病理亚型和抽样策略决定诊断敏感性宫颈淋巴结结核:回顾性研究。

IF 4.8 2区 医学 Q2 IMMUNOLOGY
Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology Pub Date : 2025-09-09 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fcimb.2025.1662518
Xiaoyu Liu, Xuan Wang, Yuejie Li, Qibin Liu, Chao Quan, Xiyong Dai
{"title":"病理亚型和抽样策略决定诊断敏感性宫颈淋巴结结核:回顾性研究。","authors":"Xiaoyu Liu, Xuan Wang, Yuejie Li, Qibin Liu, Chao Quan, Xiyong Dai","doi":"10.3389/fcimb.2025.1662518","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To investigate how pathological types and sampling methods affect positivity rates of five diagnostic techniques in cervical lymph node tuberculosis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively analyzed 198 surgically confirmed cervical lymph node tuberculosis patients from Wuhan Pulmonary Hospital. Cases were stratified by pathological subtypes and collection methods. The specimens were tested using acid-fast bacillus smear microscopy, mycobacterium tuberculosis culture, quantitative polymerase chain reaction for tuberculosis DNA, simultaneous amplification and testing for tuberculosis, or GeneXpert.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All 198 cases showed granulomatous inflammation. Liquefactive necrosis occurred in 91.92% (182/198) of cases, with caseous necrosis in 87.88% (174/198), adjacent soft-tissue necrosis in 57.07% (113/198), and suppurative inflammation in 20.20% (40/198). Solid alterations without liquefactive necrosis (coagulative necrosis/non-necrotizing lymphadenitis) comprised 8.08% (16/198). The overall etiological positivity rate was 90.40% (179/198). GeneXpert showed highest sensitivity (90.36%), followed by tuberculosis DNA (74.24%), simultaneous amplification and testing (40.22%), Mycobacterium tuberculosis culture (16.67%), and acid-fast bacillus smear (14.72%). Among 33 culture-positive cases, 32 (96.97%) were GeneXpert positive. Rifampicin resistance detected by GeneXpert was 5.62% (10/178). In specimens with caseous necrosis, soft-tissue necrosis, or liquefactive necrosis, GeneXpert positivity significantly exceeded tuberculosis DNA (all P < 0.01). Liquefactive necrosis samples showed higher positivity than solid-change specimens for all techniques except culture (all P < 0.001). Drainage specimens yielded higher tuberculosis DNA and GeneXpert positivity than surgical resection specimens. Combining surgical and drainage specimens increased culture positivity to 26.09%.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Etiological positivity rates in cervical lymph node tuberculosis correlate with pathological features. Maximizing liquefactive necrosis sampling for the GeneXpert assay and combining different sampling techniques (such as, surgical resection, incision and drainage, needle biopsy) for etiological detection enhances diagnostic accuracy.</p>","PeriodicalId":12458,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology","volume":"15 ","pages":"1662518"},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12454339/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Pathological subtypes and sampling strategies determine diagnostic sensitivity in cervical lymph node tuberculosis: a retrospective study.\",\"authors\":\"Xiaoyu Liu, Xuan Wang, Yuejie Li, Qibin Liu, Chao Quan, Xiyong Dai\",\"doi\":\"10.3389/fcimb.2025.1662518\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To investigate how pathological types and sampling methods affect positivity rates of five diagnostic techniques in cervical lymph node tuberculosis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively analyzed 198 surgically confirmed cervical lymph node tuberculosis patients from Wuhan Pulmonary Hospital. Cases were stratified by pathological subtypes and collection methods. The specimens were tested using acid-fast bacillus smear microscopy, mycobacterium tuberculosis culture, quantitative polymerase chain reaction for tuberculosis DNA, simultaneous amplification and testing for tuberculosis, or GeneXpert.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All 198 cases showed granulomatous inflammation. Liquefactive necrosis occurred in 91.92% (182/198) of cases, with caseous necrosis in 87.88% (174/198), adjacent soft-tissue necrosis in 57.07% (113/198), and suppurative inflammation in 20.20% (40/198). Solid alterations without liquefactive necrosis (coagulative necrosis/non-necrotizing lymphadenitis) comprised 8.08% (16/198). The overall etiological positivity rate was 90.40% (179/198). GeneXpert showed highest sensitivity (90.36%), followed by tuberculosis DNA (74.24%), simultaneous amplification and testing (40.22%), Mycobacterium tuberculosis culture (16.67%), and acid-fast bacillus smear (14.72%). Among 33 culture-positive cases, 32 (96.97%) were GeneXpert positive. Rifampicin resistance detected by GeneXpert was 5.62% (10/178). In specimens with caseous necrosis, soft-tissue necrosis, or liquefactive necrosis, GeneXpert positivity significantly exceeded tuberculosis DNA (all P < 0.01). Liquefactive necrosis samples showed higher positivity than solid-change specimens for all techniques except culture (all P < 0.001). Drainage specimens yielded higher tuberculosis DNA and GeneXpert positivity than surgical resection specimens. Combining surgical and drainage specimens increased culture positivity to 26.09%.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Etiological positivity rates in cervical lymph node tuberculosis correlate with pathological features. Maximizing liquefactive necrosis sampling for the GeneXpert assay and combining different sampling techniques (such as, surgical resection, incision and drainage, needle biopsy) for etiological detection enhances diagnostic accuracy.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12458,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology\",\"volume\":\"15 \",\"pages\":\"1662518\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12454339/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3389/fcimb.2025.1662518\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"IMMUNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fcimb.2025.1662518","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:探讨颈淋巴结结核的病理类型和抽样方法对五种诊断技术阳性率的影响。方法回顾性分析武汉肺科医院198例经手术确诊的颈淋巴结结核患者。按病理分型和收集方法对病例进行分层。采用抗酸芽孢杆菌涂片镜检、结核分枝杆菌培养、结核DNA定量聚合酶链反应、同时扩增和结核检测或GeneXpert对标本进行检测。结果:198例均表现为肉芽肿性炎症。液化性坏死占91.92%(182/198),干酪样坏死占87.88%(174/198),邻近软组织坏死占57.07%(113/198),化脓性炎症占20.20%(40/198)。无液化性坏死(凝固性坏死/非坏死性淋巴结炎)的实性改变占8.08%(16/198)。总病原学阳性率为90.40%(179/198)。GeneXpert灵敏度最高(90.36%),其次为结核DNA(74.24%)、同时扩增检测(40.22%)、结核分枝杆菌培养(16.67%)和抗酸杆菌涂片(14.72%)。33例培养阳性病例中,GeneXpert阳性32例(96.97%)。GeneXpert检测利福平耐药率为5.62%(10/178)。在干酪样坏死、软组织坏死和液化性坏死的标本中,GeneXpert阳性水平明显高于结核DNA (P < 0.01)。液化性坏死样本在除培养外的所有技术中均比固体坏死样本阳性率高(均P < 0.001)。引流标本结核DNA和GeneXpert阳性高于手术切除标本。结合手术和引流标本,培养阳性率提高到26.09%。结论:颈淋巴结结核的病原学阳性率与病理特征有关。为GeneXpert检测提供最大限度的液化性坏死取样,并结合不同的取样技术(如手术切除、切开引流、穿刺活检)进行病因检测,可提高诊断准确性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Pathological subtypes and sampling strategies determine diagnostic sensitivity in cervical lymph node tuberculosis: a retrospective study.

Objective: To investigate how pathological types and sampling methods affect positivity rates of five diagnostic techniques in cervical lymph node tuberculosis.

Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 198 surgically confirmed cervical lymph node tuberculosis patients from Wuhan Pulmonary Hospital. Cases were stratified by pathological subtypes and collection methods. The specimens were tested using acid-fast bacillus smear microscopy, mycobacterium tuberculosis culture, quantitative polymerase chain reaction for tuberculosis DNA, simultaneous amplification and testing for tuberculosis, or GeneXpert.

Results: All 198 cases showed granulomatous inflammation. Liquefactive necrosis occurred in 91.92% (182/198) of cases, with caseous necrosis in 87.88% (174/198), adjacent soft-tissue necrosis in 57.07% (113/198), and suppurative inflammation in 20.20% (40/198). Solid alterations without liquefactive necrosis (coagulative necrosis/non-necrotizing lymphadenitis) comprised 8.08% (16/198). The overall etiological positivity rate was 90.40% (179/198). GeneXpert showed highest sensitivity (90.36%), followed by tuberculosis DNA (74.24%), simultaneous amplification and testing (40.22%), Mycobacterium tuberculosis culture (16.67%), and acid-fast bacillus smear (14.72%). Among 33 culture-positive cases, 32 (96.97%) were GeneXpert positive. Rifampicin resistance detected by GeneXpert was 5.62% (10/178). In specimens with caseous necrosis, soft-tissue necrosis, or liquefactive necrosis, GeneXpert positivity significantly exceeded tuberculosis DNA (all P < 0.01). Liquefactive necrosis samples showed higher positivity than solid-change specimens for all techniques except culture (all P < 0.001). Drainage specimens yielded higher tuberculosis DNA and GeneXpert positivity than surgical resection specimens. Combining surgical and drainage specimens increased culture positivity to 26.09%.

Conclusion: Etiological positivity rates in cervical lymph node tuberculosis correlate with pathological features. Maximizing liquefactive necrosis sampling for the GeneXpert assay and combining different sampling techniques (such as, surgical resection, incision and drainage, needle biopsy) for etiological detection enhances diagnostic accuracy.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.90
自引率
7.00%
发文量
1817
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊介绍: Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology is a leading specialty journal, publishing rigorously peer-reviewed research across all pathogenic microorganisms and their interaction with their hosts. Chief Editor Yousef Abu Kwaik, University of Louisville is supported by an outstanding Editorial Board of international experts. This multidisciplinary open-access journal is at the forefront of disseminating and communicating scientific knowledge and impactful discoveries to researchers, academics, clinicians and the public worldwide. Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology includes research on bacteria, fungi, parasites, viruses, endosymbionts, prions and all microbial pathogens as well as the microbiota and its effect on health and disease in various hosts. The research approaches include molecular microbiology, cellular microbiology, gene regulation, proteomics, signal transduction, pathogenic evolution, genomics, structural biology, and virulence factors as well as model hosts. Areas of research to counteract infectious agents by the host include the host innate and adaptive immune responses as well as metabolic restrictions to various pathogenic microorganisms, vaccine design and development against various pathogenic microorganisms, and the mechanisms of antibiotic resistance and its countermeasures.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信