Fan Zhang, Zhang-Liang Li, Jia-Ying Wu, Yun-E Zhao
{"title":"有/无小角膜眼早期先天性白内障手术的疗效比较。","authors":"Fan Zhang, Zhang-Liang Li, Jia-Ying Wu, Yun-E Zhao","doi":"10.18240/ijo.2025.10.08","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>To find out intraoperative and postoperative outcomes of congenital cataract surgery in eyes with microcornea.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective consecutive case series study compared outcomes after congenital cataract surgery in eyes with/without microcornea. Infants (<1 year old) who underwent lensectomy surgery left aphakic were included. Microphthalmos was defined as an eye that has a horizontal corneal diameter less than or equal to 9.0 mm.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were 40 infants (54 eyes) in the microcornea group and 58 (87 eyes) in the control group. The two groups were age- and sex-matched. The microcornea group showed significantly smaller corneal diameter (<i>P</i><0.001), steeper corneal keratometry (<i>P</i>=0.001), thinner lens thickness (<i>P</i><0.001), and shorter axial length (AL, <i>P</i><0.001). And microcornea increased the incidence of poor pupil dilation (<i>P</i><0.01). The two groups showed no significant differences in postoperative intraocular pressure (IOP), best-corrected visual acuity, central corneal thickness (CCT), AL, and the incidence of strabismus and nystagmus at the last follow-up.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Although microcornea have different features from normal ones, the one-year follow-up after surgery has shown that early surgical intervention for congenital cataracts in eyes with microcornea can result in favourable outcomes with an acceptable rate of postoperative complications. Regular follow-up and timely management of postoperative complications are crucial for successful outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":14312,"journal":{"name":"International journal of ophthalmology","volume":"18 10","pages":"1875-1879"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12454020/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of outcomes after early congenital cataract surgery in eyes with/without microcornea.\",\"authors\":\"Fan Zhang, Zhang-Liang Li, Jia-Ying Wu, Yun-E Zhao\",\"doi\":\"10.18240/ijo.2025.10.08\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>To find out intraoperative and postoperative outcomes of congenital cataract surgery in eyes with microcornea.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective consecutive case series study compared outcomes after congenital cataract surgery in eyes with/without microcornea. Infants (<1 year old) who underwent lensectomy surgery left aphakic were included. Microphthalmos was defined as an eye that has a horizontal corneal diameter less than or equal to 9.0 mm.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were 40 infants (54 eyes) in the microcornea group and 58 (87 eyes) in the control group. The two groups were age- and sex-matched. The microcornea group showed significantly smaller corneal diameter (<i>P</i><0.001), steeper corneal keratometry (<i>P</i>=0.001), thinner lens thickness (<i>P</i><0.001), and shorter axial length (AL, <i>P</i><0.001). And microcornea increased the incidence of poor pupil dilation (<i>P</i><0.01). The two groups showed no significant differences in postoperative intraocular pressure (IOP), best-corrected visual acuity, central corneal thickness (CCT), AL, and the incidence of strabismus and nystagmus at the last follow-up.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Although microcornea have different features from normal ones, the one-year follow-up after surgery has shown that early surgical intervention for congenital cataracts in eyes with microcornea can result in favourable outcomes with an acceptable rate of postoperative complications. Regular follow-up and timely management of postoperative complications are crucial for successful outcomes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14312,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International journal of ophthalmology\",\"volume\":\"18 10\",\"pages\":\"1875-1879\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12454020/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International journal of ophthalmology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18240/ijo.2025.10.08\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"OPHTHALMOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of ophthalmology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18240/ijo.2025.10.08","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Comparison of outcomes after early congenital cataract surgery in eyes with/without microcornea.
Aim: To find out intraoperative and postoperative outcomes of congenital cataract surgery in eyes with microcornea.
Methods: This retrospective consecutive case series study compared outcomes after congenital cataract surgery in eyes with/without microcornea. Infants (<1 year old) who underwent lensectomy surgery left aphakic were included. Microphthalmos was defined as an eye that has a horizontal corneal diameter less than or equal to 9.0 mm.
Results: There were 40 infants (54 eyes) in the microcornea group and 58 (87 eyes) in the control group. The two groups were age- and sex-matched. The microcornea group showed significantly smaller corneal diameter (P<0.001), steeper corneal keratometry (P=0.001), thinner lens thickness (P<0.001), and shorter axial length (AL, P<0.001). And microcornea increased the incidence of poor pupil dilation (P<0.01). The two groups showed no significant differences in postoperative intraocular pressure (IOP), best-corrected visual acuity, central corneal thickness (CCT), AL, and the incidence of strabismus and nystagmus at the last follow-up.
Conclusion: Although microcornea have different features from normal ones, the one-year follow-up after surgery has shown that early surgical intervention for congenital cataracts in eyes with microcornea can result in favourable outcomes with an acceptable rate of postoperative complications. Regular follow-up and timely management of postoperative complications are crucial for successful outcomes.
期刊介绍:
· International Journal of Ophthalmology-IJO (English edition) is a global ophthalmological scientific publication
and a peer-reviewed open access periodical (ISSN 2222-3959 print, ISSN 2227-4898 online).
This journal is sponsored by Chinese Medical Association Xi’an Branch and obtains guidance and support from
WHO and ICO (International Council of Ophthalmology). It has been indexed in SCIE, PubMed,
PubMed-Central, Chemical Abstracts, Scopus, EMBASE , and DOAJ. IJO JCR IF in 2017 is 1.166.
IJO was established in 2008, with editorial office in Xi’an, China. It is a monthly publication. General Scientific
Advisors include Prof. Hugh Taylor (President of ICO); Prof.Bruce Spivey (Immediate Past President of ICO);
Prof.Mark Tso (Ex-Vice President of ICO) and Prof.Daiming Fan (Academician and Vice President,
Chinese Academy of Engineering.
International Scientific Advisors include Prof. Serge Resnikoff (WHO Senior Speciatist for Prevention of
blindness), Prof. Chi-Chao Chan (National Eye Institute, USA) and Prof. Richard L Abbott (Ex-President of
AAO/PAAO) et al.
Honorary Editors-in-Chief: Prof. Li-Xin Xie(Academician of Chinese Academy of
Engineering/Honorary President of Chinese Ophthalmological Society); Prof. Dennis Lam (President of APAO) and
Prof. Xiao-Xin Li (Ex-President of Chinese Ophthalmological Society).
Chief Editor: Prof. Xiu-Wen Hu (President of IJO Press).
Editors-in-Chief: Prof. Yan-Nian Hui (Ex-Director, Eye Institute of Chinese PLA) and
Prof. George Chiou (Founding chief editor of Journal of Ocular Pharmacology & Therapeutics).
Associate Editors-in-Chief include:
Prof. Ning-Li Wang (President Elect of APAO);
Prof. Ke Yao (President of Chinese Ophthalmological Society) ;
Prof.William Smiddy (Bascom Palmer Eye instituteUSA) ;
Prof.Joel Schuman (President of Association of University Professors of Ophthalmology,USA);
Prof.Yizhi Liu (Vice President of Chinese Ophtlalmology Society);
Prof.Yu-Sheng Wang (Director of Eye Institute of Chinese PLA);
Prof.Ling-Yun Cheng (Director of Ocular Pharmacology, Shiley Eye Center, USA).
IJO accepts contributions in English from all over the world. It includes mainly original articles and review articles,
both basic and clinical papers.
Instruction is Welcome Contribution is Welcome Citation is Welcome
Cooperation organization
International Council of Ophthalmology(ICO), PubMed, PMC, American Academy of Ophthalmology, Asia-Pacific, Thomson Reuters, The Charlesworth Group, Crossref,Scopus,Publons, DOAJ etc.