{"title":"文化和躯体化:印度东部躯体症状障碍和护理途径的横断面调查。","authors":"Bandita Abhijita, Ilambaridhi Balasubramanian, Susanta Kumar Padhy, Shree Mishra","doi":"10.1177/00207640251374137","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Somatic Symptom Disorder (SSD) involves excessive focus on physical symptoms that lack sufficient medical explanation, leading to frequent medical consultations and delays in psychiatric care. Cultural factors significantly influence the experience and reporting of somatic symptoms, yet little research has explored these factors in India, where cultural beliefs and healthcare systems largely shape illness perceptions.</p><p><strong>Objective and methods: </strong>This cross-sectional study aimed to investigate somatic symptom profiles, healthcare-seeking behaviors, and illness beliefs among 100 SSD patients visiting psychiatric department of a tertiary care hospital in India. The Bradford Somatic Inventory (BSI) assessed patients' reported somatic symptoms, while the World Health Organization (WHO) encounter form was used to evaluate their pathways to care.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Results showed the average age of participants was 38.62 (±10.59) years, with a slight female predominance (51%). Most patients were from rural areas, and the average illness duration was 7.28 (±6.11) years. On average, patients consulted eight different healthcare providers before being referred to a psychiatrist, resulting in substantial financial costs (mean of 50,000 INR). Common symptoms included lack of energy (81%), neck and shoulder pain (79%), headaches (76%), and feeling of constriction of head (76%). Participants had an average of 21.95 (±6.82) symptoms. Most of the patients had moderate or severe degree of symptoms. The prevalence and number of somatic symptoms were not influenced by the socio-demographic variables. A major finding was the discrepancy between patients' beliefs and psychiatric diagnoses. Only 10% believed their symptoms were psychiatric in origin, with most attributing them to medical conditions or stress. This led to indirect healthcare pathways, as 90% sought help from non-psychiatric providers, causing delays in appropriate care.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study highlights the need for greater awareness regarding SSD and culturally sensitive interventions to reduce delays in psychiatric referrals, improve patient outcomes, and lower unnecessary healthcare costs in India.</p>","PeriodicalId":14304,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Social Psychiatry","volume":" ","pages":"207640251374137"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Culture and Somatization: A Cross-Sectional Survey of Somatic Symptom Disorder and Pathways to Care in Eastern India.\",\"authors\":\"Bandita Abhijita, Ilambaridhi Balasubramanian, Susanta Kumar Padhy, Shree Mishra\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/00207640251374137\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Somatic Symptom Disorder (SSD) involves excessive focus on physical symptoms that lack sufficient medical explanation, leading to frequent medical consultations and delays in psychiatric care. Cultural factors significantly influence the experience and reporting of somatic symptoms, yet little research has explored these factors in India, where cultural beliefs and healthcare systems largely shape illness perceptions.</p><p><strong>Objective and methods: </strong>This cross-sectional study aimed to investigate somatic symptom profiles, healthcare-seeking behaviors, and illness beliefs among 100 SSD patients visiting psychiatric department of a tertiary care hospital in India. The Bradford Somatic Inventory (BSI) assessed patients' reported somatic symptoms, while the World Health Organization (WHO) encounter form was used to evaluate their pathways to care.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Results showed the average age of participants was 38.62 (±10.59) years, with a slight female predominance (51%). Most patients were from rural areas, and the average illness duration was 7.28 (±6.11) years. On average, patients consulted eight different healthcare providers before being referred to a psychiatrist, resulting in substantial financial costs (mean of 50,000 INR). Common symptoms included lack of energy (81%), neck and shoulder pain (79%), headaches (76%), and feeling of constriction of head (76%). Participants had an average of 21.95 (±6.82) symptoms. Most of the patients had moderate or severe degree of symptoms. The prevalence and number of somatic symptoms were not influenced by the socio-demographic variables. A major finding was the discrepancy between patients' beliefs and psychiatric diagnoses. Only 10% believed their symptoms were psychiatric in origin, with most attributing them to medical conditions or stress. This led to indirect healthcare pathways, as 90% sought help from non-psychiatric providers, causing delays in appropriate care.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study highlights the need for greater awareness regarding SSD and culturally sensitive interventions to reduce delays in psychiatric referrals, improve patient outcomes, and lower unnecessary healthcare costs in India.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14304,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Social Psychiatry\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"207640251374137\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Social Psychiatry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/00207640251374137\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHIATRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Social Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00207640251374137","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Culture and Somatization: A Cross-Sectional Survey of Somatic Symptom Disorder and Pathways to Care in Eastern India.
Background: Somatic Symptom Disorder (SSD) involves excessive focus on physical symptoms that lack sufficient medical explanation, leading to frequent medical consultations and delays in psychiatric care. Cultural factors significantly influence the experience and reporting of somatic symptoms, yet little research has explored these factors in India, where cultural beliefs and healthcare systems largely shape illness perceptions.
Objective and methods: This cross-sectional study aimed to investigate somatic symptom profiles, healthcare-seeking behaviors, and illness beliefs among 100 SSD patients visiting psychiatric department of a tertiary care hospital in India. The Bradford Somatic Inventory (BSI) assessed patients' reported somatic symptoms, while the World Health Organization (WHO) encounter form was used to evaluate their pathways to care.
Results: Results showed the average age of participants was 38.62 (±10.59) years, with a slight female predominance (51%). Most patients were from rural areas, and the average illness duration was 7.28 (±6.11) years. On average, patients consulted eight different healthcare providers before being referred to a psychiatrist, resulting in substantial financial costs (mean of 50,000 INR). Common symptoms included lack of energy (81%), neck and shoulder pain (79%), headaches (76%), and feeling of constriction of head (76%). Participants had an average of 21.95 (±6.82) symptoms. Most of the patients had moderate or severe degree of symptoms. The prevalence and number of somatic symptoms were not influenced by the socio-demographic variables. A major finding was the discrepancy between patients' beliefs and psychiatric diagnoses. Only 10% believed their symptoms were psychiatric in origin, with most attributing them to medical conditions or stress. This led to indirect healthcare pathways, as 90% sought help from non-psychiatric providers, causing delays in appropriate care.
Conclusion: This study highlights the need for greater awareness regarding SSD and culturally sensitive interventions to reduce delays in psychiatric referrals, improve patient outcomes, and lower unnecessary healthcare costs in India.
期刊介绍:
The International Journal of Social Psychiatry, established in 1954, is a leading publication dedicated to the field of social psychiatry. It serves as a platform for the exchange of research findings and discussions on the influence of social, environmental, and cultural factors on mental health and well-being. The journal is particularly relevant to psychiatrists and multidisciplinary professionals globally who are interested in understanding the broader context of psychiatric disorders and their impact on individuals and communities.
Social psychiatry, as a discipline, focuses on the origins and outcomes of mental health issues within a social framework, recognizing the interplay between societal structures and individual mental health. The journal draws connections with related fields such as social anthropology, cultural psychiatry, and sociology, and is influenced by the latest developments in these areas.
The journal also places a special emphasis on fast-track publication for brief communications, ensuring that timely and significant research can be disseminated quickly. Additionally, it strives to reflect its international readership by publishing state-of-the-art reviews from various regions around the world, showcasing the diverse practices and perspectives within the psychiatric disciplines. This approach not only contributes to the scientific understanding of social psychiatry but also supports the global exchange of knowledge and best practices in mental health care.