限制生殖权利和LGBT权利的州立法与传染病奖学金匹配率协会。

IF 3.8 4区 医学 Q2 IMMUNOLOGY
Open Forum Infectious Diseases Pub Date : 2025-09-23 eCollection Date: 2025-09-01 DOI:10.1093/ofid/ofaf534
Michael Z Chen, Aniruddha Hazra, Alan L Hutchison, Anna E Czapar
{"title":"限制生殖权利和LGBT权利的州立法与传染病奖学金匹配率协会。","authors":"Michael Z Chen, Aniruddha Hazra, Alan L Hutchison, Anna E Czapar","doi":"10.1093/ofid/ofaf534","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Infectious diseases (ID) fellowship match rates have declined over the last decade. Previous studies have identified factors that influence interest in ID and fellowship match rates, but the association of state legislation restricting reproductive and/or lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender (LGBT) rights with ID fellowship match rates is unknown.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>All adult ID fellowship programs in the United States from 2017 to 2025 were categorized as located in states, districts, or territories with or without restrictions on reproductive and/or lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender rights. Programs were also categorized by academic status as academic, university-affiliated community, or pure community programs. Match rates were compared between programs when stratifying by state restrictions, academic status, and both status using χ<sup>2</sup> tests.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In 6 of the 9 years studied, match rates of adult ID fellowship programs were higher to a significant degree for academic programs in permissive states than for those in restrictive states (2017-2018, 2021-2023, 2025; <i>P</i> = .002 to <i>P</i> = .02). In the same period, there were no differences in match rates between university-affiliated community programs or pure community programs in states with and without restrictions.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The presence of legislation restricting reproductive and/or LGBT rights was associated with significantly reduced match rates in academic programs but not in university-affiliated community programs or pure community programs. Academic fellowship programs represent the majority of ID fellowship programs and must make note of this when recruiting fellows.</p>","PeriodicalId":19517,"journal":{"name":"Open Forum Infectious Diseases","volume":"12 9","pages":"ofaf534"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12454930/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Association of State Legislation Restricting Reproductive and LGBT Rights With Infectious Diseases Fellowship Match Rates.\",\"authors\":\"Michael Z Chen, Aniruddha Hazra, Alan L Hutchison, Anna E Czapar\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/ofid/ofaf534\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Infectious diseases (ID) fellowship match rates have declined over the last decade. Previous studies have identified factors that influence interest in ID and fellowship match rates, but the association of state legislation restricting reproductive and/or lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender (LGBT) rights with ID fellowship match rates is unknown.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>All adult ID fellowship programs in the United States from 2017 to 2025 were categorized as located in states, districts, or territories with or without restrictions on reproductive and/or lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender rights. Programs were also categorized by academic status as academic, university-affiliated community, or pure community programs. Match rates were compared between programs when stratifying by state restrictions, academic status, and both status using χ<sup>2</sup> tests.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In 6 of the 9 years studied, match rates of adult ID fellowship programs were higher to a significant degree for academic programs in permissive states than for those in restrictive states (2017-2018, 2021-2023, 2025; <i>P</i> = .002 to <i>P</i> = .02). In the same period, there were no differences in match rates between university-affiliated community programs or pure community programs in states with and without restrictions.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The presence of legislation restricting reproductive and/or LGBT rights was associated with significantly reduced match rates in academic programs but not in university-affiliated community programs or pure community programs. Academic fellowship programs represent the majority of ID fellowship programs and must make note of this when recruiting fellows.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19517,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Open Forum Infectious Diseases\",\"volume\":\"12 9\",\"pages\":\"ofaf534\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12454930/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Open Forum Infectious Diseases\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofaf534\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/9/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"IMMUNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Open Forum Infectious Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofaf534","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/9/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:传染病(ID)奖学金匹配率在过去十年中有所下降。先前的研究已经确定了影响ID和奖学金匹配率的因素,但限制生殖和/或女同性恋、男同性恋、双性恋和变性人(LGBT)权利的州立法与ID奖学金匹配率的关系尚不清楚。方法:从2017年到2025年,美国所有的成人身份研究项目都被归类为位于有或没有生殖和/或女同性恋、男同性恋、双性恋和变性权利限制的州、地区或领土。项目也根据学术地位被分类为学术项目、大学附属社区项目或纯社区项目。在按州限制、学术地位和两种地位分层时,使用χ2检验比较方案之间的匹配率。结果:在9年的研究中,有6年,宽松州的学术项目对成人身份奖学金项目的匹配率显著高于限制州(2017-2018年、2021-2023年、2025年;P = 0.002至P = 0.02)。在同一时期,在有限制和没有限制的州,大学附属社区项目和纯社区项目的匹配率没有差异。结论:限制生殖和/或LGBT权利的立法存在与学术项目的匹配率显著降低有关,而与大学附属社区项目或纯社区项目无关。学术奖学金项目占ID奖学金项目的大部分,在招募研究员时必须注意这一点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Association of State Legislation Restricting Reproductive and LGBT Rights With Infectious Diseases Fellowship Match Rates.

Background: Infectious diseases (ID) fellowship match rates have declined over the last decade. Previous studies have identified factors that influence interest in ID and fellowship match rates, but the association of state legislation restricting reproductive and/or lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender (LGBT) rights with ID fellowship match rates is unknown.

Methods: All adult ID fellowship programs in the United States from 2017 to 2025 were categorized as located in states, districts, or territories with or without restrictions on reproductive and/or lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender rights. Programs were also categorized by academic status as academic, university-affiliated community, or pure community programs. Match rates were compared between programs when stratifying by state restrictions, academic status, and both status using χ2 tests.

Results: In 6 of the 9 years studied, match rates of adult ID fellowship programs were higher to a significant degree for academic programs in permissive states than for those in restrictive states (2017-2018, 2021-2023, 2025; P = .002 to P = .02). In the same period, there were no differences in match rates between university-affiliated community programs or pure community programs in states with and without restrictions.

Conclusions: The presence of legislation restricting reproductive and/or LGBT rights was associated with significantly reduced match rates in academic programs but not in university-affiliated community programs or pure community programs. Academic fellowship programs represent the majority of ID fellowship programs and must make note of this when recruiting fellows.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Open Forum Infectious Diseases
Open Forum Infectious Diseases Medicine-Neurology (clinical)
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
4.80%
发文量
630
审稿时长
9 weeks
期刊介绍: Open Forum Infectious Diseases provides a global forum for the publication of clinical, translational, and basic research findings in a fully open access, online journal environment. The journal reflects the broad diversity of the field of infectious diseases, and focuses on the intersection of biomedical science and clinical practice, with a particular emphasis on knowledge that holds the potential to improve patient care in populations around the world. Fully peer-reviewed, OFID supports the international community of infectious diseases experts by providing a venue for articles that further the understanding of all aspects of infectious diseases.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信