兴奋剂药物使用与死亡率之间的关系。

IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q2 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
John P Morrow, Undina Moreton, Tianchen Xu, Nicholas P Tatonetti, Yuanjia Wang, B Timothy Walsh
{"title":"兴奋剂药物使用与死亡率之间的关系。","authors":"John P Morrow, Undina Moreton, Tianchen Xu, Nicholas P Tatonetti, Yuanjia Wang, B Timothy Walsh","doi":"10.1097/JCP.0000000000002066","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To assess the association between prescription stimulant medication use and mortality through an analysis of data in the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) and of electronic health records (EHR) of adult patients at a large metropolitan health care center.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The first analysis estimated the associations between the report of a sudden death event in FAERS with stimulants (methylphenidate, dextroamphetamine, dextroamphetamine-amphetamine, and lisdexamfetamine) and with 30 medications unlikely to be associated with serious adverse cardiovascular events and sudden death (control medications); propensity score matching was used to control for confounding. The second analysis estimated the associations between all-cause mortality with stimulants and with control medications in an self-controlled case series (SCCS) of EHR data; the SCCS method assessed whether, within individuals, there was an association between initiation of stimulant medication and mortality in a subsequent risk period. Data from the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) and from electronic health records (EHR) of adult at a large metropolitan health care center were analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the FAERS analyses, dextroamphetamine and methylphenidate, as well as the combined stimulant class, were significantly associated with sudden death [dextroamphetamine: RR = 2.24 (95% CI: 1.37-3.65; adjusted P < 0.001); methylphenidate: RR = 2.30 (95% CI: 1.62-3.27; adjusted P < 0.001); stimulant class: RR = 2.02 (95% CI: 1.46-2.79; adjusted P < 0.001)]. In the SCCS analyses, these 2 stimulants as well as the stimulant class were significantly associated with all-cause mortality [dextroamphetamine: RR = 3.96 [95% CI: 2.07-7.56; adjusted P < 0.001); methylphenidate: RR = 4.11 (95% CI: 1.78-9.50; adjusted P < 0.001); stimulant class: RR = 3.53 (95% CI: 1.73-7.20; adjusted P < 0.001)]. In the SCCS analysis, for all stimulants except lisdexamfetamine, the RR increased with the age at first stimulant use.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The current results document a significant association between stimulant use and mortality and underscore existing guidance to assess current cardiovascular disease and risk factors when prescribing stimulants, especially for older adults.</p>","PeriodicalId":15455,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Psychopharmacology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Association Between Stimulant Medication Use and Mortality.\",\"authors\":\"John P Morrow, Undina Moreton, Tianchen Xu, Nicholas P Tatonetti, Yuanjia Wang, B Timothy Walsh\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/JCP.0000000000002066\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To assess the association between prescription stimulant medication use and mortality through an analysis of data in the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) and of electronic health records (EHR) of adult patients at a large metropolitan health care center.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The first analysis estimated the associations between the report of a sudden death event in FAERS with stimulants (methylphenidate, dextroamphetamine, dextroamphetamine-amphetamine, and lisdexamfetamine) and with 30 medications unlikely to be associated with serious adverse cardiovascular events and sudden death (control medications); propensity score matching was used to control for confounding. The second analysis estimated the associations between all-cause mortality with stimulants and with control medications in an self-controlled case series (SCCS) of EHR data; the SCCS method assessed whether, within individuals, there was an association between initiation of stimulant medication and mortality in a subsequent risk period. Data from the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) and from electronic health records (EHR) of adult at a large metropolitan health care center were analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the FAERS analyses, dextroamphetamine and methylphenidate, as well as the combined stimulant class, were significantly associated with sudden death [dextroamphetamine: RR = 2.24 (95% CI: 1.37-3.65; adjusted P < 0.001); methylphenidate: RR = 2.30 (95% CI: 1.62-3.27; adjusted P < 0.001); stimulant class: RR = 2.02 (95% CI: 1.46-2.79; adjusted P < 0.001)]. In the SCCS analyses, these 2 stimulants as well as the stimulant class were significantly associated with all-cause mortality [dextroamphetamine: RR = 3.96 [95% CI: 2.07-7.56; adjusted P < 0.001); methylphenidate: RR = 4.11 (95% CI: 1.78-9.50; adjusted P < 0.001); stimulant class: RR = 3.53 (95% CI: 1.73-7.20; adjusted P < 0.001)]. In the SCCS analysis, for all stimulants except lisdexamfetamine, the RR increased with the age at first stimulant use.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The current results document a significant association between stimulant use and mortality and underscore existing guidance to assess current cardiovascular disease and risk factors when prescribing stimulants, especially for older adults.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15455,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Clinical Psychopharmacology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Clinical Psychopharmacology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/JCP.0000000000002066\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Psychopharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/JCP.0000000000002066","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:通过分析美国食品药品监督管理局不良事件报告系统(FAERS)和某大城市医疗保健中心成人患者电子健康记录(EHR)的数据,评估处方兴奋剂使用与死亡率之间的关系。方法:第一个分析评估了使用兴奋剂(哌甲酯、右苯丙胺、右苯丙胺-安非他明和利地苯他明)的FAERS猝死事件报告与30种不太可能与严重不良心血管事件和猝死相关的药物(对照药物)之间的关联;倾向评分匹配用于控制混杂。第二项分析估计了EHR数据中自我控制病例系列(SCCS)中兴奋剂和对照药物的全因死亡率之间的关系;SCCS方法评估了在个体中,兴奋剂药物的开始使用与随后危险期的死亡率之间是否存在关联。本文分析了来自美国食品药品监督管理局不良事件报告系统(FAERS)和某大城市医疗保健中心成人电子健康记录(EHR)的数据。结果:在FAERS分析中,右旋安非他明和哌甲酯以及联合使用的兴奋剂类别与猝死显著相关[右旋安非他明:RR = 2.24 (95% CI: 1.37-3.65;校正后P < 0.001);哌醋甲酯:RR = 2.30 (95% CI: 1.62-3.27,校正后P < 0.001);兴奋剂类别:RR = 2.02 (95% CI: 1.46-2.79;校正后P < 0.001)。在SCCS分析中,这两种兴奋剂以及兴奋剂类别与全因死亡率显著相关[右苯丙胺:RR = 3.96] 95% CI: 2.07-7.56;调整后P < 0.001);哌醋甲酯:RR = 4.11 (95% CI: 1.78-9.50,校正P < 0.001);兴奋剂类别:RR = 3.53 (95% CI: 1.73 ~ 7.20;校正后P < 0.001)。在SCCS分析中,除了利地安非他明外,所有兴奋剂的RR都随着首次使用兴奋剂的年龄而增加。结论:目前的结果证明兴奋剂使用与死亡率之间存在显著关联,并强调了在处方兴奋剂时评估当前心血管疾病和危险因素的现有指导,特别是对老年人。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Association Between Stimulant Medication Use and Mortality.

Purpose: To assess the association between prescription stimulant medication use and mortality through an analysis of data in the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) and of electronic health records (EHR) of adult patients at a large metropolitan health care center.

Methods: The first analysis estimated the associations between the report of a sudden death event in FAERS with stimulants (methylphenidate, dextroamphetamine, dextroamphetamine-amphetamine, and lisdexamfetamine) and with 30 medications unlikely to be associated with serious adverse cardiovascular events and sudden death (control medications); propensity score matching was used to control for confounding. The second analysis estimated the associations between all-cause mortality with stimulants and with control medications in an self-controlled case series (SCCS) of EHR data; the SCCS method assessed whether, within individuals, there was an association between initiation of stimulant medication and mortality in a subsequent risk period. Data from the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) and from electronic health records (EHR) of adult at a large metropolitan health care center were analyzed.

Results: In the FAERS analyses, dextroamphetamine and methylphenidate, as well as the combined stimulant class, were significantly associated with sudden death [dextroamphetamine: RR = 2.24 (95% CI: 1.37-3.65; adjusted P < 0.001); methylphenidate: RR = 2.30 (95% CI: 1.62-3.27; adjusted P < 0.001); stimulant class: RR = 2.02 (95% CI: 1.46-2.79; adjusted P < 0.001)]. In the SCCS analyses, these 2 stimulants as well as the stimulant class were significantly associated with all-cause mortality [dextroamphetamine: RR = 3.96 [95% CI: 2.07-7.56; adjusted P < 0.001); methylphenidate: RR = 4.11 (95% CI: 1.78-9.50; adjusted P < 0.001); stimulant class: RR = 3.53 (95% CI: 1.73-7.20; adjusted P < 0.001)]. In the SCCS analysis, for all stimulants except lisdexamfetamine, the RR increased with the age at first stimulant use.

Conclusions: The current results document a significant association between stimulant use and mortality and underscore existing guidance to assess current cardiovascular disease and risk factors when prescribing stimulants, especially for older adults.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
3.40%
发文量
231
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Clinical Psychopharmacology, a leading publication in psychopharmacology, offers a wide range of articles reporting on clinical trials and studies, side effects, drug interactions, overdose management, pharmacogenetics, pharmacokinetics, and psychiatric effects of non-psychiatric drugs. The journal keeps clinician-scientists and trainees up-to-date on the latest clinical developments in psychopharmacologic agents, presenting the extensive coverage needed to keep up with every development in this fast-growing field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信