I M de Freitas, T S Carneiro, H Forville, M W Favoreto, M Wendlinger, R Ñaupari-Villasante, Sep Gonçalves, L Vallejo-Izquierdo, A D Loguercio
{"title":"办公室漂白凝胶混合后一周的疗效:一项随机临床试验。","authors":"I M de Freitas, T S Carneiro, H Forville, M W Favoreto, M Wendlinger, R Ñaupari-Villasante, Sep Gonçalves, L Vallejo-Izquierdo, A D Loguercio","doi":"10.2341/24-115-C","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This randomized clinical trial aimed to evaluate the efficacy, risk and intensity of tooth sensitivity (TS) and gingival irritation (GI), and esthetic self-perception of in-office dental bleaching using a bleaching gel 1 week after mixing.</p><p><strong>Methods and materials: </strong>Forty subjects underwent in-office bleaching with 40% hydrogen peroxide (Opalescence Boost PF, Ultradent). In a splitmouth design, each maxillary hemiarch received bleaching gel that was mixed during, or 1 week before, the treatment session. The bleaching procedure was performed in two sessions of 40 minutes with a 7-day interval. Tooth color was assessed before treatment, and 1 week, 2 weeks, and 1 month after the end of bleaching, using a digital spectrophotometer (Vita Easyshade; ΔEab, ΔE00, and ΔWID) and subjective scales (Vita Classical and Vita Bleachedguide; ΔSGU). The risk and intensity of TS and GI were recorded using a Visual Analogue Scale (0-10). Esthetic self-perception was assessed using the Orofacial Esthetic Scale (0-10).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Satisfactory bleaching was achieved in both groups, with no significant differences for objective (ΔEab, ΔE00, and ΔWID; p>0.72) or subjective (ΔSGU [shade guide units], p>0.84) color assessments. No significant differences were found in the risk and intensity of TS (p=0.79; p=0.67) or GI (p=1.0; p=0.85). Patients' esthetic self-perceptions changed after the procedure (p<0.009), mainly on the tooth color question (p<0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In-office dental bleaching with Opalescence Boost PF 40% remained effective, without differences in risk and intensity of TS and GI, even 1 week after mixing.</p>","PeriodicalId":19502,"journal":{"name":"Operative dentistry","volume":"50 4","pages":"358-368"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Efficacy of In-office Bleaching Gel One Week After Mixing: A Randomized Clinical Trial.\",\"authors\":\"I M de Freitas, T S Carneiro, H Forville, M W Favoreto, M Wendlinger, R Ñaupari-Villasante, Sep Gonçalves, L Vallejo-Izquierdo, A D Loguercio\",\"doi\":\"10.2341/24-115-C\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This randomized clinical trial aimed to evaluate the efficacy, risk and intensity of tooth sensitivity (TS) and gingival irritation (GI), and esthetic self-perception of in-office dental bleaching using a bleaching gel 1 week after mixing.</p><p><strong>Methods and materials: </strong>Forty subjects underwent in-office bleaching with 40% hydrogen peroxide (Opalescence Boost PF, Ultradent). In a splitmouth design, each maxillary hemiarch received bleaching gel that was mixed during, or 1 week before, the treatment session. The bleaching procedure was performed in two sessions of 40 minutes with a 7-day interval. Tooth color was assessed before treatment, and 1 week, 2 weeks, and 1 month after the end of bleaching, using a digital spectrophotometer (Vita Easyshade; ΔEab, ΔE00, and ΔWID) and subjective scales (Vita Classical and Vita Bleachedguide; ΔSGU). The risk and intensity of TS and GI were recorded using a Visual Analogue Scale (0-10). Esthetic self-perception was assessed using the Orofacial Esthetic Scale (0-10).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Satisfactory bleaching was achieved in both groups, with no significant differences for objective (ΔEab, ΔE00, and ΔWID; p>0.72) or subjective (ΔSGU [shade guide units], p>0.84) color assessments. No significant differences were found in the risk and intensity of TS (p=0.79; p=0.67) or GI (p=1.0; p=0.85). Patients' esthetic self-perceptions changed after the procedure (p<0.009), mainly on the tooth color question (p<0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In-office dental bleaching with Opalescence Boost PF 40% remained effective, without differences in risk and intensity of TS and GI, even 1 week after mixing.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19502,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Operative dentistry\",\"volume\":\"50 4\",\"pages\":\"358-368\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Operative dentistry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2341/24-115-C\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Operative dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2341/24-115-C","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
Efficacy of In-office Bleaching Gel One Week After Mixing: A Randomized Clinical Trial.
Objective: This randomized clinical trial aimed to evaluate the efficacy, risk and intensity of tooth sensitivity (TS) and gingival irritation (GI), and esthetic self-perception of in-office dental bleaching using a bleaching gel 1 week after mixing.
Methods and materials: Forty subjects underwent in-office bleaching with 40% hydrogen peroxide (Opalescence Boost PF, Ultradent). In a splitmouth design, each maxillary hemiarch received bleaching gel that was mixed during, or 1 week before, the treatment session. The bleaching procedure was performed in two sessions of 40 minutes with a 7-day interval. Tooth color was assessed before treatment, and 1 week, 2 weeks, and 1 month after the end of bleaching, using a digital spectrophotometer (Vita Easyshade; ΔEab, ΔE00, and ΔWID) and subjective scales (Vita Classical and Vita Bleachedguide; ΔSGU). The risk and intensity of TS and GI were recorded using a Visual Analogue Scale (0-10). Esthetic self-perception was assessed using the Orofacial Esthetic Scale (0-10).
Results: Satisfactory bleaching was achieved in both groups, with no significant differences for objective (ΔEab, ΔE00, and ΔWID; p>0.72) or subjective (ΔSGU [shade guide units], p>0.84) color assessments. No significant differences were found in the risk and intensity of TS (p=0.79; p=0.67) or GI (p=1.0; p=0.85). Patients' esthetic self-perceptions changed after the procedure (p<0.009), mainly on the tooth color question (p<0.001).
Conclusion: In-office dental bleaching with Opalescence Boost PF 40% remained effective, without differences in risk and intensity of TS and GI, even 1 week after mixing.
期刊介绍:
Operative Dentistry is a refereed, international journal published bi-monthly and distributed to subscribers in over 50 countries. In 2012, we printed 84 articles (672 pages). Papers were submitted by authors from 45 countries, in the categories of Clinical Research, Laboratory Research, Clinical Techniques/Case Presentations and Invited Papers, as well as Editorials and Abstracts.
One of the strong points of our journal is that our current publication time for accepted manuscripts is 4 to 6 months from the date of submission. Clinical Techniques/Case Presentations have a very quick turnaround time, which allows for very rapid publication of clinical based concepts. We also provide color for those papers that would benefit from its use.
The journal does not accept any advertising but you will find postings for faculty positions. Additionally, the journal also does not rent, sell or otherwise allow its subscriber list to be used by any other entity