中国西南地区肺部疾病患者术后声带功能障碍的知识、态度和实践:一项横断面研究

IF 2.4 4区 医学 Q1 AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY
Yuanyuan Peng, Qinghan Zeng, Yuhao Fu, Tianpei Ma, Jiaxin Li, Yuxin Wang, Xiaojun Tang, Dan Lu
{"title":"中国西南地区肺部疾病患者术后声带功能障碍的知识、态度和实践:一项横断面研究","authors":"Yuanyuan Peng, Qinghan Zeng, Yuhao Fu, Tianpei Ma, Jiaxin Li, Yuxin Wang, Xiaojun Tang, Dan Lu","doi":"10.1016/j.jvoice.2025.08.040","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study aims to investigate knowledge, attitudes, and practices regarding vocal dysfunction among patients with pulmonary diseases.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An electronic questionnaire consisting of 24 items in four sections was designed and distributed to patients with pulmonary diseases at the lung cancer center of West China Tian Fu Hospital from June 2024 to December 2024.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among the 253 patients, 154 (60.9%) had learned about the risk of postoperative vocal dysfunction before their hospitalization, 224 (88.5%) were informed of the risk of postoperative vocal dysfunction during their hospitalization, 130 (51.4%) believed that intraoperative iatrogenic injury to phonatory nerves was one of the causes of postoperative vocal dysfunction, and 75 (29.6%) were aware of the correlation between surgery location and vocal dysfunction. More than half of the participants (n = 144, 56.9%) acquired knowledge about postoperative vocal dysfunction during preoperative discussion with surgeons, and 219 (86.6%) participants were willing to receive relevant knowledge. While only a few participants had heard about videolaryngoscopy (n = 82, 32.4%), many participants held positive (n = 71, 28.1%) or neutral attitudes (n = 100, 39.5%) about laryngoscopy before pulmonary surgery. When asked whether they would seek medical help promptly if they experienced vocal dysfunction after pulmonary surgery, 216 (85.4%) participants chose \"Yes,\" and most of them would prefer conservative treatment rather than surgical treatment. The most frequently mentioned reason among 37 participants who would not seek medical help was \"Vocal dysfunction may gradually improve without medical intervention\" (n = 16, 6.3%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Patients with pulmonary diseases demonstrated limited awareness of postoperative vocal dysfunction despite receiving standard instructions during hospitalization. Implementing online patient education programs, preoperative risk counseling in outpatient settings, and multidisciplinary care pathways could improve the diagnosis and management of this complication.</p>","PeriodicalId":49954,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Voice","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practices Regarding Postoperative Vocal Dysfunction Among Patients With Pulmonary Diseases in Southwestern Mainland China: A Cross-Sectional Study.\",\"authors\":\"Yuanyuan Peng, Qinghan Zeng, Yuhao Fu, Tianpei Ma, Jiaxin Li, Yuxin Wang, Xiaojun Tang, Dan Lu\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jvoice.2025.08.040\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study aims to investigate knowledge, attitudes, and practices regarding vocal dysfunction among patients with pulmonary diseases.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An electronic questionnaire consisting of 24 items in four sections was designed and distributed to patients with pulmonary diseases at the lung cancer center of West China Tian Fu Hospital from June 2024 to December 2024.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among the 253 patients, 154 (60.9%) had learned about the risk of postoperative vocal dysfunction before their hospitalization, 224 (88.5%) were informed of the risk of postoperative vocal dysfunction during their hospitalization, 130 (51.4%) believed that intraoperative iatrogenic injury to phonatory nerves was one of the causes of postoperative vocal dysfunction, and 75 (29.6%) were aware of the correlation between surgery location and vocal dysfunction. More than half of the participants (n = 144, 56.9%) acquired knowledge about postoperative vocal dysfunction during preoperative discussion with surgeons, and 219 (86.6%) participants were willing to receive relevant knowledge. While only a few participants had heard about videolaryngoscopy (n = 82, 32.4%), many participants held positive (n = 71, 28.1%) or neutral attitudes (n = 100, 39.5%) about laryngoscopy before pulmonary surgery. When asked whether they would seek medical help promptly if they experienced vocal dysfunction after pulmonary surgery, 216 (85.4%) participants chose \\\"Yes,\\\" and most of them would prefer conservative treatment rather than surgical treatment. The most frequently mentioned reason among 37 participants who would not seek medical help was \\\"Vocal dysfunction may gradually improve without medical intervention\\\" (n = 16, 6.3%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Patients with pulmonary diseases demonstrated limited awareness of postoperative vocal dysfunction despite receiving standard instructions during hospitalization. Implementing online patient education programs, preoperative risk counseling in outpatient settings, and multidisciplinary care pathways could improve the diagnosis and management of this complication.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49954,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Voice\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Voice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2025.08.040\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Voice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2025.08.040","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究旨在探讨肺部疾病患者对声带功能障碍的认识、态度和做法。方法:设计4部分24项的电子问卷,于2024年6月至2024年12月在华西天府医院肺癌中心对肺部疾病患者进行问卷调查。结果:253例患者中,154例(60.9%)患者在入院前了解术后声带功能障碍的风险,224例(88.5%)患者在住院期间了解术后声带功能障碍的风险,130例(51.4%)患者认为术中医院源性发声神经损伤是术后声带功能障碍的原因之一,75例(29.6%)患者了解手术部位与声带功能障碍的相关性。超过一半的参与者(n = 144, 56.9%)在术前与外科医生的讨论中了解了术后声带功能障碍的知识,219名参与者(86.6%)愿意接受相关知识。虽然只有少数参与者听说过视频喉镜检查(n = 82, 32.4%),但许多参与者对肺部手术前喉镜检查持肯定态度(n = 71, 28.1%)或中立态度(n = 100, 39.5%)。当被问及如果肺部手术后出现声带功能障碍是否会及时寻求医疗帮助时,216名(85.4%)参与者选择了“是”,他们中的大多数人更喜欢保守治疗而不是手术治疗。在37名不愿寻求医疗帮助的参与者中,最常提到的原因是“声带功能障碍可以在没有医疗干预的情况下逐渐改善”(n = 16, 6.3%)。结论:肺部疾病患者尽管在住院期间接受了标准的指导,但对术后声带功能障碍的认识有限。实施在线患者教育计划、门诊术前风险咨询和多学科护理途径可以改善该并发症的诊断和管理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practices Regarding Postoperative Vocal Dysfunction Among Patients With Pulmonary Diseases in Southwestern Mainland China: A Cross-Sectional Study.

Objectives: This study aims to investigate knowledge, attitudes, and practices regarding vocal dysfunction among patients with pulmonary diseases.

Methods: An electronic questionnaire consisting of 24 items in four sections was designed and distributed to patients with pulmonary diseases at the lung cancer center of West China Tian Fu Hospital from June 2024 to December 2024.

Results: Among the 253 patients, 154 (60.9%) had learned about the risk of postoperative vocal dysfunction before their hospitalization, 224 (88.5%) were informed of the risk of postoperative vocal dysfunction during their hospitalization, 130 (51.4%) believed that intraoperative iatrogenic injury to phonatory nerves was one of the causes of postoperative vocal dysfunction, and 75 (29.6%) were aware of the correlation between surgery location and vocal dysfunction. More than half of the participants (n = 144, 56.9%) acquired knowledge about postoperative vocal dysfunction during preoperative discussion with surgeons, and 219 (86.6%) participants were willing to receive relevant knowledge. While only a few participants had heard about videolaryngoscopy (n = 82, 32.4%), many participants held positive (n = 71, 28.1%) or neutral attitudes (n = 100, 39.5%) about laryngoscopy before pulmonary surgery. When asked whether they would seek medical help promptly if they experienced vocal dysfunction after pulmonary surgery, 216 (85.4%) participants chose "Yes," and most of them would prefer conservative treatment rather than surgical treatment. The most frequently mentioned reason among 37 participants who would not seek medical help was "Vocal dysfunction may gradually improve without medical intervention" (n = 16, 6.3%).

Conclusions: Patients with pulmonary diseases demonstrated limited awareness of postoperative vocal dysfunction despite receiving standard instructions during hospitalization. Implementing online patient education programs, preoperative risk counseling in outpatient settings, and multidisciplinary care pathways could improve the diagnosis and management of this complication.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Voice
Journal of Voice 医学-耳鼻喉科学
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
13.60%
发文量
395
审稿时长
59 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Voice is widely regarded as the world''s premiere journal for voice medicine and research. This peer-reviewed publication is listed in Index Medicus and is indexed by the Institute for Scientific Information. The journal contains articles written by experts throughout the world on all topics in voice sciences, voice medicine and surgery, and speech-language pathologists'' management of voice-related problems. The journal includes clinical articles, clinical research, and laboratory research. Members of the Foundation receive the journal as a benefit of membership.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信