超低分割全乳房放射治疗早期乳腺癌的一种新型增强方案。

IF 3.5 3区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY
Molly A Chakraborty, Atif J Khan, Audree B Tadros, Charlie White, Zhigang Zhang, Minji Kim, Amy J Xu, Quincey LaPlant, Diana Roth O'Brien, John J Cuaron, Michael B Bernstein, Lior Z Braunstein, Simon N Powell, J Isabelle Choi
{"title":"超低分割全乳房放射治疗早期乳腺癌的一种新型增强方案。","authors":"Molly A Chakraborty, Atif J Khan, Audree B Tadros, Charlie White, Zhigang Zhang, Minji Kim, Amy J Xu, Quincey LaPlant, Diana Roth O'Brien, John J Cuaron, Michael B Bernstein, Lior Z Braunstein, Simon N Powell, J Isabelle Choi","doi":"10.1016/j.prro.2025.08.009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The 5-year results of the FAST-Forward trial demonstrate non-inferiority of local tumor control using a 26 Gy in 5 fraction regimen compared to 40 Gy in 15 fractions for breast cancer patients receiving adjuvant whole breast radiotherapy (WBRT) with or without a sequential conventionally-fractionated tumor bed boost (2Gy per fraction). Here, we report our institutional experience using the FAST-Forward regimen with a novel sequential boost regimen of 5.2 Gy in one fraction or 10.4 Gy in two fractions.</p><p><strong>Methods and materials: </strong>Patients with non-metastatic invasive breast cancer or ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) treated with adjuvant WBRT of 26 Gy in 5 fractions from 7/1/2019 to 6/1/2022 were identified from an institutional database. Clinical outcomes including adverse events, disease control, and patient-reported outcomes were collected. Survival outcomes were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Associations between toxicities and clinicopathologic and treatment characteristics were assessed using logistic regression.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 311 consecutive patients were included; the use of a 1 or 2 fraction boost was left to the discretion of the treating physicians (54% 1-fraction, 8.7% 2-fraction, 38% no boost). Median follow-up was 32 months. Overall survival and local recurrence-free survival probabilities at 36 months were 96% (95% CI: 94-99) and 93% (95% CI: 90-97), respectively. Acute and late toxicities occurred at a higher rate in the 2-fraction vs. 1-fraction and no boost groups (37.4%, 10.8%, and 12.2% (acute) and 22.7%, 8.6%, and 7.9% (late), respectively). Boost receipt, greater boost volume, 15X energy, increasing breast V95%, and bolus use were associated with risk of acute grade ≥2 toxicities.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>A 5-fraction ultra-hypofractionated WBRT regimen for early-stage breast cancer with either no boost or a single fraction boost of 5.2 Gy resulted in excellent disease control and acceptable toxicity. Increased toxicity was observed with a boost of 10.4 Gy in two fractions and is no longer used at our institution.</p>","PeriodicalId":54245,"journal":{"name":"Practical Radiation Oncology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Ultra-Hypofractionated Whole Breast Radiation Therapy Using a Novel Boost Regimen for Early-Stage Breast Cancer.\",\"authors\":\"Molly A Chakraborty, Atif J Khan, Audree B Tadros, Charlie White, Zhigang Zhang, Minji Kim, Amy J Xu, Quincey LaPlant, Diana Roth O'Brien, John J Cuaron, Michael B Bernstein, Lior Z Braunstein, Simon N Powell, J Isabelle Choi\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.prro.2025.08.009\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The 5-year results of the FAST-Forward trial demonstrate non-inferiority of local tumor control using a 26 Gy in 5 fraction regimen compared to 40 Gy in 15 fractions for breast cancer patients receiving adjuvant whole breast radiotherapy (WBRT) with or without a sequential conventionally-fractionated tumor bed boost (2Gy per fraction). Here, we report our institutional experience using the FAST-Forward regimen with a novel sequential boost regimen of 5.2 Gy in one fraction or 10.4 Gy in two fractions.</p><p><strong>Methods and materials: </strong>Patients with non-metastatic invasive breast cancer or ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) treated with adjuvant WBRT of 26 Gy in 5 fractions from 7/1/2019 to 6/1/2022 were identified from an institutional database. Clinical outcomes including adverse events, disease control, and patient-reported outcomes were collected. Survival outcomes were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Associations between toxicities and clinicopathologic and treatment characteristics were assessed using logistic regression.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 311 consecutive patients were included; the use of a 1 or 2 fraction boost was left to the discretion of the treating physicians (54% 1-fraction, 8.7% 2-fraction, 38% no boost). Median follow-up was 32 months. Overall survival and local recurrence-free survival probabilities at 36 months were 96% (95% CI: 94-99) and 93% (95% CI: 90-97), respectively. Acute and late toxicities occurred at a higher rate in the 2-fraction vs. 1-fraction and no boost groups (37.4%, 10.8%, and 12.2% (acute) and 22.7%, 8.6%, and 7.9% (late), respectively). Boost receipt, greater boost volume, 15X energy, increasing breast V95%, and bolus use were associated with risk of acute grade ≥2 toxicities.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>A 5-fraction ultra-hypofractionated WBRT regimen for early-stage breast cancer with either no boost or a single fraction boost of 5.2 Gy resulted in excellent disease control and acceptable toxicity. Increased toxicity was observed with a boost of 10.4 Gy in two fractions and is no longer used at our institution.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54245,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Practical Radiation Oncology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Practical Radiation Oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prro.2025.08.009\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Practical Radiation Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prro.2025.08.009","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:FAST-Forward试验的5年结果表明,对于接受辅助全乳房放疗(WBRT)的乳腺癌患者,采用5次26 Gy的治疗方案与15次40 Gy的治疗方案相比,局部肿瘤控制的效果无劣势性,无论是否采用顺序的常规分级肿瘤床增强(每次2Gy)。在这里,我们报告了我们使用FAST-Forward方案的机构经验,该方案采用了一种新的连续增强方案,即一个部分5.2 Gy或两个部分10.4 Gy。方法和材料:从机构数据库中筛选2019年7月1日至2022年6月1日期间接受26 Gy辅助WBRT治疗的非转移性浸润性乳腺癌或导管原位癌(DCIS)患者。收集临床结果,包括不良事件、疾病控制和患者报告的结果。使用Kaplan-Meier法估计生存结果。使用逻辑回归评估毒性与临床病理和治疗特征之间的关系。结果:共纳入311例连续患者;使用1或2个分数的提高是由治疗医生决定的(54% 1分数,8.7% 2分数,38%不提高)。中位随访时间为32个月。36个月的总生存率和局部无复发生存率分别为96% (95% CI: 94-99)和93% (95% CI: 90-97)。急性和晚期毒性的发生率在2组分组高于1组分组和无添加组(分别为37.4%、10.8%和12.2%(急性)和22.7%、8.6%和7.9%(晚期))。增强剂量、更大的增强剂量、15倍的能量、增加乳房V95%和大剂量使用与急性≥2级毒性风险相关。结论:5分次超低分次WBRT方案治疗早期乳腺癌,不增强或单分次5.2 Gy增强均可获得良好的疾病控制和可接受的毒性。我们观察到毒性的增加是在两部分增加10.4 Gy,我们的机构已经不再使用了。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Ultra-Hypofractionated Whole Breast Radiation Therapy Using a Novel Boost Regimen for Early-Stage Breast Cancer.

Purpose: The 5-year results of the FAST-Forward trial demonstrate non-inferiority of local tumor control using a 26 Gy in 5 fraction regimen compared to 40 Gy in 15 fractions for breast cancer patients receiving adjuvant whole breast radiotherapy (WBRT) with or without a sequential conventionally-fractionated tumor bed boost (2Gy per fraction). Here, we report our institutional experience using the FAST-Forward regimen with a novel sequential boost regimen of 5.2 Gy in one fraction or 10.4 Gy in two fractions.

Methods and materials: Patients with non-metastatic invasive breast cancer or ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) treated with adjuvant WBRT of 26 Gy in 5 fractions from 7/1/2019 to 6/1/2022 were identified from an institutional database. Clinical outcomes including adverse events, disease control, and patient-reported outcomes were collected. Survival outcomes were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Associations between toxicities and clinicopathologic and treatment characteristics were assessed using logistic regression.

Results: A total of 311 consecutive patients were included; the use of a 1 or 2 fraction boost was left to the discretion of the treating physicians (54% 1-fraction, 8.7% 2-fraction, 38% no boost). Median follow-up was 32 months. Overall survival and local recurrence-free survival probabilities at 36 months were 96% (95% CI: 94-99) and 93% (95% CI: 90-97), respectively. Acute and late toxicities occurred at a higher rate in the 2-fraction vs. 1-fraction and no boost groups (37.4%, 10.8%, and 12.2% (acute) and 22.7%, 8.6%, and 7.9% (late), respectively). Boost receipt, greater boost volume, 15X energy, increasing breast V95%, and bolus use were associated with risk of acute grade ≥2 toxicities.

Conclusion: A 5-fraction ultra-hypofractionated WBRT regimen for early-stage breast cancer with either no boost or a single fraction boost of 5.2 Gy resulted in excellent disease control and acceptable toxicity. Increased toxicity was observed with a boost of 10.4 Gy in two fractions and is no longer used at our institution.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Practical Radiation Oncology
Practical Radiation Oncology Medicine-Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
6.10%
发文量
177
审稿时长
34 days
期刊介绍: The overarching mission of Practical Radiation Oncology is to improve the quality of radiation oncology practice. PRO''s purpose is to document the state of current practice, providing background for those in training and continuing education for practitioners, through discussion and illustration of new techniques, evaluation of current practices, and publication of case reports. PRO strives to provide its readers content that emphasizes knowledge "with a purpose." The content of PRO includes: Original articles focusing on patient safety, quality measurement, or quality improvement initiatives Original articles focusing on imaging, contouring, target delineation, simulation, treatment planning, immobilization, organ motion, and other practical issues ASTRO guidelines, position papers, and consensus statements Essays that highlight enriching personal experiences in caring for cancer patients and their families.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信