Osama Elaraby, Dalia El Feky, Cigdem Yasar, Woong-Sun Yoo, Anadi Khatri, Dalia Abd Elmegid, Jia-Horung Hung, Battuya Ganbold, Zheng Xian Thng, Negin Yavari, Aim-On Saengsirinavin, Ngoc Trong Tuong Than, Frances Andrea Anover, Abdelrahman M Hamouda, S Saeed Mohammadi, Irmak Karaca, Amir Akhavanrezayat, Anh Tram Ngoc Tran, Jingli Guo, Yue Bai, Quan Dong Nguyen, Christopher Or
{"title":"产生短暂性抗阿达木单抗抗体的患者特征。","authors":"Osama Elaraby, Dalia El Feky, Cigdem Yasar, Woong-Sun Yoo, Anadi Khatri, Dalia Abd Elmegid, Jia-Horung Hung, Battuya Ganbold, Zheng Xian Thng, Negin Yavari, Aim-On Saengsirinavin, Ngoc Trong Tuong Than, Frances Andrea Anover, Abdelrahman M Hamouda, S Saeed Mohammadi, Irmak Karaca, Amir Akhavanrezayat, Anh Tram Ngoc Tran, Jingli Guo, Yue Bai, Quan Dong Nguyen, Christopher Or","doi":"10.1186/s12348-025-00520-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Adalimumab is a monoclonal antibody approved for the treatment of autoimmune diseases and non-infectious uveitis (NIU). It targets tumor necrosis factor alpha, a key mediator in inflammation. However, the development of anti-adalimumab antibodies (AAA) can reduce therapeutic efficacy and prompt treatment modifications. This study aimed to describe the clinical characteristics of patients with transient AAA and compare them to patients with persistent AAA, testing whether serum antibody and drug levels differ between groups.</p><p><strong>Main body: </strong>We conducted a retrospective cohort study using the Stanford Research Repository (STARR) to identify patients treated with adalimumab for autoimmune conditions between June 2006 and May 2024 who developed AAA. Patients whose AAA became undetectable on follow-up testing were compared to an age-, sex-, and disease-matched cohort with persistent AAA. Demographics, diagnoses, treatment details, serum adalimumab and AAA levels, and concomitant immunomodulatory therapy (IMT) were analyzed. Among 190 AAA-positive patients, 18 (9.47%) demonstrated antibody resolution over a median follow-up of 6.5 months. These patients had lower median AAA levels (39.55 ng/mL vs. 92.35 ng/mL, p=0.020) and higher adalimumab levels (6.25 μg/mL vs. 1.55 μg/mL, p=0.018) than controls. AAA resolution was negatively correlated with AAA levels (p=0.018) and positively correlated with adalimumab levels (p=0.016).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Therapeutic monitoring of AAA and drug levels may help guide personalized therapeutic strategies and support continued treatment in selected patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":16600,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Ophthalmic Inflammation and Infection","volume":"15 1","pages":"69"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12460866/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Characteristics of patients who developed transient anti-adalimumab antibodies.\",\"authors\":\"Osama Elaraby, Dalia El Feky, Cigdem Yasar, Woong-Sun Yoo, Anadi Khatri, Dalia Abd Elmegid, Jia-Horung Hung, Battuya Ganbold, Zheng Xian Thng, Negin Yavari, Aim-On Saengsirinavin, Ngoc Trong Tuong Than, Frances Andrea Anover, Abdelrahman M Hamouda, S Saeed Mohammadi, Irmak Karaca, Amir Akhavanrezayat, Anh Tram Ngoc Tran, Jingli Guo, Yue Bai, Quan Dong Nguyen, Christopher Or\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s12348-025-00520-7\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Adalimumab is a monoclonal antibody approved for the treatment of autoimmune diseases and non-infectious uveitis (NIU). It targets tumor necrosis factor alpha, a key mediator in inflammation. However, the development of anti-adalimumab antibodies (AAA) can reduce therapeutic efficacy and prompt treatment modifications. This study aimed to describe the clinical characteristics of patients with transient AAA and compare them to patients with persistent AAA, testing whether serum antibody and drug levels differ between groups.</p><p><strong>Main body: </strong>We conducted a retrospective cohort study using the Stanford Research Repository (STARR) to identify patients treated with adalimumab for autoimmune conditions between June 2006 and May 2024 who developed AAA. Patients whose AAA became undetectable on follow-up testing were compared to an age-, sex-, and disease-matched cohort with persistent AAA. Demographics, diagnoses, treatment details, serum adalimumab and AAA levels, and concomitant immunomodulatory therapy (IMT) were analyzed. Among 190 AAA-positive patients, 18 (9.47%) demonstrated antibody resolution over a median follow-up of 6.5 months. These patients had lower median AAA levels (39.55 ng/mL vs. 92.35 ng/mL, p=0.020) and higher adalimumab levels (6.25 μg/mL vs. 1.55 μg/mL, p=0.018) than controls. AAA resolution was negatively correlated with AAA levels (p=0.018) and positively correlated with adalimumab levels (p=0.016).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Therapeutic monitoring of AAA and drug levels may help guide personalized therapeutic strategies and support continued treatment in selected patients.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16600,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Ophthalmic Inflammation and Infection\",\"volume\":\"15 1\",\"pages\":\"69\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12460866/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Ophthalmic Inflammation and Infection\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12348-025-00520-7\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"OPHTHALMOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Ophthalmic Inflammation and Infection","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12348-025-00520-7","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:阿达木单抗是一种被批准用于治疗自身免疫性疾病和非感染性葡萄膜炎(NIU)的单克隆抗体。它的目标是肿瘤坏死因子-炎症的关键介质。然而,抗阿达木单抗抗体(AAA)的发展会降低治疗效果并促使治疗改变。本研究旨在描述短暂性AAA患者的临床特征,并将其与持续性AAA患者进行比较,检测两组间血清抗体和药物水平是否存在差异。主体:我们使用斯坦福研究库(STARR)进行了一项回顾性队列研究,以确定2006年6月至2024年5月期间接受阿达木单抗治疗的自身免疫性疾病患者,这些患者在随访测试中无法检测到AAA,并将其与年龄、性别和疾病匹配的持续AAA患者进行比较。统计数据、诊断、治疗细节、血清阿达木单抗和AAA水平以及伴随的免疫调节治疗(IMT)进行分析。在190例aaa阳性患者中,18例(9.47%)在中位随访6.5个月后抗体消退。与对照组相比,这些患者的中位AAA水平较低(39.55 ng/mL vs. 92.35 ng/mL, p=0.020),阿达木单抗水平较高(6.25 μg/mL vs. 1.55 μg/mL, p=0.018)。AAA分辨率与AAA水平呈负相关(p=0.018),与阿达木单抗水平呈正相关(p=0.016)。结论:治疗性监测AAA和药物水平可能有助于指导个性化治疗策略,并支持选定患者的持续治疗。
Characteristics of patients who developed transient anti-adalimumab antibodies.
Background: Adalimumab is a monoclonal antibody approved for the treatment of autoimmune diseases and non-infectious uveitis (NIU). It targets tumor necrosis factor alpha, a key mediator in inflammation. However, the development of anti-adalimumab antibodies (AAA) can reduce therapeutic efficacy and prompt treatment modifications. This study aimed to describe the clinical characteristics of patients with transient AAA and compare them to patients with persistent AAA, testing whether serum antibody and drug levels differ between groups.
Main body: We conducted a retrospective cohort study using the Stanford Research Repository (STARR) to identify patients treated with adalimumab for autoimmune conditions between June 2006 and May 2024 who developed AAA. Patients whose AAA became undetectable on follow-up testing were compared to an age-, sex-, and disease-matched cohort with persistent AAA. Demographics, diagnoses, treatment details, serum adalimumab and AAA levels, and concomitant immunomodulatory therapy (IMT) were analyzed. Among 190 AAA-positive patients, 18 (9.47%) demonstrated antibody resolution over a median follow-up of 6.5 months. These patients had lower median AAA levels (39.55 ng/mL vs. 92.35 ng/mL, p=0.020) and higher adalimumab levels (6.25 μg/mL vs. 1.55 μg/mL, p=0.018) than controls. AAA resolution was negatively correlated with AAA levels (p=0.018) and positively correlated with adalimumab levels (p=0.016).
Conclusions: Therapeutic monitoring of AAA and drug levels may help guide personalized therapeutic strategies and support continued treatment in selected patients.