Cheng Zeng, Shuning Liu, Yuhan Wei, Yalong Qi, Yujing Tan, Haili Qian, Jiani Wang, Fei Ma
{"title":"循环脂质代谢物在乳腺癌风险中的作用的新因果证据:双向孟德尔随机化分析。","authors":"Cheng Zeng, Shuning Liu, Yuhan Wei, Yalong Qi, Yujing Tan, Haili Qian, Jiani Wang, Fei Ma","doi":"10.1155/jnme/2292774","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Dysregulated lipid metabolism has been implicated in breast cancer pathogenesis; however, the causal nature of these associations remains unclear. This study aimed to investigate the causal relationships between circulating lipid metabolites and the risk of estrogen receptor-positive (ER+) and ER-negative (ER-) breast cancer using a bidirectional Mendelian randomization (MR) approach. <b>Methods:</b> We evaluated 386 circulating lipid metabolites as exposures in two-sample MR analyses, with ER+ and ER- breast cancer as outcomes. Genetic instruments were selected based on genome-wide significance (<i>p</i> < 1 × 10<sup>-5</sup>) and linkage disequilibrium clumping (<i>R</i> <sup>2</sup> < 0.01 within a 1000 kb window). The inverse variance weighted method was used as the primary analytical approach. Sensitivity analyses-including MR-Egger regression, Cochran's <i>Q</i> test, and leave-one-out analyses-were conducted to assess pleiotropy and heterogeneity. Validation analyses were performed using an independent genome-wide association study (GWAS) dataset for ER+ breast cancer. Reverse MR analysis was also conducted to evaluate potential reverse causality. <b>Results:</b> Among the 386 lipid metabolites analyzed, 24 and 23 exhibited nominal associations (<i>p</i> < 0.05) with ER+ and ER- breast cancer, respectively. After applying false discovery rate (FDR) correction (FDR < 0.05), three metabolites-myristoleate (14:1n5), tricosanoyl sphingomyelin (d18:1/23:0), and 5α-androstan-3β, 17β-diol monosulfate (2)-remained significantly associated with an increased risk of ER+ breast cancer. In contrast, none of the associations with ER- breast cancer remained significant after FDR correction. Sensitivity analyses indicated no evidence of horizontal pleiotropy or heterogeneity, and the associations remained robust in leave-one-out analyses. These findings were further validated in an independent GWAS dataset. Moreover, reverse MR analysis found no evidence supporting a causal effect of ER+ breast cancer on the levels of the three identified lipid metabolites. <b>Conclusions:</b> This study provides robust genetic evidence supporting a causal role for specific lipid metabolites in the development of ER+ breast cancer. These metabolites may serve as potential biomarkers for early detection and targets for preventive interventions.</p>","PeriodicalId":16587,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Nutrition and Metabolism","volume":"2025 ","pages":"2292774"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12457059/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Novel Causal Evidence for the Role of Circulating Lipid Metabolites in Breast Cancer Risk: A Bidirectional Mendelian Randomization Analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Cheng Zeng, Shuning Liu, Yuhan Wei, Yalong Qi, Yujing Tan, Haili Qian, Jiani Wang, Fei Ma\",\"doi\":\"10.1155/jnme/2292774\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Dysregulated lipid metabolism has been implicated in breast cancer pathogenesis; however, the causal nature of these associations remains unclear. This study aimed to investigate the causal relationships between circulating lipid metabolites and the risk of estrogen receptor-positive (ER+) and ER-negative (ER-) breast cancer using a bidirectional Mendelian randomization (MR) approach. <b>Methods:</b> We evaluated 386 circulating lipid metabolites as exposures in two-sample MR analyses, with ER+ and ER- breast cancer as outcomes. Genetic instruments were selected based on genome-wide significance (<i>p</i> < 1 × 10<sup>-5</sup>) and linkage disequilibrium clumping (<i>R</i> <sup>2</sup> < 0.01 within a 1000 kb window). The inverse variance weighted method was used as the primary analytical approach. Sensitivity analyses-including MR-Egger regression, Cochran's <i>Q</i> test, and leave-one-out analyses-were conducted to assess pleiotropy and heterogeneity. Validation analyses were performed using an independent genome-wide association study (GWAS) dataset for ER+ breast cancer. Reverse MR analysis was also conducted to evaluate potential reverse causality. <b>Results:</b> Among the 386 lipid metabolites analyzed, 24 and 23 exhibited nominal associations (<i>p</i> < 0.05) with ER+ and ER- breast cancer, respectively. After applying false discovery rate (FDR) correction (FDR < 0.05), three metabolites-myristoleate (14:1n5), tricosanoyl sphingomyelin (d18:1/23:0), and 5α-androstan-3β, 17β-diol monosulfate (2)-remained significantly associated with an increased risk of ER+ breast cancer. In contrast, none of the associations with ER- breast cancer remained significant after FDR correction. Sensitivity analyses indicated no evidence of horizontal pleiotropy or heterogeneity, and the associations remained robust in leave-one-out analyses. These findings were further validated in an independent GWAS dataset. Moreover, reverse MR analysis found no evidence supporting a causal effect of ER+ breast cancer on the levels of the three identified lipid metabolites. <b>Conclusions:</b> This study provides robust genetic evidence supporting a causal role for specific lipid metabolites in the development of ER+ breast cancer. These metabolites may serve as potential biomarkers for early detection and targets for preventive interventions.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16587,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Nutrition and Metabolism\",\"volume\":\"2025 \",\"pages\":\"2292774\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12457059/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Nutrition and Metabolism\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1155/jnme/2292774\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"NUTRITION & DIETETICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Nutrition and Metabolism","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/jnme/2292774","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NUTRITION & DIETETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Novel Causal Evidence for the Role of Circulating Lipid Metabolites in Breast Cancer Risk: A Bidirectional Mendelian Randomization Analysis.
Background: Dysregulated lipid metabolism has been implicated in breast cancer pathogenesis; however, the causal nature of these associations remains unclear. This study aimed to investigate the causal relationships between circulating lipid metabolites and the risk of estrogen receptor-positive (ER+) and ER-negative (ER-) breast cancer using a bidirectional Mendelian randomization (MR) approach. Methods: We evaluated 386 circulating lipid metabolites as exposures in two-sample MR analyses, with ER+ and ER- breast cancer as outcomes. Genetic instruments were selected based on genome-wide significance (p < 1 × 10-5) and linkage disequilibrium clumping (R2 < 0.01 within a 1000 kb window). The inverse variance weighted method was used as the primary analytical approach. Sensitivity analyses-including MR-Egger regression, Cochran's Q test, and leave-one-out analyses-were conducted to assess pleiotropy and heterogeneity. Validation analyses were performed using an independent genome-wide association study (GWAS) dataset for ER+ breast cancer. Reverse MR analysis was also conducted to evaluate potential reverse causality. Results: Among the 386 lipid metabolites analyzed, 24 and 23 exhibited nominal associations (p < 0.05) with ER+ and ER- breast cancer, respectively. After applying false discovery rate (FDR) correction (FDR < 0.05), three metabolites-myristoleate (14:1n5), tricosanoyl sphingomyelin (d18:1/23:0), and 5α-androstan-3β, 17β-diol monosulfate (2)-remained significantly associated with an increased risk of ER+ breast cancer. In contrast, none of the associations with ER- breast cancer remained significant after FDR correction. Sensitivity analyses indicated no evidence of horizontal pleiotropy or heterogeneity, and the associations remained robust in leave-one-out analyses. These findings were further validated in an independent GWAS dataset. Moreover, reverse MR analysis found no evidence supporting a causal effect of ER+ breast cancer on the levels of the three identified lipid metabolites. Conclusions: This study provides robust genetic evidence supporting a causal role for specific lipid metabolites in the development of ER+ breast cancer. These metabolites may serve as potential biomarkers for early detection and targets for preventive interventions.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Nutrition and Metabolism is a peer-reviewed, Open Access journal that publishes original research articles, review articles, and clinical studies covering the broad and multidisciplinary field of human nutrition and metabolism. The journal welcomes submissions on studies related to obesity, diabetes, metabolic syndrome, molecular and cellular biology of nutrients, foods and dietary supplements, as well as macro- and micronutrients including vitamins and minerals.