建筑体验中的脑动力学:前额叶和海马体区域跟踪美学和空间复杂性。

IF 3 3区 医学 Q2 NEUROSCIENCES
Lara Gregorians, Zita Patai, Pablo Fernandez Velasco, Fiona E Zisch, Hugo J Spiers
{"title":"建筑体验中的脑动力学:前额叶和海马体区域跟踪美学和空间复杂性。","authors":"Lara Gregorians, Zita Patai, Pablo Fernandez Velasco, Fiona E Zisch, Hugo J Spiers","doi":"10.1162/JOCN.a.104","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Architectural experience involves processing the spatial layout of an environment and our emotional reaction to it. However, these two processes are largely studied separately. Here, we used fMRI and first-person movies of journeys through buildings and cities to determine the contribution of different brain regions to spatial and aesthetic aspects of the built environment. During scanning, participants watched 48 movies that show first-person-view travel through different spaces; immediately after each video, they either judged the spatial layout complexity or valence of the environment. After scanning, participants took part in a debrief session that revealed how memorable each space encountered was. Activity in brain regions previously linked to valence processing (e.g., ventromedial pFC) was modulated by aesthetic qualities of the stimuli (i.e., increased for pleasant spaces compared to unpleasant spaces) and the task (more active when judging valence), whereas activity in brain regions linked with spatial processing (e.g., parahippocampal regions) increased in complex layouts compared to simple layouts. The hippocampus and parahippocampal cortex were associated with the memorability of spaces and were modulated by both aesthetic and spatial qualities. We also tested for curvature, fascination, coherence, and hominess-qualities linked to aesthetic judgement in architecture. We replicated findings activating right lingual gyrus for fascination, left inferior occipital gyrus for coherence, and left cuneus for hominess and found inverse computational curvature activated spatial, valence, and visual processing regions. Overall, these findings provide important insights into how different brain regions respond while experiencing new buildings and city spaces, which is needed to advance the field of neuroarchitecture.</p>","PeriodicalId":51081,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience","volume":" ","pages":"1-25"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Brain Dynamics during Architectural Experience: Prefrontal and Hippocampal Regions Track Aesthetics and Spatial Complexity.\",\"authors\":\"Lara Gregorians, Zita Patai, Pablo Fernandez Velasco, Fiona E Zisch, Hugo J Spiers\",\"doi\":\"10.1162/JOCN.a.104\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Architectural experience involves processing the spatial layout of an environment and our emotional reaction to it. However, these two processes are largely studied separately. Here, we used fMRI and first-person movies of journeys through buildings and cities to determine the contribution of different brain regions to spatial and aesthetic aspects of the built environment. During scanning, participants watched 48 movies that show first-person-view travel through different spaces; immediately after each video, they either judged the spatial layout complexity or valence of the environment. After scanning, participants took part in a debrief session that revealed how memorable each space encountered was. Activity in brain regions previously linked to valence processing (e.g., ventromedial pFC) was modulated by aesthetic qualities of the stimuli (i.e., increased for pleasant spaces compared to unpleasant spaces) and the task (more active when judging valence), whereas activity in brain regions linked with spatial processing (e.g., parahippocampal regions) increased in complex layouts compared to simple layouts. The hippocampus and parahippocampal cortex were associated with the memorability of spaces and were modulated by both aesthetic and spatial qualities. We also tested for curvature, fascination, coherence, and hominess-qualities linked to aesthetic judgement in architecture. We replicated findings activating right lingual gyrus for fascination, left inferior occipital gyrus for coherence, and left cuneus for hominess and found inverse computational curvature activated spatial, valence, and visual processing regions. Overall, these findings provide important insights into how different brain regions respond while experiencing new buildings and city spaces, which is needed to advance the field of neuroarchitecture.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51081,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-25\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1162/JOCN.a.104\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"NEUROSCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1162/JOCN.a.104","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

建筑体验包括处理环境的空间布局和我们对它的情感反应。然而,这两个过程在很大程度上是分开研究的。在这里,我们使用功能磁共振成像和穿越建筑物和城市的第一人称电影来确定不同的大脑区域对建筑环境的空间和美学方面的贡献。在扫描过程中,参与者观看了48部以第一人称视角穿越不同空间的电影;在每个视频之后,他们要么立即判断空间布局的复杂性,要么判断环境的价值。扫描后,参与者参加了一个汇报会议,以揭示每个空间遇到的难忘程度。先前与效价处理相关的大脑区域(例如,腹内侧pFC)的活动受到刺激的美学性质(即,愉悦空间比不愉快空间增加)和任务(在判断效价时更活跃)的调节,而与空间处理相关的大脑区域(例如,海马旁区)的活动在复杂布局中比在简单布局中增加。海马体和海马体旁皮层与空间记忆有关,并受到美学和空间质量的调节。我们还测试了曲率、魅力、连贯性和人性化——这些与建筑审美判断有关的品质。我们重复了激活右舌回负责魅力、左枕下回负责连贯性和左楔脑负责一致性的发现,并发现逆计算曲率激活了空间、价态和视觉加工区域。总的来说,这些发现为了解不同的大脑区域在体验新建筑和城市空间时的反应提供了重要的见解,这需要推进神经建筑领域。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Brain Dynamics during Architectural Experience: Prefrontal and Hippocampal Regions Track Aesthetics and Spatial Complexity.

Architectural experience involves processing the spatial layout of an environment and our emotional reaction to it. However, these two processes are largely studied separately. Here, we used fMRI and first-person movies of journeys through buildings and cities to determine the contribution of different brain regions to spatial and aesthetic aspects of the built environment. During scanning, participants watched 48 movies that show first-person-view travel through different spaces; immediately after each video, they either judged the spatial layout complexity or valence of the environment. After scanning, participants took part in a debrief session that revealed how memorable each space encountered was. Activity in brain regions previously linked to valence processing (e.g., ventromedial pFC) was modulated by aesthetic qualities of the stimuli (i.e., increased for pleasant spaces compared to unpleasant spaces) and the task (more active when judging valence), whereas activity in brain regions linked with spatial processing (e.g., parahippocampal regions) increased in complex layouts compared to simple layouts. The hippocampus and parahippocampal cortex were associated with the memorability of spaces and were modulated by both aesthetic and spatial qualities. We also tested for curvature, fascination, coherence, and hominess-qualities linked to aesthetic judgement in architecture. We replicated findings activating right lingual gyrus for fascination, left inferior occipital gyrus for coherence, and left cuneus for hominess and found inverse computational curvature activated spatial, valence, and visual processing regions. Overall, these findings provide important insights into how different brain regions respond while experiencing new buildings and city spaces, which is needed to advance the field of neuroarchitecture.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience
Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 医学-神经科学
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
3.10%
发文量
151
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience investigates brain–behavior interaction and promotes lively interchange among the mind sciences.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信