在健康成人多状态样本中检测压力介导反射光谱的设备内和设备间可靠性。

IF 3 3区 医学 Q2 NUTRITION & DIETETICS
Susan B Sisson, Emily Helms, Shanon Casperson, Saima Hasnin, Stephanie Jilcott Pitts, Virginia C Stage, Christopher R Long, Taren Massey-Swindle, Dipti A Dev, Ashlea Braun, Jodi D Stookey, Rowena Cape, Jonathan Baldwin
{"title":"在健康成人多状态样本中检测压力介导反射光谱的设备内和设备间可靠性。","authors":"Susan B Sisson, Emily Helms, Shanon Casperson, Saima Hasnin, Stephanie Jilcott Pitts, Virginia C Stage, Christopher R Long, Taren Massey-Swindle, Dipti A Dev, Ashlea Braun, Jodi D Stookey, Rowena Cape, Jonathan Baldwin","doi":"10.1017/S136898002510116X","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To examine the intra- and inter-device reliability of devices using pressure-mediated reflection spectroscopy (the Veggie Meter®).</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A cross-sectional research study was conducted across 8 sites in the United States. Using two Veggie Meters® at each site, participants completed five, counter-balanced pairs of finger scans. Intra-device comparisons included intra-class correlation coefficients (ICC) and calculation of the Coefficient of Variation (CV) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) of each device/site; hypothesized to be ≤ 6%. Inter-device comparisons included ICC, Absolute Relative Differences (ARD) and 95% CI, and equivalence; both hypothesized to be ≤ 10%.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Eight sites across the United States.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>Across sites, participants' (n=282) average age ranged 24.7-39.0 years; sex ranged 60.0%-85.7% women, and Non-Hispanic White ranged 20.0%-94.3%.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Intra-device ICC ranged from 0.77-0.99. The CV ranged from 6.2%-14.2%, with an average of 8.8%. A majority (63%; n=10) of the Veggie Meter® devices had significantly higher CV from the hypothesized 6%. Inter-device ICC ranged from 0.58-0.94. The Absolute Relative Difference (ARD) ranged from 7.5%-22.0%, with an average of 13.9%. ARD in a majority (n=5) of sites was significantly higher than the hypothesized 10%. Five sites (63%) demonstrated equivalence below the hypothesized 10%.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our study demonstrates the intra-device and inter-device reliability to be moderate to high, as per ICC. The observed margin of difference within a device was up to 14%, with an average of 9%. The observed margin of difference between devices was up to 22% with an average of 14% between devices.</p>","PeriodicalId":20951,"journal":{"name":"Public Health Nutrition","volume":" ","pages":"1-30"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Examining Intra- and Inter-Device Reliability of Pressure-Mediated Reflection Spectroscopy in a Multi-State Sample of Healthy Adults.\",\"authors\":\"Susan B Sisson, Emily Helms, Shanon Casperson, Saima Hasnin, Stephanie Jilcott Pitts, Virginia C Stage, Christopher R Long, Taren Massey-Swindle, Dipti A Dev, Ashlea Braun, Jodi D Stookey, Rowena Cape, Jonathan Baldwin\",\"doi\":\"10.1017/S136898002510116X\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To examine the intra- and inter-device reliability of devices using pressure-mediated reflection spectroscopy (the Veggie Meter®).</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A cross-sectional research study was conducted across 8 sites in the United States. Using two Veggie Meters® at each site, participants completed five, counter-balanced pairs of finger scans. Intra-device comparisons included intra-class correlation coefficients (ICC) and calculation of the Coefficient of Variation (CV) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) of each device/site; hypothesized to be ≤ 6%. Inter-device comparisons included ICC, Absolute Relative Differences (ARD) and 95% CI, and equivalence; both hypothesized to be ≤ 10%.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Eight sites across the United States.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>Across sites, participants' (n=282) average age ranged 24.7-39.0 years; sex ranged 60.0%-85.7% women, and Non-Hispanic White ranged 20.0%-94.3%.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Intra-device ICC ranged from 0.77-0.99. The CV ranged from 6.2%-14.2%, with an average of 8.8%. A majority (63%; n=10) of the Veggie Meter® devices had significantly higher CV from the hypothesized 6%. Inter-device ICC ranged from 0.58-0.94. The Absolute Relative Difference (ARD) ranged from 7.5%-22.0%, with an average of 13.9%. ARD in a majority (n=5) of sites was significantly higher than the hypothesized 10%. Five sites (63%) demonstrated equivalence below the hypothesized 10%.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our study demonstrates the intra-device and inter-device reliability to be moderate to high, as per ICC. The observed margin of difference within a device was up to 14%, with an average of 9%. The observed margin of difference between devices was up to 22% with an average of 14% between devices.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20951,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Public Health Nutrition\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-30\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Public Health Nutrition\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1017/S136898002510116X\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"NUTRITION & DIETETICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Public Health Nutrition","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S136898002510116X","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NUTRITION & DIETETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:利用压力介导反射光谱(Veggie Meter®)检测设备内部和设备之间的可靠性。设计:横断面研究在美国的8个地点进行。在每个站点使用两个Veggie Meters®,参与者完成了五对手指扫描。设备内比较包括类别内相关系数(ICC)和每个设备/站点的变异系数(CV)和95%置信区间(CI)的计算;假设为≤6%。设备间比较包括ICC、绝对相对差异(ARD)和95% CI和等效性;两者都假设为≤10%。地点:美国的八个地点。参与者:各站点参与者(n=282)的平均年龄为24.7-39.0岁;女性占60.0%-85.7%,非西班牙裔白人占20.0%-94.3%。结果:设备内ICC范围为0.77 ~ 0.99。CV范围为6.2%-14.2%,平均为8.8%。大多数(63%;n=10) Veggie Meter®设备的CV显著高于假设的6%。设备间ICC范围为0.58-0.94。绝对相对差(ARD)为7.5% ~ 22.0%,平均为13.9%。大多数(n=5)部位的ARD显著高于假设的10%。五个位点(63%)的等效性低于假设的10%。结论:我们的研究表明,根据ICC,设备内和设备间的可靠性为中等至高。在一个装置内观察到的差异幅度高达14%,平均为9%。观察到设备之间的差异幅度高达22%,设备之间的平均差异为14%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Examining Intra- and Inter-Device Reliability of Pressure-Mediated Reflection Spectroscopy in a Multi-State Sample of Healthy Adults.

Objective: To examine the intra- and inter-device reliability of devices using pressure-mediated reflection spectroscopy (the Veggie Meter®).

Design: A cross-sectional research study was conducted across 8 sites in the United States. Using two Veggie Meters® at each site, participants completed five, counter-balanced pairs of finger scans. Intra-device comparisons included intra-class correlation coefficients (ICC) and calculation of the Coefficient of Variation (CV) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) of each device/site; hypothesized to be ≤ 6%. Inter-device comparisons included ICC, Absolute Relative Differences (ARD) and 95% CI, and equivalence; both hypothesized to be ≤ 10%.

Setting: Eight sites across the United States.

Participants: Across sites, participants' (n=282) average age ranged 24.7-39.0 years; sex ranged 60.0%-85.7% women, and Non-Hispanic White ranged 20.0%-94.3%.

Results: Intra-device ICC ranged from 0.77-0.99. The CV ranged from 6.2%-14.2%, with an average of 8.8%. A majority (63%; n=10) of the Veggie Meter® devices had significantly higher CV from the hypothesized 6%. Inter-device ICC ranged from 0.58-0.94. The Absolute Relative Difference (ARD) ranged from 7.5%-22.0%, with an average of 13.9%. ARD in a majority (n=5) of sites was significantly higher than the hypothesized 10%. Five sites (63%) demonstrated equivalence below the hypothesized 10%.

Conclusions: Our study demonstrates the intra-device and inter-device reliability to be moderate to high, as per ICC. The observed margin of difference within a device was up to 14%, with an average of 9%. The observed margin of difference between devices was up to 22% with an average of 14% between devices.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Public Health Nutrition
Public Health Nutrition 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
6.20%
发文量
521
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Public Health Nutrition provides an international peer-reviewed forum for the publication and dissemination of research and scholarship aimed at understanding the causes of, and approaches and solutions to nutrition-related public health achievements, situations and problems around the world. The journal publishes original and commissioned articles, commentaries and discussion papers for debate. The journal is of interest to epidemiologists and health promotion specialists interested in the role of nutrition in disease prevention; academics and those involved in fieldwork and the application of research to identify practical solutions to important public health problems.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信