John L Havlik, Sayana Isaac, Pralahad Raman, Nathan Tran, Kalea Hidalgo, Trisha Suppes
{"title":"正在进行的精神障碍精神源性物质临床试验的特点。","authors":"John L Havlik, Sayana Isaac, Pralahad Raman, Nathan Tran, Kalea Hidalgo, Trisha Suppes","doi":"10.1097/JCP.0000000000002095","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>With a rapid rise in clinical trials investigating psychogenic substances, the field faces considerable concerns regarding transparency and conflicts of interest. This study aims to systematically characterize ongoing NIH-registered clinical trials investigating psychogenic substances for psychiatric disorders as of late 2024, including research protocols, institutional settings, and funding sources.</p><p><strong>Procedures: </strong>This cross-sectional analysis evaluated ongoing trials from ClinicalTrials.gov that studied psychogenic substances-defined as compounds significantly affecting perception, cognition, or emotion-for psychiatric conditions. Data collected included substance class, targeted diagnoses, trial phase, geographic location, study design (eg, blinding), recruitment status, and funding sources.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>A total of 181 trials met the inclusion criteria, with the majority in phase 2 (n=93; 51.4%) or phase 1 (n=33; 18.2%). The most frequently studied substances were psilocybin (n=64; 35.4%) and ketamine (n=61; 33.7%). Trials were notably concentrated within a small number of leading academic institutions. Most trials (n=148; 81.2%) listed their funding source as \"other,\" of which 127 (86.4%) were sponsored by universities or university-affiliated institutions. Blinding was not reported in 38.7% (n=70) of trials. The primary conditions studied were major depressive disorder (n=94; 51.9%), posttraumatic stress disorder (n=38; 21.0%), and alcohol use disorder (n=21; 11.6%).</p><p><strong>Implications: </strong>Ongoing clinical trials of psychogenic substances for psychiatric disorders are largely concentrated at select institutions and primarily focus on psilocybin and ketamine. The majority lack clear disclosure of funding sources, highlighting a need for enhanced transparency to build trust and facilitate the ethical advancement of this rapidly evolving area of psychiatric research.</p>","PeriodicalId":15455,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Psychopharmacology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Characteristics of Ongoing Clinical Trials of Psychogenic Substances for Psychiatric Disorders.\",\"authors\":\"John L Havlik, Sayana Isaac, Pralahad Raman, Nathan Tran, Kalea Hidalgo, Trisha Suppes\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/JCP.0000000000002095\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>With a rapid rise in clinical trials investigating psychogenic substances, the field faces considerable concerns regarding transparency and conflicts of interest. This study aims to systematically characterize ongoing NIH-registered clinical trials investigating psychogenic substances for psychiatric disorders as of late 2024, including research protocols, institutional settings, and funding sources.</p><p><strong>Procedures: </strong>This cross-sectional analysis evaluated ongoing trials from ClinicalTrials.gov that studied psychogenic substances-defined as compounds significantly affecting perception, cognition, or emotion-for psychiatric conditions. Data collected included substance class, targeted diagnoses, trial phase, geographic location, study design (eg, blinding), recruitment status, and funding sources.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>A total of 181 trials met the inclusion criteria, with the majority in phase 2 (n=93; 51.4%) or phase 1 (n=33; 18.2%). The most frequently studied substances were psilocybin (n=64; 35.4%) and ketamine (n=61; 33.7%). Trials were notably concentrated within a small number of leading academic institutions. Most trials (n=148; 81.2%) listed their funding source as \\\"other,\\\" of which 127 (86.4%) were sponsored by universities or university-affiliated institutions. Blinding was not reported in 38.7% (n=70) of trials. The primary conditions studied were major depressive disorder (n=94; 51.9%), posttraumatic stress disorder (n=38; 21.0%), and alcohol use disorder (n=21; 11.6%).</p><p><strong>Implications: </strong>Ongoing clinical trials of psychogenic substances for psychiatric disorders are largely concentrated at select institutions and primarily focus on psilocybin and ketamine. The majority lack clear disclosure of funding sources, highlighting a need for enhanced transparency to build trust and facilitate the ethical advancement of this rapidly evolving area of psychiatric research.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15455,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Clinical Psychopharmacology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Clinical Psychopharmacology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/JCP.0000000000002095\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Psychopharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/JCP.0000000000002095","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Characteristics of Ongoing Clinical Trials of Psychogenic Substances for Psychiatric Disorders.
Background: With a rapid rise in clinical trials investigating psychogenic substances, the field faces considerable concerns regarding transparency and conflicts of interest. This study aims to systematically characterize ongoing NIH-registered clinical trials investigating psychogenic substances for psychiatric disorders as of late 2024, including research protocols, institutional settings, and funding sources.
Procedures: This cross-sectional analysis evaluated ongoing trials from ClinicalTrials.gov that studied psychogenic substances-defined as compounds significantly affecting perception, cognition, or emotion-for psychiatric conditions. Data collected included substance class, targeted diagnoses, trial phase, geographic location, study design (eg, blinding), recruitment status, and funding sources.
Findings: A total of 181 trials met the inclusion criteria, with the majority in phase 2 (n=93; 51.4%) or phase 1 (n=33; 18.2%). The most frequently studied substances were psilocybin (n=64; 35.4%) and ketamine (n=61; 33.7%). Trials were notably concentrated within a small number of leading academic institutions. Most trials (n=148; 81.2%) listed their funding source as "other," of which 127 (86.4%) were sponsored by universities or university-affiliated institutions. Blinding was not reported in 38.7% (n=70) of trials. The primary conditions studied were major depressive disorder (n=94; 51.9%), posttraumatic stress disorder (n=38; 21.0%), and alcohol use disorder (n=21; 11.6%).
Implications: Ongoing clinical trials of psychogenic substances for psychiatric disorders are largely concentrated at select institutions and primarily focus on psilocybin and ketamine. The majority lack clear disclosure of funding sources, highlighting a need for enhanced transparency to build trust and facilitate the ethical advancement of this rapidly evolving area of psychiatric research.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Clinical Psychopharmacology, a leading publication in psychopharmacology, offers a wide range of articles reporting on clinical trials and studies, side effects, drug interactions, overdose management, pharmacogenetics, pharmacokinetics, and psychiatric effects of non-psychiatric drugs. The journal keeps clinician-scientists and trainees up-to-date on the latest clinical developments in psychopharmacologic agents, presenting the extensive coverage needed to keep up with every development in this fast-growing field.