文化和躯体化:印度东部躯体症状障碍和护理途径的横断面调查。

IF 2.7 4区 医学 Q2 PSYCHIATRY
Bandita Abhijita, Ilambaridhi Balasubramanian, Susanta Kumar Padhy, Shree Mishra
{"title":"文化和躯体化:印度东部躯体症状障碍和护理途径的横断面调查。","authors":"Bandita Abhijita, Ilambaridhi Balasubramanian, Susanta Kumar Padhy, Shree Mishra","doi":"10.1177/00207640251374137","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Somatic Symptom Disorder (SSD) involves excessive focus on physical symptoms that lack sufficient medical explanation, leading to frequent medical consultations and delays in psychiatric care. Cultural factors significantly influence the experience and reporting of somatic symptoms, yet little research has explored these factors in India, where cultural beliefs and healthcare systems largely shape illness perceptions.</p><p><strong>Objective and methods: </strong>This cross-sectional study aimed to investigate somatic symptom profiles, healthcare-seeking behaviors, and illness beliefs among 100 SSD patients visiting psychiatric department of a tertiary care hospital in India. The Bradford Somatic Inventory (BSI) assessed patients' reported somatic symptoms, while the World Health Organization (WHO) encounter form was used to evaluate their pathways to care.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Results showed the average age of participants was 38.62 (±10.59) years, with a slight female predominance (51%). Most patients were from rural areas, and the average illness duration was 7.28 (±6.11) years. On average, patients consulted eight different healthcare providers before being referred to a psychiatrist, resulting in substantial financial costs (mean of 50,000 INR). Common symptoms included lack of energy (81%), neck and shoulder pain (79%), headaches (76%), and feeling of constriction of head (76%). Participants had an average of 21.95 (±6.82) symptoms. Most of the patients had moderate or severe degree of symptoms. The prevalence and number of somatic symptoms were not influenced by the socio-demographic variables. A major finding was the discrepancy between patients' beliefs and psychiatric diagnoses. Only 10% believed their symptoms were psychiatric in origin, with most attributing them to medical conditions or stress. This led to indirect healthcare pathways, as 90% sought help from non-psychiatric providers, causing delays in appropriate care.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study highlights the need for greater awareness regarding SSD and culturally sensitive interventions to reduce delays in psychiatric referrals, improve patient outcomes, and lower unnecessary healthcare costs in India.</p>","PeriodicalId":14304,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Social Psychiatry","volume":" ","pages":"207640251374137"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Culture and Somatization: A Cross-Sectional Survey of Somatic Symptom Disorder and Pathways to Care in Eastern India.\",\"authors\":\"Bandita Abhijita, Ilambaridhi Balasubramanian, Susanta Kumar Padhy, Shree Mishra\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/00207640251374137\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Somatic Symptom Disorder (SSD) involves excessive focus on physical symptoms that lack sufficient medical explanation, leading to frequent medical consultations and delays in psychiatric care. Cultural factors significantly influence the experience and reporting of somatic symptoms, yet little research has explored these factors in India, where cultural beliefs and healthcare systems largely shape illness perceptions.</p><p><strong>Objective and methods: </strong>This cross-sectional study aimed to investigate somatic symptom profiles, healthcare-seeking behaviors, and illness beliefs among 100 SSD patients visiting psychiatric department of a tertiary care hospital in India. The Bradford Somatic Inventory (BSI) assessed patients' reported somatic symptoms, while the World Health Organization (WHO) encounter form was used to evaluate their pathways to care.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Results showed the average age of participants was 38.62 (±10.59) years, with a slight female predominance (51%). Most patients were from rural areas, and the average illness duration was 7.28 (±6.11) years. On average, patients consulted eight different healthcare providers before being referred to a psychiatrist, resulting in substantial financial costs (mean of 50,000 INR). Common symptoms included lack of energy (81%), neck and shoulder pain (79%), headaches (76%), and feeling of constriction of head (76%). Participants had an average of 21.95 (±6.82) symptoms. Most of the patients had moderate or severe degree of symptoms. The prevalence and number of somatic symptoms were not influenced by the socio-demographic variables. A major finding was the discrepancy between patients' beliefs and psychiatric diagnoses. Only 10% believed their symptoms were psychiatric in origin, with most attributing them to medical conditions or stress. This led to indirect healthcare pathways, as 90% sought help from non-psychiatric providers, causing delays in appropriate care.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study highlights the need for greater awareness regarding SSD and culturally sensitive interventions to reduce delays in psychiatric referrals, improve patient outcomes, and lower unnecessary healthcare costs in India.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14304,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Social Psychiatry\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"207640251374137\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Social Psychiatry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/00207640251374137\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHIATRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Social Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00207640251374137","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:躯体症状障碍(Somatic Symptom Disorder, SSD)是指过度关注缺乏充分医学解释的躯体症状,导致频繁求诊和精神科护理延误。文化因素显著影响躯体症状的经历和报告,但在印度,很少有研究探讨这些因素,在那里,文化信仰和医疗体系在很大程度上塑造了对疾病的看法。目的和方法:本横断面研究旨在调查印度一家三级医院精神科就诊的100名SSD患者的躯体症状特征、求医行为和疾病信念。布拉德福德躯体量表(BSI)评估了患者报告的躯体症状,而世界卫生组织(WHO)就诊表用于评估他们的护理途径。结果:参与者的平均年龄为38.62(±10.59)岁,女性略占优势(51%)。患者多来自农村地区,平均病程7.28(±6.11)年。患者在被转介到精神科医生之前,平均咨询了8个不同的医疗保健提供者,导致大量的财务费用(平均50,000印度卢比)。常见症状包括精力不足(81%)、颈肩疼痛(79%)、头痛(76%)和头部收缩感(76%)。参与者平均有21.95(±6.82)种症状。大多数患者有中度或重度症状。躯体症状的患病率和数量不受社会人口变量的影响。一个重要的发现是病人的信念和精神病诊断之间的差异。只有10%的人认为他们的症状源于精神疾病,大多数人将其归因于医疗条件或压力。这导致了间接的医疗途径,因为90%的人寻求非精神科提供者的帮助,导致了适当护理的延误。结论:本研究强调了印度需要提高对SSD和文化敏感干预措施的认识,以减少精神病转诊延误,改善患者预后,降低不必要的医疗费用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Culture and Somatization: A Cross-Sectional Survey of Somatic Symptom Disorder and Pathways to Care in Eastern India.

Background: Somatic Symptom Disorder (SSD) involves excessive focus on physical symptoms that lack sufficient medical explanation, leading to frequent medical consultations and delays in psychiatric care. Cultural factors significantly influence the experience and reporting of somatic symptoms, yet little research has explored these factors in India, where cultural beliefs and healthcare systems largely shape illness perceptions.

Objective and methods: This cross-sectional study aimed to investigate somatic symptom profiles, healthcare-seeking behaviors, and illness beliefs among 100 SSD patients visiting psychiatric department of a tertiary care hospital in India. The Bradford Somatic Inventory (BSI) assessed patients' reported somatic symptoms, while the World Health Organization (WHO) encounter form was used to evaluate their pathways to care.

Results: Results showed the average age of participants was 38.62 (±10.59) years, with a slight female predominance (51%). Most patients were from rural areas, and the average illness duration was 7.28 (±6.11) years. On average, patients consulted eight different healthcare providers before being referred to a psychiatrist, resulting in substantial financial costs (mean of 50,000 INR). Common symptoms included lack of energy (81%), neck and shoulder pain (79%), headaches (76%), and feeling of constriction of head (76%). Participants had an average of 21.95 (±6.82) symptoms. Most of the patients had moderate or severe degree of symptoms. The prevalence and number of somatic symptoms were not influenced by the socio-demographic variables. A major finding was the discrepancy between patients' beliefs and psychiatric diagnoses. Only 10% believed their symptoms were psychiatric in origin, with most attributing them to medical conditions or stress. This led to indirect healthcare pathways, as 90% sought help from non-psychiatric providers, causing delays in appropriate care.

Conclusion: This study highlights the need for greater awareness regarding SSD and culturally sensitive interventions to reduce delays in psychiatric referrals, improve patient outcomes, and lower unnecessary healthcare costs in India.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
12.30
自引率
1.30%
发文量
120
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Social Psychiatry, established in 1954, is a leading publication dedicated to the field of social psychiatry. It serves as a platform for the exchange of research findings and discussions on the influence of social, environmental, and cultural factors on mental health and well-being. The journal is particularly relevant to psychiatrists and multidisciplinary professionals globally who are interested in understanding the broader context of psychiatric disorders and their impact on individuals and communities. Social psychiatry, as a discipline, focuses on the origins and outcomes of mental health issues within a social framework, recognizing the interplay between societal structures and individual mental health. The journal draws connections with related fields such as social anthropology, cultural psychiatry, and sociology, and is influenced by the latest developments in these areas. The journal also places a special emphasis on fast-track publication for brief communications, ensuring that timely and significant research can be disseminated quickly. Additionally, it strives to reflect its international readership by publishing state-of-the-art reviews from various regions around the world, showcasing the diverse practices and perspectives within the psychiatric disciplines. This approach not only contributes to the scientific understanding of social psychiatry but also supports the global exchange of knowledge and best practices in mental health care.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信