原发性和麻痹后面肌痉挛的眼周临床差异:回顾性比较研究。

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q2 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Indian Journal of Ophthalmology Pub Date : 2025-10-01 Epub Date: 2025-09-25 DOI:10.4103/IJO.IJO_806_25
Ali Ahmed, Naif Alsulaiman, Mostafa M Diab, Adel H Alsuhaibani
{"title":"原发性和麻痹后面肌痉挛的眼周临床差异:回顾性比较研究。","authors":"Ali Ahmed, Naif Alsulaiman, Mostafa M Diab, Adel H Alsuhaibani","doi":"10.4103/IJO.IJO_806_25","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study aims to investigate the differences in periocular features between patients with primary hemifacial spasm (HFS) and postparalytic facial spasm (PFS).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective study was conducted at two tertiary-care eye centers in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. Electronic medical records for patients diagnosed with HFS and PFS who were treated at these facilities were reviewed. Data collected included demographics, margin reflex distances (MRD1, MRD2), vertical palpebral fissure height (VPF), brow height, other Babinski signs, forehead furrow status, and synkinesis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Sixty-seven hemifacial spasm patients (mean age 47.5 ± 10.01 years; 73.1% female) were included: 33 with HFS and 34 with PFS. MRD1 was significantly higher in HFS compared to PFS (3.5 ± 0.35 mm vs. 2.0 ± 0.26 mm, P < 0.001). Similarly, MRD2 was significantly higher in HFS compared to PFS (4.5 ± 0.75 mm vs. 3.0 ± 0.21 mm, P < 0.001). VPF was significantly narrower in PFS compared to HFS (5.0 ± 0.33 mm vs. 8.0 ± 0.83 mm, P < 0.001). Oro-ocular synkinesis was significantly more prevalent in PFS compared to HFS (94.1% vs. 15.2%, P < 0.001). The other Babinski sign was more common in HFS (63.6% vs. 14.7%, P < 0.001), while brow ptosis (82.4%, P < 0.001) and synkinesis (94.1% vs. 15.2%, P < 0.001) were more frequent in PFS.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Patients with PFS typically exhibit significantly narrower palpebral fissures, upper eyelid ptosis, reverse ptosis, and brow ptosis. In contrast, those with HFS are more likely to display the \"other Babinski sign\" and prominent forehead furrows.</p>","PeriodicalId":13329,"journal":{"name":"Indian Journal of Ophthalmology","volume":"73 10","pages":"1438-1442"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Periocular clinical differences between primary and postparalytic hemifacial spasm: A retrospective comparative study.\",\"authors\":\"Ali Ahmed, Naif Alsulaiman, Mostafa M Diab, Adel H Alsuhaibani\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/IJO.IJO_806_25\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study aims to investigate the differences in periocular features between patients with primary hemifacial spasm (HFS) and postparalytic facial spasm (PFS).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective study was conducted at two tertiary-care eye centers in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. Electronic medical records for patients diagnosed with HFS and PFS who were treated at these facilities were reviewed. Data collected included demographics, margin reflex distances (MRD1, MRD2), vertical palpebral fissure height (VPF), brow height, other Babinski signs, forehead furrow status, and synkinesis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Sixty-seven hemifacial spasm patients (mean age 47.5 ± 10.01 years; 73.1% female) were included: 33 with HFS and 34 with PFS. MRD1 was significantly higher in HFS compared to PFS (3.5 ± 0.35 mm vs. 2.0 ± 0.26 mm, P < 0.001). Similarly, MRD2 was significantly higher in HFS compared to PFS (4.5 ± 0.75 mm vs. 3.0 ± 0.21 mm, P < 0.001). VPF was significantly narrower in PFS compared to HFS (5.0 ± 0.33 mm vs. 8.0 ± 0.83 mm, P < 0.001). Oro-ocular synkinesis was significantly more prevalent in PFS compared to HFS (94.1% vs. 15.2%, P < 0.001). The other Babinski sign was more common in HFS (63.6% vs. 14.7%, P < 0.001), while brow ptosis (82.4%, P < 0.001) and synkinesis (94.1% vs. 15.2%, P < 0.001) were more frequent in PFS.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Patients with PFS typically exhibit significantly narrower palpebral fissures, upper eyelid ptosis, reverse ptosis, and brow ptosis. In contrast, those with HFS are more likely to display the \\\"other Babinski sign\\\" and prominent forehead furrows.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13329,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Indian Journal of Ophthalmology\",\"volume\":\"73 10\",\"pages\":\"1438-1442\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Indian Journal of Ophthalmology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/IJO.IJO_806_25\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/9/25 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"OPHTHALMOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indian Journal of Ophthalmology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/IJO.IJO_806_25","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/9/25 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:探讨原发性面肌痉挛(HFS)和麻痹后面肌痉挛(PFS)患者眼周特征的差异。方法:在沙特阿拉伯利雅得的两家三级保健眼科中心进行回顾性研究。审查了在这些设施治疗的诊断为HFS和PFS的患者的电子医疗记录。收集的数据包括人口统计学、边缘反射距离(MRD1、MRD2)、垂睑裂高度(VPF)、眉高、其他巴宾斯基征、额沟状态和联合运动。结果:纳入面肌痉挛患者67例(平均年龄47.5±10.01岁,女性占73.1%):HFS组33例,PFS组34例。HFS组MRD1明显高于PFS组(3.5±0.35 mm vs. 2.0±0.26 mm, P < 0.001)。同样,与PFS相比,HFS组的MRD2显著高于PFS组(4.5±0.75 mm比3.0±0.21 mm, P < 0.001)。PFS组VPF明显窄于HFS组(5.0±0.33 mm vs 8.0±0.83 mm, P < 0.001)。眼-眼联动在PFS患者中比HFS患者更为普遍(94.1%比15.2%,P < 0.001)。其他Babinski征候在HFS中更为常见(63.6%比14.7%,P < 0.001),而眉下垂(82.4%,P < 0.001)和联动性(94.1%比15.2%,P < 0.001)在PFS中更为常见。结论:PFS患者通常表现为睑裂明显变窄、上睑下垂、反上睑下垂和眉下垂。相比之下,患有HFS的人更有可能表现出“其他巴宾斯基综合症”和突出的额头皱纹。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Periocular clinical differences between primary and postparalytic hemifacial spasm: A retrospective comparative study.

Purpose: This study aims to investigate the differences in periocular features between patients with primary hemifacial spasm (HFS) and postparalytic facial spasm (PFS).

Methods: A retrospective study was conducted at two tertiary-care eye centers in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. Electronic medical records for patients diagnosed with HFS and PFS who were treated at these facilities were reviewed. Data collected included demographics, margin reflex distances (MRD1, MRD2), vertical palpebral fissure height (VPF), brow height, other Babinski signs, forehead furrow status, and synkinesis.

Results: Sixty-seven hemifacial spasm patients (mean age 47.5 ± 10.01 years; 73.1% female) were included: 33 with HFS and 34 with PFS. MRD1 was significantly higher in HFS compared to PFS (3.5 ± 0.35 mm vs. 2.0 ± 0.26 mm, P < 0.001). Similarly, MRD2 was significantly higher in HFS compared to PFS (4.5 ± 0.75 mm vs. 3.0 ± 0.21 mm, P < 0.001). VPF was significantly narrower in PFS compared to HFS (5.0 ± 0.33 mm vs. 8.0 ± 0.83 mm, P < 0.001). Oro-ocular synkinesis was significantly more prevalent in PFS compared to HFS (94.1% vs. 15.2%, P < 0.001). The other Babinski sign was more common in HFS (63.6% vs. 14.7%, P < 0.001), while brow ptosis (82.4%, P < 0.001) and synkinesis (94.1% vs. 15.2%, P < 0.001) were more frequent in PFS.

Conclusion: Patients with PFS typically exhibit significantly narrower palpebral fissures, upper eyelid ptosis, reverse ptosis, and brow ptosis. In contrast, those with HFS are more likely to display the "other Babinski sign" and prominent forehead furrows.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
19.40%
发文量
1963
审稿时长
38 weeks
期刊介绍: Indian Journal of Ophthalmology covers clinical, experimental, basic science research and translational research studies related to medical, ethical and social issues in field of ophthalmology and vision science. Articles with clinical interest and implications will be given preference.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信