Sarah Martinelli, Emily M Melnick, Francesco Acciai, Ashley St Thomas, Punam Ohri-Vachaspati
{"title":"学校员工对美国普遍免费膳食的看法。","authors":"Sarah Martinelli, Emily M Melnick, Francesco Acciai, Ashley St Thomas, Punam Ohri-Vachaspati","doi":"10.1017/S1368980025101171","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>During the COVID-19 pandemic, the U.S. Department of Agriculture allowed all US schools to offer meals at no cost regardless of family income, a policy known as Universal Free Meals (UFM). Despite the recognized benefits of UFM, the policy expired in June 2022. The goal of this study was to gather perceptions of school staff in Arizona about school meals, UFM, and the discontinuation of UFM.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>This mixed-method study collected data using an online survey. Open-ended survey questions were analyzed using qualitative thematic analysis, and closed-ended questions were analyzed using descriptive analysis.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>The survey was distributed to school staff in the two major metropolitan areas in Arizona between September and October 2022, soon after the UFM policy expired.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>Survey responses were received from 1,255 school staff, including teachers, cafeteria staff, administrators, and other staff.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Most school staff (93%) were supportive of UFM, and the support was consistent across all staff categories and across different political leanings. Thematic analysis demonstrated that staff felt UFM helped to meet students basic needs, reduced stigma, and lessened the burden on teachers to use their own resources to provide food to students. Despite strong support, some staff reported concerns about food quality, program waste, and time available for lunch.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>UFM policies were strongly supported by school staff, despite some concerns about program implementation. Understanding these views is important to the discussion of expanding UFM policies in the US and globally.</p>","PeriodicalId":20951,"journal":{"name":"Public Health Nutrition","volume":" ","pages":"1-30"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"School Staff Perspectives on Universal Free Meals in the US.\",\"authors\":\"Sarah Martinelli, Emily M Melnick, Francesco Acciai, Ashley St Thomas, Punam Ohri-Vachaspati\",\"doi\":\"10.1017/S1368980025101171\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>During the COVID-19 pandemic, the U.S. Department of Agriculture allowed all US schools to offer meals at no cost regardless of family income, a policy known as Universal Free Meals (UFM). Despite the recognized benefits of UFM, the policy expired in June 2022. The goal of this study was to gather perceptions of school staff in Arizona about school meals, UFM, and the discontinuation of UFM.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>This mixed-method study collected data using an online survey. Open-ended survey questions were analyzed using qualitative thematic analysis, and closed-ended questions were analyzed using descriptive analysis.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>The survey was distributed to school staff in the two major metropolitan areas in Arizona between September and October 2022, soon after the UFM policy expired.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>Survey responses were received from 1,255 school staff, including teachers, cafeteria staff, administrators, and other staff.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Most school staff (93%) were supportive of UFM, and the support was consistent across all staff categories and across different political leanings. Thematic analysis demonstrated that staff felt UFM helped to meet students basic needs, reduced stigma, and lessened the burden on teachers to use their own resources to provide food to students. Despite strong support, some staff reported concerns about food quality, program waste, and time available for lunch.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>UFM policies were strongly supported by school staff, despite some concerns about program implementation. Understanding these views is important to the discussion of expanding UFM policies in the US and globally.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20951,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Public Health Nutrition\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-30\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Public Health Nutrition\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1017/S1368980025101171\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"NUTRITION & DIETETICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Public Health Nutrition","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S1368980025101171","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NUTRITION & DIETETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
School Staff Perspectives on Universal Free Meals in the US.
Objective: During the COVID-19 pandemic, the U.S. Department of Agriculture allowed all US schools to offer meals at no cost regardless of family income, a policy known as Universal Free Meals (UFM). Despite the recognized benefits of UFM, the policy expired in June 2022. The goal of this study was to gather perceptions of school staff in Arizona about school meals, UFM, and the discontinuation of UFM.
Design: This mixed-method study collected data using an online survey. Open-ended survey questions were analyzed using qualitative thematic analysis, and closed-ended questions were analyzed using descriptive analysis.
Setting: The survey was distributed to school staff in the two major metropolitan areas in Arizona between September and October 2022, soon after the UFM policy expired.
Participants: Survey responses were received from 1,255 school staff, including teachers, cafeteria staff, administrators, and other staff.
Results: Most school staff (93%) were supportive of UFM, and the support was consistent across all staff categories and across different political leanings. Thematic analysis demonstrated that staff felt UFM helped to meet students basic needs, reduced stigma, and lessened the burden on teachers to use their own resources to provide food to students. Despite strong support, some staff reported concerns about food quality, program waste, and time available for lunch.
Conclusions: UFM policies were strongly supported by school staff, despite some concerns about program implementation. Understanding these views is important to the discussion of expanding UFM policies in the US and globally.
期刊介绍：
Public Health Nutrition provides an international peer-reviewed forum for the publication and dissemination of research and scholarship aimed at understanding the causes of, and approaches and solutions to nutrition-related public health achievements, situations and problems around the world. The journal publishes original and commissioned articles, commentaries and discussion papers for debate. The journal is of interest to epidemiologists and health promotion specialists interested in the role of nutrition in disease prevention; academics and those involved in fieldwork and the application of research to identify practical solutions to important public health problems.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
