用人际反应指数(IRI)和基于故事的共情任务(SET)对瑞士南部轻度认知障碍患者共情的初步临床比较研究。

IF 4.5 2区 医学 Q2 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY
Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience Pub Date : 2025-09-09 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fnagi.2025.1661172
L Arnaud, L Morellini, L G Rege-Colet, A Pagnamenta, E Fontana, M Lissi, R Morese, L Sacco
{"title":"用人际反应指数(IRI)和基于故事的共情任务(SET)对瑞士南部轻度认知障碍患者共情的初步临床比较研究。","authors":"L Arnaud, L Morellini, L G Rege-Colet, A Pagnamenta, E Fontana, M Lissi, R Morese, L Sacco","doi":"10.3389/fnagi.2025.1661172","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI) is a transitional stage between normal aging and dementia, frequently associated with subtle deficits in social cognition. Empathy, a core component of social cognition, encompasses both affective and cognitive dimensions and may be compromised even in prodromal phases of neurodegenerative conditions. Despite its clinical relevance, empathy in MCI remains underexplored, and standardized assessment tools are seldom used in routine diagnostics. Theory of mind is another important aspect of social cognition, and, as with empathy, it is unclear how it is affected at the MCI stage. This study aimed to investigate empathy and theory of mind abilities in individuals with MCI, excluding cases attributable to prodromal frontotemporal dementia, using two validated instruments: the Interpersonal reactivity index (IRI) and the Story-based empathy task (SET).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a case-control study involving 23 individuals with MCI and 25 cognitively healthy controls. All participants completed the IRI, while a subsample (19 MCI patients) also underwent the SET. The clinical group included both amnestic and non-amnestic MCI subtypes, with heterogeneous etiologies. Group comparisons were performed on IRI subscales and SET indices to assess both self-reported empathy traits and performance-based socio-cognitive abilities.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The MCI group exhibited significantly lower scores in the IRI subscales of Empathic Concern and Perspective Taking compared to controls, indicating concurrent affective and cognitive empathy impairments. While no significant differences emerged in individual SET subcomponents, the MCI group showed a significantly lower global SET score, suggesting reduced integrative socio-cognitive performance. These findings should be interpreted with caution given the limited sample size and clinical heterogeneity, which make this a preliminary study.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>These findings provide preliminary evidence of early empathy-related and theory of mind alterations in MCI, supporting the inclusion of social cognition assessments in standard neuropsychological protocols. The combined use of self-report and task-based instruments may enhance early identification of socio-emotional dysfunctions and inform personalized clinical interventions. The preliminary nature of this study is mainly due to the small sample size and the heterogeneous clinical profiles, which limit generalizability but highlight the need for replication in larger cohorts.</p>","PeriodicalId":12450,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience","volume":"17 ","pages":"1661172"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12454364/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Empathy in mild cognitive impairment: a preliminary clinical comparative study in Southern Switzerland using the interpersonal reactivity index (IRI) and the story-based empathy task (SET).\",\"authors\":\"L Arnaud, L Morellini, L G Rege-Colet, A Pagnamenta, E Fontana, M Lissi, R Morese, L Sacco\",\"doi\":\"10.3389/fnagi.2025.1661172\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI) is a transitional stage between normal aging and dementia, frequently associated with subtle deficits in social cognition. Empathy, a core component of social cognition, encompasses both affective and cognitive dimensions and may be compromised even in prodromal phases of neurodegenerative conditions. Despite its clinical relevance, empathy in MCI remains underexplored, and standardized assessment tools are seldom used in routine diagnostics. Theory of mind is another important aspect of social cognition, and, as with empathy, it is unclear how it is affected at the MCI stage. This study aimed to investigate empathy and theory of mind abilities in individuals with MCI, excluding cases attributable to prodromal frontotemporal dementia, using two validated instruments: the Interpersonal reactivity index (IRI) and the Story-based empathy task (SET).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a case-control study involving 23 individuals with MCI and 25 cognitively healthy controls. All participants completed the IRI, while a subsample (19 MCI patients) also underwent the SET. The clinical group included both amnestic and non-amnestic MCI subtypes, with heterogeneous etiologies. Group comparisons were performed on IRI subscales and SET indices to assess both self-reported empathy traits and performance-based socio-cognitive abilities.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The MCI group exhibited significantly lower scores in the IRI subscales of Empathic Concern and Perspective Taking compared to controls, indicating concurrent affective and cognitive empathy impairments. While no significant differences emerged in individual SET subcomponents, the MCI group showed a significantly lower global SET score, suggesting reduced integrative socio-cognitive performance. These findings should be interpreted with caution given the limited sample size and clinical heterogeneity, which make this a preliminary study.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>These findings provide preliminary evidence of early empathy-related and theory of mind alterations in MCI, supporting the inclusion of social cognition assessments in standard neuropsychological protocols. The combined use of self-report and task-based instruments may enhance early identification of socio-emotional dysfunctions and inform personalized clinical interventions. The preliminary nature of this study is mainly due to the small sample size and the heterogeneous clinical profiles, which limit generalizability but highlight the need for replication in larger cohorts.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12450,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience\",\"volume\":\"17 \",\"pages\":\"1661172\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12454364/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3389/fnagi.2025.1661172\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fnagi.2025.1661172","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

轻度认知障碍(Mild Cognitive Impairment, MCI)是介于正常衰老和痴呆之间的过渡阶段,常伴有社会认知的细微缺陷。共情是社会认知的核心组成部分,包括情感和认知两个维度,甚至在神经退行性疾病的前驱期也可能受到损害。尽管其临床相关性,MCI中的共情仍未得到充分研究,标准化评估工具很少用于常规诊断。心理理论是社会认知的另一个重要方面,和同理心一样,目前还不清楚它在MCI阶段是如何受到影响的。本研究采用人际反应指数(IRI)和基于故事的共情任务(SET)两种有效工具,探讨MCI患者的共情能力和心理理论能力(不包括前驱额颞叶痴呆)。方法:我们进行了一项病例对照研究,涉及23名轻度认知障碍患者和25名认知健康对照。所有参与者都完成了IRI,而一个子样本(19名MCI患者)也接受了SET。临床组包括遗忘型和非遗忘型MCI亚型,具有不同的病因。在IRI量表和SET指数上进行组间比较,以评估自我报告的共情特征和基于绩效的社会认知能力。结果:MCI组在共情关注和观点采取的IRI分量表得分显著低于对照组,表明情感和认知共情障碍同时存在。虽然单个SET子成分没有显著差异,但MCI组的整体SET得分显著降低,表明综合社会认知表现降低。考虑到有限的样本量和临床异质性,这些发现应谨慎解释,这使得这是一项初步研究。结论:这些发现提供了MCI早期共情相关和心理理论改变的初步证据,支持将社会认知评估纳入标准神经心理学协议。结合使用自我报告和基于任务的工具可以增强对社会情绪功能障碍的早期识别,并为个性化的临床干预提供信息。这项研究的初步性质主要是由于样本量小,临床资料不均匀,这限制了通用性,但强调需要在更大的队列中进行复制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Empathy in mild cognitive impairment: a preliminary clinical comparative study in Southern Switzerland using the interpersonal reactivity index (IRI) and the story-based empathy task (SET).

Introduction: Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI) is a transitional stage between normal aging and dementia, frequently associated with subtle deficits in social cognition. Empathy, a core component of social cognition, encompasses both affective and cognitive dimensions and may be compromised even in prodromal phases of neurodegenerative conditions. Despite its clinical relevance, empathy in MCI remains underexplored, and standardized assessment tools are seldom used in routine diagnostics. Theory of mind is another important aspect of social cognition, and, as with empathy, it is unclear how it is affected at the MCI stage. This study aimed to investigate empathy and theory of mind abilities in individuals with MCI, excluding cases attributable to prodromal frontotemporal dementia, using two validated instruments: the Interpersonal reactivity index (IRI) and the Story-based empathy task (SET).

Methods: We conducted a case-control study involving 23 individuals with MCI and 25 cognitively healthy controls. All participants completed the IRI, while a subsample (19 MCI patients) also underwent the SET. The clinical group included both amnestic and non-amnestic MCI subtypes, with heterogeneous etiologies. Group comparisons were performed on IRI subscales and SET indices to assess both self-reported empathy traits and performance-based socio-cognitive abilities.

Results: The MCI group exhibited significantly lower scores in the IRI subscales of Empathic Concern and Perspective Taking compared to controls, indicating concurrent affective and cognitive empathy impairments. While no significant differences emerged in individual SET subcomponents, the MCI group showed a significantly lower global SET score, suggesting reduced integrative socio-cognitive performance. These findings should be interpreted with caution given the limited sample size and clinical heterogeneity, which make this a preliminary study.

Conclusion: These findings provide preliminary evidence of early empathy-related and theory of mind alterations in MCI, supporting the inclusion of social cognition assessments in standard neuropsychological protocols. The combined use of self-report and task-based instruments may enhance early identification of socio-emotional dysfunctions and inform personalized clinical interventions. The preliminary nature of this study is mainly due to the small sample size and the heterogeneous clinical profiles, which limit generalizability but highlight the need for replication in larger cohorts.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience
Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY-NEUROSCIENCES
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
8.30%
发文量
1426
期刊介绍: Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience is a leading journal in its field, publishing rigorously peer-reviewed research that advances our understanding of the mechanisms of Central Nervous System aging and age-related neural diseases. Specialty Chief Editor Thomas Wisniewski at the New York University School of Medicine is supported by an outstanding Editorial Board of international researchers. This multidisciplinary open-access journal is at the forefront of disseminating and communicating scientific knowledge and impactful discoveries to researchers, academics, clinicians and the public worldwide.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信