不同设计的根管通道腔和器械锥度对根管抗折性能的影响-体外研究。

Q3 Dentistry
Indian Journal of Dental Research Pub Date : 2025-04-01 Epub Date: 2025-09-24 DOI:10.4103/ijdr.ijdr_845_23
Vedika Talwar, Anshul Arora, Sonali Taneja
{"title":"不同设计的根管通道腔和器械锥度对根管抗折性能的影响-体外研究。","authors":"Vedika Talwar, Anshul Arora, Sonali Taneja","doi":"10.4103/ijdr.ijdr_845_23","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The aim of the study was to evaluate the effect of different designs of endodontic access cavities and instrument taper on fracture resistance.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Fifty-six extracted maxillary premolars were divided into three groups. In Group I (Negative control), the samples were left intact. In Group II, traditional cavities were prepared and in Group III truss cavities were prepared. Groups II and III were further subdivided into Subgroup A (no instrumentation), Subgroup B (instrumentation with variable taper files), and Subgroup C (instrumentation with constant taper files) followed by obturation. All samples were restored with composite restoration and subjected to compressive forces using an Instron Universal Testing Machine. Statistical analysis was performed using one-way ANOVA and Tukey's post hoc test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>This showed a significant difference in fracture resistance between Group I and all the experimental groups. A significant difference between Group II A and III A was found. Statistically significant results were obtained II A and II B and II A and II C; III A and IIIB and III A and IIIC. No significant difference was observed in fracture resistance between groups II B and II C and III B and III C.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Ultraconservative cavities showed preservation of biomechanical integrity of the tooth and conservation of fracture strength in comparison with traditional cavities before instrumentation. Instrumentation of ultraconservative and traditional cavities further decreases the fracture resistance of the tooth. However, the type of taper seemed to have minimal effect on the structural and biomechanical integrity of the tooth.</p>","PeriodicalId":13311,"journal":{"name":"Indian Journal of Dental Research","volume":" ","pages":"207-212"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effect of Different Designs of Endodontic Access Cavities and Instrument Taper on the Fracture Resistance - An In vitro Study.\",\"authors\":\"Vedika Talwar, Anshul Arora, Sonali Taneja\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/ijdr.ijdr_845_23\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The aim of the study was to evaluate the effect of different designs of endodontic access cavities and instrument taper on fracture resistance.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Fifty-six extracted maxillary premolars were divided into three groups. In Group I (Negative control), the samples were left intact. In Group II, traditional cavities were prepared and in Group III truss cavities were prepared. Groups II and III were further subdivided into Subgroup A (no instrumentation), Subgroup B (instrumentation with variable taper files), and Subgroup C (instrumentation with constant taper files) followed by obturation. All samples were restored with composite restoration and subjected to compressive forces using an Instron Universal Testing Machine. Statistical analysis was performed using one-way ANOVA and Tukey's post hoc test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>This showed a significant difference in fracture resistance between Group I and all the experimental groups. A significant difference between Group II A and III A was found. Statistically significant results were obtained II A and II B and II A and II C; III A and IIIB and III A and IIIC. No significant difference was observed in fracture resistance between groups II B and II C and III B and III C.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Ultraconservative cavities showed preservation of biomechanical integrity of the tooth and conservation of fracture strength in comparison with traditional cavities before instrumentation. Instrumentation of ultraconservative and traditional cavities further decreases the fracture resistance of the tooth. However, the type of taper seemed to have minimal effect on the structural and biomechanical integrity of the tooth.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13311,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Indian Journal of Dental Research\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"207-212\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Indian Journal of Dental Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/ijdr.ijdr_845_23\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/9/24 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Dentistry\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indian Journal of Dental Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/ijdr.ijdr_845_23","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/9/24 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Dentistry","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:探讨不同设计的根管通道腔和器械锥度对根管抗折性能的影响。方法:56颗拔除的上颌前磨牙分为3组。在第一组(阴性对照),样品保持完整。第二组制备传统空腔,第三组制备桁架空腔。II组和III组进一步细分为A亚组(无器械),B亚组(可变锥度锉的器械)和C亚组(恒定锥度锉的器械),随后进行封闭。所有样品均采用复合修复法修复,并在Instron万能试验机上承受压缩力。统计学分析采用单因素方差分析和Tukey事后检验。结果:I组与各实验组的抗骨折能力有显著性差异。II A组与III A组之间存在显著差异。ⅱA与ⅱB、ⅱA与ⅱC结果具有统计学意义;iia和iib, iia和IIIC。II B组与II C组、III B组与III C组的抗骨折性无显著差异。结论:与传统牙槽相比,超保守牙槽在内固定前保存了牙齿的生物力学完整性和骨折强度。超保守腔和传统腔的内固定进一步降低了牙齿的抗断裂能力。然而,锥度的类型似乎对牙齿的结构和生物力学完整性的影响最小。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Effect of Different Designs of Endodontic Access Cavities and Instrument Taper on the Fracture Resistance - An In vitro Study.

Objective: The aim of the study was to evaluate the effect of different designs of endodontic access cavities and instrument taper on fracture resistance.

Methods: Fifty-six extracted maxillary premolars were divided into three groups. In Group I (Negative control), the samples were left intact. In Group II, traditional cavities were prepared and in Group III truss cavities were prepared. Groups II and III were further subdivided into Subgroup A (no instrumentation), Subgroup B (instrumentation with variable taper files), and Subgroup C (instrumentation with constant taper files) followed by obturation. All samples were restored with composite restoration and subjected to compressive forces using an Instron Universal Testing Machine. Statistical analysis was performed using one-way ANOVA and Tukey's post hoc test.

Results: This showed a significant difference in fracture resistance between Group I and all the experimental groups. A significant difference between Group II A and III A was found. Statistically significant results were obtained II A and II B and II A and II C; III A and IIIB and III A and IIIC. No significant difference was observed in fracture resistance between groups II B and II C and III B and III C.

Conclusion: Ultraconservative cavities showed preservation of biomechanical integrity of the tooth and conservation of fracture strength in comparison with traditional cavities before instrumentation. Instrumentation of ultraconservative and traditional cavities further decreases the fracture resistance of the tooth. However, the type of taper seemed to have minimal effect on the structural and biomechanical integrity of the tooth.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Indian Journal of Dental Research
Indian Journal of Dental Research Dentistry-Dentistry (all)
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
80
审稿时长
38 weeks
期刊介绍: Indian Journal of Dental Research (IJDR) is the official publication of the Indian Society for Dental Research (ISDR), India section of the International Association for Dental Research (IADR), published quarterly. IJDR publishes scientific papers on well designed and controlled original research involving orodental sciences. Papers may also include reports on unusual and interesting case presentations and invited review papers on significant topics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信