循环脂质代谢物在乳腺癌风险中的作用的新因果证据:双向孟德尔随机化分析。

IF 2.4 Q3 NUTRITION & DIETETICS
Journal of Nutrition and Metabolism Pub Date : 2025-09-16 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1155/jnme/2292774
Cheng Zeng, Shuning Liu, Yuhan Wei, Yalong Qi, Yujing Tan, Haili Qian, Jiani Wang, Fei Ma
{"title":"循环脂质代谢物在乳腺癌风险中的作用的新因果证据:双向孟德尔随机化分析。","authors":"Cheng Zeng, Shuning Liu, Yuhan Wei, Yalong Qi, Yujing Tan, Haili Qian, Jiani Wang, Fei Ma","doi":"10.1155/jnme/2292774","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Dysregulated lipid metabolism has been implicated in breast cancer pathogenesis; however, the causal nature of these associations remains unclear. This study aimed to investigate the causal relationships between circulating lipid metabolites and the risk of estrogen receptor-positive (ER+) and ER-negative (ER-) breast cancer using a bidirectional Mendelian randomization (MR) approach. <b>Methods:</b> We evaluated 386 circulating lipid metabolites as exposures in two-sample MR analyses, with ER+ and ER- breast cancer as outcomes. Genetic instruments were selected based on genome-wide significance (<i>p</i> < 1 × 10<sup>-5</sup>) and linkage disequilibrium clumping (<i>R</i> <sup>2</sup> < 0.01 within a 1000 kb window). The inverse variance weighted method was used as the primary analytical approach. Sensitivity analyses-including MR-Egger regression, Cochran's <i>Q</i> test, and leave-one-out analyses-were conducted to assess pleiotropy and heterogeneity. Validation analyses were performed using an independent genome-wide association study (GWAS) dataset for ER+ breast cancer. Reverse MR analysis was also conducted to evaluate potential reverse causality. <b>Results:</b> Among the 386 lipid metabolites analyzed, 24 and 23 exhibited nominal associations (<i>p</i> < 0.05) with ER+ and ER- breast cancer, respectively. After applying false discovery rate (FDR) correction (FDR < 0.05), three metabolites-myristoleate (14:1n5), tricosanoyl sphingomyelin (d18:1/23:0), and 5α-androstan-3β, 17β-diol monosulfate (2)-remained significantly associated with an increased risk of ER+ breast cancer. In contrast, none of the associations with ER- breast cancer remained significant after FDR correction. Sensitivity analyses indicated no evidence of horizontal pleiotropy or heterogeneity, and the associations remained robust in leave-one-out analyses. These findings were further validated in an independent GWAS dataset. Moreover, reverse MR analysis found no evidence supporting a causal effect of ER+ breast cancer on the levels of the three identified lipid metabolites. <b>Conclusions:</b> This study provides robust genetic evidence supporting a causal role for specific lipid metabolites in the development of ER+ breast cancer. These metabolites may serve as potential biomarkers for early detection and targets for preventive interventions.</p>","PeriodicalId":16587,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Nutrition and Metabolism","volume":"2025 ","pages":"2292774"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12457059/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Novel Causal Evidence for the Role of Circulating Lipid Metabolites in Breast Cancer Risk: A Bidirectional Mendelian Randomization Analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Cheng Zeng, Shuning Liu, Yuhan Wei, Yalong Qi, Yujing Tan, Haili Qian, Jiani Wang, Fei Ma\",\"doi\":\"10.1155/jnme/2292774\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Dysregulated lipid metabolism has been implicated in breast cancer pathogenesis; however, the causal nature of these associations remains unclear. This study aimed to investigate the causal relationships between circulating lipid metabolites and the risk of estrogen receptor-positive (ER+) and ER-negative (ER-) breast cancer using a bidirectional Mendelian randomization (MR) approach. <b>Methods:</b> We evaluated 386 circulating lipid metabolites as exposures in two-sample MR analyses, with ER+ and ER- breast cancer as outcomes. Genetic instruments were selected based on genome-wide significance (<i>p</i> < 1 × 10<sup>-5</sup>) and linkage disequilibrium clumping (<i>R</i> <sup>2</sup> < 0.01 within a 1000 kb window). The inverse variance weighted method was used as the primary analytical approach. Sensitivity analyses-including MR-Egger regression, Cochran's <i>Q</i> test, and leave-one-out analyses-were conducted to assess pleiotropy and heterogeneity. Validation analyses were performed using an independent genome-wide association study (GWAS) dataset for ER+ breast cancer. Reverse MR analysis was also conducted to evaluate potential reverse causality. <b>Results:</b> Among the 386 lipid metabolites analyzed, 24 and 23 exhibited nominal associations (<i>p</i> < 0.05) with ER+ and ER- breast cancer, respectively. After applying false discovery rate (FDR) correction (FDR < 0.05), three metabolites-myristoleate (14:1n5), tricosanoyl sphingomyelin (d18:1/23:0), and 5α-androstan-3β, 17β-diol monosulfate (2)-remained significantly associated with an increased risk of ER+ breast cancer. In contrast, none of the associations with ER- breast cancer remained significant after FDR correction. Sensitivity analyses indicated no evidence of horizontal pleiotropy or heterogeneity, and the associations remained robust in leave-one-out analyses. These findings were further validated in an independent GWAS dataset. Moreover, reverse MR analysis found no evidence supporting a causal effect of ER+ breast cancer on the levels of the three identified lipid metabolites. <b>Conclusions:</b> This study provides robust genetic evidence supporting a causal role for specific lipid metabolites in the development of ER+ breast cancer. These metabolites may serve as potential biomarkers for early detection and targets for preventive interventions.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16587,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Nutrition and Metabolism\",\"volume\":\"2025 \",\"pages\":\"2292774\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12457059/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Nutrition and Metabolism\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1155/jnme/2292774\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"NUTRITION & DIETETICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Nutrition and Metabolism","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/jnme/2292774","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NUTRITION & DIETETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:脂质代谢失调与乳腺癌的发病机制有关;然而,这些关联的因果关系尚不清楚。本研究旨在探讨循环脂质代谢物与雌激素受体阳性(ER+)和ER阴性(ER-)乳腺癌风险之间的因果关系,采用双向孟德尔随机化(MR)方法。方法:我们在两个样本的磁共振分析中评估了386种循环脂质代谢物,以ER+和ER-乳腺癌为结果。根据全基因组显著性(p < 1 × 10-5)和连锁不平衡聚集(r2q检验)选择遗传工具,并进行留一分析来评估多效性和异质性。使用独立的全基因组关联研究(GWAS)数据集对ER+乳腺癌进行验证分析。反向磁共振分析也进行了评估潜在的反向因果关系。结果:在分析的386种脂质代谢物中,24种和23种分别与ER+和ER-乳腺癌有名义相关性(p < 0.05)。在应用错误发现率(FDR)校正(FDR < 0.05)后,3种代谢物——肉豆酸酯(14:1n5)、三羧酸鞘磷脂(d18:1/23:0)和5α-雄甾烷-3β, 17β-单硫酸二醇(2)——仍然与ER+乳腺癌的风险增加显著相关。相比之下,在FDR校正后,与ER-乳腺癌的关联都不明显。敏感性分析没有显示水平多效性或异质性的证据,在留一分析中,相关性仍然很强。这些发现在独立的GWAS数据集中得到了进一步验证。此外,反向磁共振分析发现,没有证据支持雌激素受体阳性乳腺癌对三种已确定的脂质代谢物水平的因果关系。结论:本研究提供了强有力的遗传证据,支持特定脂质代谢物在ER+乳腺癌发展中的因果作用。这些代谢物可以作为早期检测的潜在生物标志物和预防干预的目标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Novel Causal Evidence for the Role of Circulating Lipid Metabolites in Breast Cancer Risk: A Bidirectional Mendelian Randomization Analysis.

Background: Dysregulated lipid metabolism has been implicated in breast cancer pathogenesis; however, the causal nature of these associations remains unclear. This study aimed to investigate the causal relationships between circulating lipid metabolites and the risk of estrogen receptor-positive (ER+) and ER-negative (ER-) breast cancer using a bidirectional Mendelian randomization (MR) approach. Methods: We evaluated 386 circulating lipid metabolites as exposures in two-sample MR analyses, with ER+ and ER- breast cancer as outcomes. Genetic instruments were selected based on genome-wide significance (p < 1 × 10-5) and linkage disequilibrium clumping (R 2 < 0.01 within a 1000 kb window). The inverse variance weighted method was used as the primary analytical approach. Sensitivity analyses-including MR-Egger regression, Cochran's Q test, and leave-one-out analyses-were conducted to assess pleiotropy and heterogeneity. Validation analyses were performed using an independent genome-wide association study (GWAS) dataset for ER+ breast cancer. Reverse MR analysis was also conducted to evaluate potential reverse causality. Results: Among the 386 lipid metabolites analyzed, 24 and 23 exhibited nominal associations (p < 0.05) with ER+ and ER- breast cancer, respectively. After applying false discovery rate (FDR) correction (FDR < 0.05), three metabolites-myristoleate (14:1n5), tricosanoyl sphingomyelin (d18:1/23:0), and 5α-androstan-3β, 17β-diol monosulfate (2)-remained significantly associated with an increased risk of ER+ breast cancer. In contrast, none of the associations with ER- breast cancer remained significant after FDR correction. Sensitivity analyses indicated no evidence of horizontal pleiotropy or heterogeneity, and the associations remained robust in leave-one-out analyses. These findings were further validated in an independent GWAS dataset. Moreover, reverse MR analysis found no evidence supporting a causal effect of ER+ breast cancer on the levels of the three identified lipid metabolites. Conclusions: This study provides robust genetic evidence supporting a causal role for specific lipid metabolites in the development of ER+ breast cancer. These metabolites may serve as potential biomarkers for early detection and targets for preventive interventions.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Nutrition and Metabolism
Journal of Nutrition and Metabolism NUTRITION & DIETETICS-
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
49
审稿时长
17 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Nutrition and Metabolism is a peer-reviewed, Open Access journal that publishes original research articles, review articles, and clinical studies covering the broad and multidisciplinary field of human nutrition and metabolism. The journal welcomes submissions on studies related to obesity, diabetes, metabolic syndrome, molecular and cellular biology of nutrients, foods and dietary supplements, as well as macro- and micronutrients including vitamins and minerals.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信