{"title":"提高玻璃离子水门铁生物活性的策略途径:结构和表面修饰方面的机制和临床观点。","authors":"Ali Saatchifard, Nader Nezafati, Saeed Hesaraki","doi":"10.1016/j.jdent.2025.106126","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>To classify and evaluate current methods that increase the bioactivity of (GICs). This will highlight their clinical relevance and mechanism.</div></div><div><h3>Data/Sources</h3><div>Relevant literature was downloaded from PubMed and ScienceDirect, without consideration for language or publication year. Experiments that examined the surface, composition, and structural modification of GICs were included, both in vitro and in vivo studies.</div></div><div><h3>Study selection</h3><div>A critical analysis reviewed literature that focused on four main strategies: surface functionalization, liquid phase modification, powder phase modification, and additive addition. The review took into account ion release, apatite formation, antibacterial, and biological response based on reported findings. The results determined powder and liquid phase interventions to improve remineralization and bonding capacity. In contrast to this, bioactive additives like Bioactive Glass (BAG), chitosan, and nanoparticles increased ion exchange and antibacterial activity. While difficult to compare due to the difference in method and lack of long-term evidence, changes at the surface level improved cellular adhesion and apatite deposition.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Our review identified several laboratory methods that increase bioactivity. However, because studies differ in methods and report inconsistent mechanical results—and because long-term clinical data are scarce—it remains unclear which approaches will provide durable advantages for patients.</div></div><div><h3>Clinical Relevance</h3><div>Revised GICs are promising as restorative materials because they can integrate better with tissue, remineralize, and be resistant to bacteria better. However, when considering using them in the clinic, doctors should also discuss the possible benefits and the current uncertainties with patients. There is no normative evidence, and different modification methods suit different people.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":15585,"journal":{"name":"Journal of dentistry","volume":"163 ","pages":"Article 106126"},"PeriodicalIF":5.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Strategic approaches for enhancing the bioactivity of glass ionomer cement: A mechanistic and clinical perspective in terms of structural and surface modifications\",\"authors\":\"Ali Saatchifard, Nader Nezafati, Saeed Hesaraki\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jdent.2025.106126\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>To classify and evaluate current methods that increase the bioactivity of (GICs). This will highlight their clinical relevance and mechanism.</div></div><div><h3>Data/Sources</h3><div>Relevant literature was downloaded from PubMed and ScienceDirect, without consideration for language or publication year. Experiments that examined the surface, composition, and structural modification of GICs were included, both in vitro and in vivo studies.</div></div><div><h3>Study selection</h3><div>A critical analysis reviewed literature that focused on four main strategies: surface functionalization, liquid phase modification, powder phase modification, and additive addition. The review took into account ion release, apatite formation, antibacterial, and biological response based on reported findings. The results determined powder and liquid phase interventions to improve remineralization and bonding capacity. In contrast to this, bioactive additives like Bioactive Glass (BAG), chitosan, and nanoparticles increased ion exchange and antibacterial activity. While difficult to compare due to the difference in method and lack of long-term evidence, changes at the surface level improved cellular adhesion and apatite deposition.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Our review identified several laboratory methods that increase bioactivity. However, because studies differ in methods and report inconsistent mechanical results—and because long-term clinical data are scarce—it remains unclear which approaches will provide durable advantages for patients.</div></div><div><h3>Clinical Relevance</h3><div>Revised GICs are promising as restorative materials because they can integrate better with tissue, remineralize, and be resistant to bacteria better. However, when considering using them in the clinic, doctors should also discuss the possible benefits and the current uncertainties with patients. There is no normative evidence, and different modification methods suit different people.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15585,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of dentistry\",\"volume\":\"163 \",\"pages\":\"Article 106126\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of dentistry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S030057122500572X\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S030057122500572X","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
Strategic approaches for enhancing the bioactivity of glass ionomer cement: A mechanistic and clinical perspective in terms of structural and surface modifications
Objectives
To classify and evaluate current methods that increase the bioactivity of (GICs). This will highlight their clinical relevance and mechanism.
Data/Sources
Relevant literature was downloaded from PubMed and ScienceDirect, without consideration for language or publication year. Experiments that examined the surface, composition, and structural modification of GICs were included, both in vitro and in vivo studies.
Study selection
A critical analysis reviewed literature that focused on four main strategies: surface functionalization, liquid phase modification, powder phase modification, and additive addition. The review took into account ion release, apatite formation, antibacterial, and biological response based on reported findings. The results determined powder and liquid phase interventions to improve remineralization and bonding capacity. In contrast to this, bioactive additives like Bioactive Glass (BAG), chitosan, and nanoparticles increased ion exchange and antibacterial activity. While difficult to compare due to the difference in method and lack of long-term evidence, changes at the surface level improved cellular adhesion and apatite deposition.
Conclusions
Our review identified several laboratory methods that increase bioactivity. However, because studies differ in methods and report inconsistent mechanical results—and because long-term clinical data are scarce—it remains unclear which approaches will provide durable advantages for patients.
Clinical Relevance
Revised GICs are promising as restorative materials because they can integrate better with tissue, remineralize, and be resistant to bacteria better. However, when considering using them in the clinic, doctors should also discuss the possible benefits and the current uncertainties with patients. There is no normative evidence, and different modification methods suit different people.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Dentistry has an open access mirror journal The Journal of Dentistry: X, sharing the same aims and scope, editorial team, submission system and rigorous peer review.
The Journal of Dentistry is the leading international dental journal within the field of Restorative Dentistry. Placing an emphasis on publishing novel and high-quality research papers, the Journal aims to influence the practice of dentistry at clinician, research, industry and policy-maker level on an international basis.
Topics covered include the management of dental disease, periodontology, endodontology, operative dentistry, fixed and removable prosthodontics, dental biomaterials science, long-term clinical trials including epidemiology and oral health, technology transfer of new scientific instrumentation or procedures, as well as clinically relevant oral biology and translational research.
The Journal of Dentistry will publish original scientific research papers including short communications. It is also interested in publishing review articles and leaders in themed areas which will be linked to new scientific research. Conference proceedings are also welcome and expressions of interest should be communicated to the Editor.