在根管治疗、再治疗或在前牙区放置单牙种植体后,患者生活质量、满意度和先入为主的5年预后。

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q2 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Carlota de España, Juan Gonzalo Olivieri, Jordi Ortega, Sergio Morelló, Marc Encinas, Fernando Durán-Sindreu
{"title":"在根管治疗、再治疗或在前牙区放置单牙种植体后,患者生活质量、满意度和先入为主的5年预后。","authors":"Carlota de España, Juan Gonzalo Olivieri, Jordi Ortega, Sergio Morelló, Marc Encinas, Fernando Durán-Sindreu","doi":"10.1007/s10266-025-01199-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The primary aim of this study was to compare the overall satisfaction and quality of life (QoL) up to 5 years after treatment in patients who underwent root canal treatment (RCT), re-treatment (re-RCT), or single tooth implant (STI) placement in the anterior zone. The secondary aim was to analyze factors influencing decision-making and patients' fear levels. This cross-sectional study entailed face-to-face personal interviews performed 5 years after treatment. The procedures were performed in private practice by two experienced dentists, specialists in Endodontics and Oral Surgery and Implantology, respectively. The Chi-squared test was used to evaluate the differences in treatment decision-making. Factors influencing treatment decisions were compared using the Kruskal-Wallis test, while ANOVA was employed to assess Oral Health Impact Profile (OHIP)-14 scores and overall satisfaction. Significance was set at p < 0.05. Most patients reported that decisions were made jointly with their dentist, with no differences among groups (p > 0.05). Esthetics were the most influential factor in decision-making (p < 0.05). No differences were found in overall satisfaction among the groups (p > 0.05). STI treatment induced the highest perceived fear and pain scores (p < 0.05). Significant differences were found in some domains of the OHIP-14 in the STI group compared with the RCT and re-RCT groups (p < 0.05). No differences were found between the RCT and re-RCT groups (p > 0.05). Endodontic treatments (RCT and re-RCT) yielded high patient QoL and satisfaction levels comparable to STI, while resulting in lower social disability, psychological discomfort, and physical disability. Esthetics were the most influential determinant across all procedures. In addition, STI resulted in significantly higher perceived fear and pain levels compared with endodontic procedures. The present study's findings underscore the importance of personalized, patient-centered approaches in dental practice to enhance long-term patient satisfaction and outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":19390,"journal":{"name":"Odontology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Five-year outcomes of patient quality of life, satisfaction, and preconceptions following root canal treatment, re-treatment, or single dental implant placement in the anterior zone.\",\"authors\":\"Carlota de España, Juan Gonzalo Olivieri, Jordi Ortega, Sergio Morelló, Marc Encinas, Fernando Durán-Sindreu\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10266-025-01199-x\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The primary aim of this study was to compare the overall satisfaction and quality of life (QoL) up to 5 years after treatment in patients who underwent root canal treatment (RCT), re-treatment (re-RCT), or single tooth implant (STI) placement in the anterior zone. The secondary aim was to analyze factors influencing decision-making and patients' fear levels. This cross-sectional study entailed face-to-face personal interviews performed 5 years after treatment. The procedures were performed in private practice by two experienced dentists, specialists in Endodontics and Oral Surgery and Implantology, respectively. The Chi-squared test was used to evaluate the differences in treatment decision-making. Factors influencing treatment decisions were compared using the Kruskal-Wallis test, while ANOVA was employed to assess Oral Health Impact Profile (OHIP)-14 scores and overall satisfaction. Significance was set at p < 0.05. Most patients reported that decisions were made jointly with their dentist, with no differences among groups (p > 0.05). Esthetics were the most influential factor in decision-making (p < 0.05). No differences were found in overall satisfaction among the groups (p > 0.05). STI treatment induced the highest perceived fear and pain scores (p < 0.05). Significant differences were found in some domains of the OHIP-14 in the STI group compared with the RCT and re-RCT groups (p < 0.05). No differences were found between the RCT and re-RCT groups (p > 0.05). Endodontic treatments (RCT and re-RCT) yielded high patient QoL and satisfaction levels comparable to STI, while resulting in lower social disability, psychological discomfort, and physical disability. Esthetics were the most influential determinant across all procedures. In addition, STI resulted in significantly higher perceived fear and pain levels compared with endodontic procedures. The present study's findings underscore the importance of personalized, patient-centered approaches in dental practice to enhance long-term patient satisfaction and outcomes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19390,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Odontology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Odontology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10266-025-01199-x\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Odontology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10266-025-01199-x","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究的主要目的是比较接受根管治疗(RCT)、再治疗(re-RCT)或在前牙区放置单牙种植体(STI)的患者在治疗后5年的总体满意度和生活质量(QoL)。第二个目的是分析影响决策和患者恐惧程度的因素。这项横断面研究在治疗后5年进行了面对面的个人访谈。手术由两名经验丰富的牙医在私人诊所进行,他们分别是牙髓学、口腔外科和种植学的专家。采用卡方检验评价治疗决策的差异。采用Kruskal-Wallis检验比较影响治疗决策的因素,同时采用方差分析评估口腔健康影响概况(OHIP)-14评分和总体满意度。p < 0.05)。美学是影响决策的最主要因素(p < 0.05)。性传播感染治疗引起的感知恐惧和疼痛评分最高(p 0.05)。与STI相比,根管治疗(RCT和再RCT)获得了较高的患者生活质量和满意度,同时导致较低的社会残疾、心理不适和身体残疾。美学是所有手术中最具影响力的决定因素。此外,与牙髓治疗相比,STI导致明显更高的感知恐惧和疼痛水平。目前的研究结果强调了个性化,以患者为中心的方法在牙科实践中提高长期患者满意度和结果的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Five-year outcomes of patient quality of life, satisfaction, and preconceptions following root canal treatment, re-treatment, or single dental implant placement in the anterior zone.

The primary aim of this study was to compare the overall satisfaction and quality of life (QoL) up to 5 years after treatment in patients who underwent root canal treatment (RCT), re-treatment (re-RCT), or single tooth implant (STI) placement in the anterior zone. The secondary aim was to analyze factors influencing decision-making and patients' fear levels. This cross-sectional study entailed face-to-face personal interviews performed 5 years after treatment. The procedures were performed in private practice by two experienced dentists, specialists in Endodontics and Oral Surgery and Implantology, respectively. The Chi-squared test was used to evaluate the differences in treatment decision-making. Factors influencing treatment decisions were compared using the Kruskal-Wallis test, while ANOVA was employed to assess Oral Health Impact Profile (OHIP)-14 scores and overall satisfaction. Significance was set at p < 0.05. Most patients reported that decisions were made jointly with their dentist, with no differences among groups (p > 0.05). Esthetics were the most influential factor in decision-making (p < 0.05). No differences were found in overall satisfaction among the groups (p > 0.05). STI treatment induced the highest perceived fear and pain scores (p < 0.05). Significant differences were found in some domains of the OHIP-14 in the STI group compared with the RCT and re-RCT groups (p < 0.05). No differences were found between the RCT and re-RCT groups (p > 0.05). Endodontic treatments (RCT and re-RCT) yielded high patient QoL and satisfaction levels comparable to STI, while resulting in lower social disability, psychological discomfort, and physical disability. Esthetics were the most influential determinant across all procedures. In addition, STI resulted in significantly higher perceived fear and pain levels compared with endodontic procedures. The present study's findings underscore the importance of personalized, patient-centered approaches in dental practice to enhance long-term patient satisfaction and outcomes.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Odontology
Odontology 医学-牙科与口腔外科
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
4.00%
发文量
91
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal Odontology covers all disciplines involved in the fields of dentistry and craniofacial research, including molecular studies related to oral health and disease. Peer-reviewed articles cover topics ranging from research on human dental pulp, to comparisons of analgesics in surgery, to analysis of biofilm properties of dental plaque.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信