预测早产和产后严重并发症的早期预警系统:范围审查。

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q3 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Eishin Nakamura, Katsuhiko Naruse, Ryuta Miyake, Tetsuya Hara, Marie Furuta, Hiroaki Tanaka, Shigetaka Matsunaga, Atsushi Sakurai, the Japan Resuscitation Council (JRC), Guideline Editorial Committee
{"title":"预测早产和产后严重并发症的早期预警系统:范围审查。","authors":"Eishin Nakamura,&nbsp;Katsuhiko Naruse,&nbsp;Ryuta Miyake,&nbsp;Tetsuya Hara,&nbsp;Marie Furuta,&nbsp;Hiroaki Tanaka,&nbsp;Shigetaka Matsunaga,&nbsp;Atsushi Sakurai,&nbsp;the Japan Resuscitation Council (JRC), Guideline Editorial Committee","doi":"10.1111/jog.70079","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Aim</h3>\n \n <p>Early warning systems (EWSs) are widely used in obstetric care to predict severe maternal complications, including postpartum hemorrhage (PPH) and sepsis. However, variations in the definitions of both EWS and target conditions hinder direct comparisons and meta-analyses. This scoping review aimed to systematically identify diagnostic accuracy studies evaluating EWS for predicting severe maternal conditions and to explore trends in this field.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>This study followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews guidelines. A systematic search of the MEDLINE/PubMed and CENTRAL databases was conducted up to July 12, 2024. Eligible studies included diagnostic accuracy studies assessing EWS in obstetric populations. Two reviewers independently screened studies, extracted data, and summarized study characteristics, including index tests and target conditions.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>A total of 93 studies involving 697,558 patients were included. The most frequently evaluated index test was the shock index (SI; 38 studies, 41%), followed by the Modified Early Obstetric Warning Score (19 studies, 20.4%) and the Obstetric Early Warning Score (10 studies, 10.8%). PPH was the most common target condition (46 studies, 49.4%), followed by sepsis (30 studies, 32.3%) and maternal death (21 studies, 22.6%). The combination of SI and PPH was most frequently assessed (20 studies).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Despite the widespread adoption of EWS in obstetric care, the marked heterogeneity in both index tests and outcome definitions highlights the need for standardized criteria and further diagnostic research.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":16593,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Research","volume":"51 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Early warning systems to predict severe complications during preterm and postpartum: A scoping review\",\"authors\":\"Eishin Nakamura,&nbsp;Katsuhiko Naruse,&nbsp;Ryuta Miyake,&nbsp;Tetsuya Hara,&nbsp;Marie Furuta,&nbsp;Hiroaki Tanaka,&nbsp;Shigetaka Matsunaga,&nbsp;Atsushi Sakurai,&nbsp;the Japan Resuscitation Council (JRC), Guideline Editorial Committee\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/jog.70079\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Aim</h3>\\n \\n <p>Early warning systems (EWSs) are widely used in obstetric care to predict severe maternal complications, including postpartum hemorrhage (PPH) and sepsis. However, variations in the definitions of both EWS and target conditions hinder direct comparisons and meta-analyses. This scoping review aimed to systematically identify diagnostic accuracy studies evaluating EWS for predicting severe maternal conditions and to explore trends in this field.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>This study followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews guidelines. A systematic search of the MEDLINE/PubMed and CENTRAL databases was conducted up to July 12, 2024. Eligible studies included diagnostic accuracy studies assessing EWS in obstetric populations. Two reviewers independently screened studies, extracted data, and summarized study characteristics, including index tests and target conditions.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>A total of 93 studies involving 697,558 patients were included. The most frequently evaluated index test was the shock index (SI; 38 studies, 41%), followed by the Modified Early Obstetric Warning Score (19 studies, 20.4%) and the Obstetric Early Warning Score (10 studies, 10.8%). PPH was the most common target condition (46 studies, 49.4%), followed by sepsis (30 studies, 32.3%) and maternal death (21 studies, 22.6%). The combination of SI and PPH was most frequently assessed (20 studies).</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\\n \\n <p>Despite the widespread adoption of EWS in obstetric care, the marked heterogeneity in both index tests and outcome definitions highlights the need for standardized criteria and further diagnostic research.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16593,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Research\",\"volume\":\"51 9\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://obgyn.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jog.70079\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://obgyn.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jog.70079","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:早期预警系统(ews)广泛应用于产科护理,以预测严重的产妇并发症,包括产后出血(PPH)和败血症。然而,EWS和目标条件定义的差异阻碍了直接比较和荟萃分析。本综述旨在系统地确定评估EWS用于预测严重产妇疾病的诊断准确性研究,并探讨该领域的发展趋势。方法:本研究遵循系统评价的首选报告项目和范围评价的元分析扩展指南。到2024年7月12日,对MEDLINE/PubMed和CENTRAL数据库进行了系统检索。符合条件的研究包括评估产科人群EWS的诊断准确性研究。两位审稿人独立筛选研究,提取数据,总结研究特征,包括指标试验和目标条件。结果:共纳入93项研究,涉及697,558例患者。最常评估的指标测试是休克指数(SI, 38项研究,41%),其次是修改早期产科预警评分(19项研究,20.4%)和产科预警评分(10项研究,10.8%)。PPH是最常见的目标疾病(46项研究,49.4%),其次是脓毒症(30项研究,32.3%)和孕产妇死亡(21项研究,22.6%)。最常评估的是SI和PPH联合(20项研究)。结论:尽管产科护理广泛采用EWS,但指标测试和结果定义的明显异质性突出了标准化标准和进一步诊断研究的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Early warning systems to predict severe complications during preterm and postpartum: A scoping review

Early warning systems to predict severe complications during preterm and postpartum: A scoping review

Aim

Early warning systems (EWSs) are widely used in obstetric care to predict severe maternal complications, including postpartum hemorrhage (PPH) and sepsis. However, variations in the definitions of both EWS and target conditions hinder direct comparisons and meta-analyses. This scoping review aimed to systematically identify diagnostic accuracy studies evaluating EWS for predicting severe maternal conditions and to explore trends in this field.

Methods

This study followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews guidelines. A systematic search of the MEDLINE/PubMed and CENTRAL databases was conducted up to July 12, 2024. Eligible studies included diagnostic accuracy studies assessing EWS in obstetric populations. Two reviewers independently screened studies, extracted data, and summarized study characteristics, including index tests and target conditions.

Results

A total of 93 studies involving 697,558 patients were included. The most frequently evaluated index test was the shock index (SI; 38 studies, 41%), followed by the Modified Early Obstetric Warning Score (19 studies, 20.4%) and the Obstetric Early Warning Score (10 studies, 10.8%). PPH was the most common target condition (46 studies, 49.4%), followed by sepsis (30 studies, 32.3%) and maternal death (21 studies, 22.6%). The combination of SI and PPH was most frequently assessed (20 studies).

Conclusions

Despite the widespread adoption of EWS in obstetric care, the marked heterogeneity in both index tests and outcome definitions highlights the need for standardized criteria and further diagnostic research.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
376
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Research is the official Journal of the Asia and Oceania Federation of Obstetrics and Gynecology and of the Japan Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology, and aims to provide a medium for the publication of articles in the fields of obstetrics and gynecology. The Journal publishes original research articles, case reports, review articles and letters to the editor. The Journal will give publication priority to original research articles over case reports. Accepted papers become the exclusive licence of the Journal. Manuscripts are peer reviewed by at least two referees and/or Associate Editors expert in the field of the submitted paper.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信