suicidal self-injury (NSSI) and suicidality have increased worldwide, yet funding is limited, and the workforce is stretched. This context of scarcity and risk influences service responses: thresholds for accessing services are raised, with increased gatekeeping. This commentary draws on behavioural and attachment theories to describe how reactive resource allocation can be harmful and inadvertently maintain distress. This occurs through unpredictably providing and then withdrawing access to mental health services. The mental health system itself can be seen as a participant in the therapeutic relationship, providing inconsistent and unpredictable responses to suicidal young people. Trauma- and attachment-related difficulties influence youth perceptions, and small interactions with services can maintain suicidality. When this pattern is recognised, it is possible to alter service responses to emulate interpersonal qualities that provide a sense of safety for those who seek help. For example, predictable responses, clear communication, validation throughout case progression, and consistent adherence to boundaries, all increase trust within the agency-client relationship.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信