估计华盛顿州和俄勒冈州COVID-19疫苗接种的人群免疫力和影响。

IF 3.8 4区 医学 Q2 IMMUNOLOGY
Open Forum Infectious Diseases Pub Date : 2025-08-30 eCollection Date: 2025-09-01 DOI:10.1093/ofid/ofaf531
Mia Moore, Larissa Anderson, Chloe Bracis, David A Swan, Ian Painter, Erik Everson, Holly Janes, Joshua T Schiffer, Laura Matrajt, Dobromir Dimitrov
{"title":"估计华盛顿州和俄勒冈州COVID-19疫苗接种的人群免疫力和影响。","authors":"Mia Moore, Larissa Anderson, Chloe Bracis, David A Swan, Ian Painter, Erik Everson, Holly Janes, Joshua T Schiffer, Laura Matrajt, Dobromir Dimitrov","doi":"10.1093/ofid/ofaf531","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) mRNA vaccine showed high clinical efficacy against the ancestral variant, but immunological waning, emergence of new variants, and the durability of infection-induced immunity complicate the estimation of population-level effectiveness. We used mathematical modeling to calculate the proportion of hospitalizations averted by vaccination in Washington and Oregon.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We used an age- and region-structured compartmental model of vaccine-induced and infection-induced immunity from January 2020 until December 2022. We parameterized the strength and durability of immunity via a meta-regression of vaccine efficacy. We calibrated a time-varying contact matrix to weekly hospitalizations reported by the Washington Department of Health and Oregon Health Authority. We validated our model with Centers for Disease Control and Prevention serosurveillance data. To estimate vaccine effectiveness, we created counterfactual scenarios with no vaccination either in the entire population or in select age groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We found that total hospitalizations were reduced 74% (95% credible interval [CrI], 69%-78%) and 15% (95% CrI, 9%-19%) by primary vaccination and boosters, respectively. Vaccination effectiveness was highest during the Alpha wave, averting 90% (95% CrI, 88%-93%) of hospitalizations and in people aged 65+, averting 78% (95% CrI, 73%-81%). Relative to only vaccinating individuals aged 50+, vaccination of individuals aged 18-49 averted 52% (95% CrI, 44%-58%) of hospitalizations overall and 42% (95% CrI, 35%-48%) of hospitalizations among individuals 65+.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The SARS-CoV-2 vaccination program in Washington and Oregon averted the majority of hospitalizations. Vaccinating individuals aged 18-49 significantly reduced hospitalization among individuals aged 65+.</p>","PeriodicalId":19517,"journal":{"name":"Open Forum Infectious Diseases","volume":"12 9","pages":"ofaf531"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12456170/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Estimating Population Immunity and Impact of COVID-19 Vaccination in Washington State and Oregon.\",\"authors\":\"Mia Moore, Larissa Anderson, Chloe Bracis, David A Swan, Ian Painter, Erik Everson, Holly Janes, Joshua T Schiffer, Laura Matrajt, Dobromir Dimitrov\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/ofid/ofaf531\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) mRNA vaccine showed high clinical efficacy against the ancestral variant, but immunological waning, emergence of new variants, and the durability of infection-induced immunity complicate the estimation of population-level effectiveness. We used mathematical modeling to calculate the proportion of hospitalizations averted by vaccination in Washington and Oregon.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We used an age- and region-structured compartmental model of vaccine-induced and infection-induced immunity from January 2020 until December 2022. We parameterized the strength and durability of immunity via a meta-regression of vaccine efficacy. We calibrated a time-varying contact matrix to weekly hospitalizations reported by the Washington Department of Health and Oregon Health Authority. We validated our model with Centers for Disease Control and Prevention serosurveillance data. To estimate vaccine effectiveness, we created counterfactual scenarios with no vaccination either in the entire population or in select age groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We found that total hospitalizations were reduced 74% (95% credible interval [CrI], 69%-78%) and 15% (95% CrI, 9%-19%) by primary vaccination and boosters, respectively. Vaccination effectiveness was highest during the Alpha wave, averting 90% (95% CrI, 88%-93%) of hospitalizations and in people aged 65+, averting 78% (95% CrI, 73%-81%). Relative to only vaccinating individuals aged 50+, vaccination of individuals aged 18-49 averted 52% (95% CrI, 44%-58%) of hospitalizations overall and 42% (95% CrI, 35%-48%) of hospitalizations among individuals 65+.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The SARS-CoV-2 vaccination program in Washington and Oregon averted the majority of hospitalizations. Vaccinating individuals aged 18-49 significantly reduced hospitalization among individuals aged 65+.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19517,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Open Forum Infectious Diseases\",\"volume\":\"12 9\",\"pages\":\"ofaf531\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12456170/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Open Forum Infectious Diseases\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofaf531\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/9/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"IMMUNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Open Forum Infectious Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofaf531","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/9/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2 (SARS-CoV-2) mRNA疫苗对祖先变异具有较高的临床疗效,但免疫功能减弱、新变异的出现以及感染诱导免疫的持久性使人群水平有效性的估计复杂化。我们使用数学模型来计算华盛顿州和俄勒冈州接种疫苗避免住院的比例。方法:从2020年1月到2022年12月,我们使用了一个年龄和区域结构的疫苗诱导和感染诱导免疫的室室模型。我们通过疫苗效力的元回归将免疫的强度和持久性参数化。我们根据华盛顿卫生部和俄勒冈州卫生局报告的每周住院情况校准了时变接触矩阵。我们用疾病控制和预防中心的血清监测数据验证了我们的模型。为了估计疫苗的有效性,我们在整个人群或特定年龄组中创建了不接种疫苗的反事实情景。结果:我们发现,通过初次接种和加强接种,总住院率分别降低了74%(95%可信区间[CrI], 69%-78%)和15%(95%可信区间[CrI], 9%-19%)。在Alpha波期间,疫苗接种的有效性最高,避免了90% (95% CrI, 88%-93%)的住院率,65岁以上人群避免了78% (95% CrI, 73%-81%)的住院率。与仅接种50岁以上人群相比,18-49岁人群接种疫苗可避免52% (95% CrI, 44%-58%)的总体住院率和42% (95% CrI, 35%-48%)的65岁以上人群住院率。结论:华盛顿州和俄勒冈州的SARS-CoV-2疫苗接种计划避免了大多数住院治疗。接种疫苗的18-49岁个体显著降低了65岁以上个体的住院率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Estimating Population Immunity and Impact of COVID-19 Vaccination in Washington State and Oregon.

Background: The severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) mRNA vaccine showed high clinical efficacy against the ancestral variant, but immunological waning, emergence of new variants, and the durability of infection-induced immunity complicate the estimation of population-level effectiveness. We used mathematical modeling to calculate the proportion of hospitalizations averted by vaccination in Washington and Oregon.

Methods: We used an age- and region-structured compartmental model of vaccine-induced and infection-induced immunity from January 2020 until December 2022. We parameterized the strength and durability of immunity via a meta-regression of vaccine efficacy. We calibrated a time-varying contact matrix to weekly hospitalizations reported by the Washington Department of Health and Oregon Health Authority. We validated our model with Centers for Disease Control and Prevention serosurveillance data. To estimate vaccine effectiveness, we created counterfactual scenarios with no vaccination either in the entire population or in select age groups.

Results: We found that total hospitalizations were reduced 74% (95% credible interval [CrI], 69%-78%) and 15% (95% CrI, 9%-19%) by primary vaccination and boosters, respectively. Vaccination effectiveness was highest during the Alpha wave, averting 90% (95% CrI, 88%-93%) of hospitalizations and in people aged 65+, averting 78% (95% CrI, 73%-81%). Relative to only vaccinating individuals aged 50+, vaccination of individuals aged 18-49 averted 52% (95% CrI, 44%-58%) of hospitalizations overall and 42% (95% CrI, 35%-48%) of hospitalizations among individuals 65+.

Conclusions: The SARS-CoV-2 vaccination program in Washington and Oregon averted the majority of hospitalizations. Vaccinating individuals aged 18-49 significantly reduced hospitalization among individuals aged 65+.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Open Forum Infectious Diseases
Open Forum Infectious Diseases Medicine-Neurology (clinical)
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
4.80%
发文量
630
审稿时长
9 weeks
期刊介绍: Open Forum Infectious Diseases provides a global forum for the publication of clinical, translational, and basic research findings in a fully open access, online journal environment. The journal reflects the broad diversity of the field of infectious diseases, and focuses on the intersection of biomedical science and clinical practice, with a particular emphasis on knowledge that holds the potential to improve patient care in populations around the world. Fully peer-reviewed, OFID supports the international community of infectious diseases experts by providing a venue for articles that further the understanding of all aspects of infectious diseases.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信