肺切除术后利多卡因与舒芬太尼PCIA:一项随机对照试验。

IF 5.1 2区 医学 Q1 CHEMISTRY, MEDICINAL
Drug Design, Development and Therapy Pub Date : 2025-09-19 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.2147/DDDT.S538226
Bin Tian, Yumin Wu, Wenjie Zhang, Ruijuan Liu, Song Qu, Zhenying Zhang, Wenjun Yan
{"title":"肺切除术后利多卡因与舒芬太尼PCIA:一项随机对照试验。","authors":"Bin Tian, Yumin Wu, Wenjie Zhang, Ruijuan Liu, Song Qu, Zhenying Zhang, Wenjun Yan","doi":"10.2147/DDDT.S538226","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>We investigated the efficacy and safety of lidocaine-based patient-controlled intravenous analgesia (PCIA), compared with sufentanil-based PCIA on postoperative pain and recovery quality in patients undergoing thoracoscopic lung surgery.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We recruited 160 patients undergoing thoracoscopic lung surgery who were randomized to receive lidocaine-based PCIA (1.5 mg/kg/h) or sufentanil-based PCIA (2 μg/mL) within 48 hours postoperatively. The primary endpoint was visual analogue scores (VAS) pain scores at 6, 12, 24, and 48 hours postoperatively. Postoperative quality of recovery-15 (QoR-15) scores and other prespecified endpoints were also recorded.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>VAS pain scores at rest and during coughing in the lidocaine group were significantly lower at 6, 12, and 24 hours postoperatively (<i>P</i><0.05), with no difference at 48 hours (<i>P></i>0.05). QoR-15 scores in the lidocaine group were higher on postoperative day (POD) 1 (<i>P</i><0.001) and POD2 (<i>P</i><0.001), with significant differences in the two dimensions of postoperative physical comfort and pain (<i>P</i><0.001). The lidocaine group also experienced a shorter time to first flatus, defecation, and ambulation (<i>P</i><0.05), with no difference in the length of postoperative hospitalization and thoracic drainage time (<i>P></i>0.05). The serum IL-6, TNF-α, IL-8, cortisol, and epinephrine concentrations were lower in the lidocaine group on POD1 and POD2 (<i>P</i><0.05). The incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting in the lidocaine group was lower (<i>P</i><0.05), with no differences in other adverse events (<i>P</i>>0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Compared with sufentanil-based PCIA, lidocaine-based PCIA significantly relieved postoperative pain and improved recovery quality after thoracoscopic lung surgery with fewer postoperative adverse events, which is a considerable choice for postoperative analgesia.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>This study was retrospectively registered at the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry on March 1st, 2023 (number ChiCTR2300068840).</p>","PeriodicalId":11290,"journal":{"name":"Drug Design, Development and Therapy","volume":"19 ","pages":"8541-8553"},"PeriodicalIF":5.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12456753/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Lidocaine-Based vs Sufentanil-Based PCIA After Pulmonary Resection Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Trial.\",\"authors\":\"Bin Tian, Yumin Wu, Wenjie Zhang, Ruijuan Liu, Song Qu, Zhenying Zhang, Wenjun Yan\",\"doi\":\"10.2147/DDDT.S538226\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>We investigated the efficacy and safety of lidocaine-based patient-controlled intravenous analgesia (PCIA), compared with sufentanil-based PCIA on postoperative pain and recovery quality in patients undergoing thoracoscopic lung surgery.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We recruited 160 patients undergoing thoracoscopic lung surgery who were randomized to receive lidocaine-based PCIA (1.5 mg/kg/h) or sufentanil-based PCIA (2 μg/mL) within 48 hours postoperatively. The primary endpoint was visual analogue scores (VAS) pain scores at 6, 12, 24, and 48 hours postoperatively. Postoperative quality of recovery-15 (QoR-15) scores and other prespecified endpoints were also recorded.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>VAS pain scores at rest and during coughing in the lidocaine group were significantly lower at 6, 12, and 24 hours postoperatively (<i>P</i><0.05), with no difference at 48 hours (<i>P></i>0.05). QoR-15 scores in the lidocaine group were higher on postoperative day (POD) 1 (<i>P</i><0.001) and POD2 (<i>P</i><0.001), with significant differences in the two dimensions of postoperative physical comfort and pain (<i>P</i><0.001). The lidocaine group also experienced a shorter time to first flatus, defecation, and ambulation (<i>P</i><0.05), with no difference in the length of postoperative hospitalization and thoracic drainage time (<i>P></i>0.05). The serum IL-6, TNF-α, IL-8, cortisol, and epinephrine concentrations were lower in the lidocaine group on POD1 and POD2 (<i>P</i><0.05). The incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting in the lidocaine group was lower (<i>P</i><0.05), with no differences in other adverse events (<i>P</i>>0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Compared with sufentanil-based PCIA, lidocaine-based PCIA significantly relieved postoperative pain and improved recovery quality after thoracoscopic lung surgery with fewer postoperative adverse events, which is a considerable choice for postoperative analgesia.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>This study was retrospectively registered at the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry on March 1st, 2023 (number ChiCTR2300068840).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11290,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Drug Design, Development and Therapy\",\"volume\":\"19 \",\"pages\":\"8541-8553\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12456753/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Drug Design, Development and Therapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2147/DDDT.S538226\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CHEMISTRY, MEDICINAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Drug Design, Development and Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/DDDT.S538226","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MEDICINAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:我们研究了以利多卡因为基础的患者自控静脉镇痛(PCIA)的有效性和安全性,比较了以舒芬太尼为基础的PCIA对胸腔镜肺手术患者术后疼痛和恢复质量的影响。方法:我们招募了160例胸腔镜肺手术患者,他们在术后48小时内随机接受利多卡因PCIA (1.5 mg/kg/h)或舒芬太尼PCIA (2 μg/mL)。主要终点是术后6、12、24和48小时的视觉模拟评分(VAS)疼痛评分。术后恢复质量15 (QoR-15)评分和其他预定终点也被记录。结果:利多卡因组患者术后6、12、24 h静息及咳嗽时VAS疼痛评分均显著低于对照组(p < 0.05)。利多卡因组QoR-15评分在术后第1天(POD)更高(PPPPP>0.05)。利多卡因组在POD1和POD2上的血清IL-6、TNF-α、IL-8、皮质醇和肾上腺素浓度较低(PPP 0.05)。结论:与舒芬太尼为基础的PCIA相比,利多卡因为基础的PCIA可显著缓解胸腔镜肺手术术后疼痛,提高术后恢复质量,术后不良事件较少,是术后镇痛的重要选择。试验注册:本研究于2023年3月1日在中国临床试验注册中心回顾性注册(编号ChiCTR2300068840)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Lidocaine-Based vs Sufentanil-Based PCIA After Pulmonary Resection Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Background: We investigated the efficacy and safety of lidocaine-based patient-controlled intravenous analgesia (PCIA), compared with sufentanil-based PCIA on postoperative pain and recovery quality in patients undergoing thoracoscopic lung surgery.

Methods: We recruited 160 patients undergoing thoracoscopic lung surgery who were randomized to receive lidocaine-based PCIA (1.5 mg/kg/h) or sufentanil-based PCIA (2 μg/mL) within 48 hours postoperatively. The primary endpoint was visual analogue scores (VAS) pain scores at 6, 12, 24, and 48 hours postoperatively. Postoperative quality of recovery-15 (QoR-15) scores and other prespecified endpoints were also recorded.

Results: VAS pain scores at rest and during coughing in the lidocaine group were significantly lower at 6, 12, and 24 hours postoperatively (P<0.05), with no difference at 48 hours (P>0.05). QoR-15 scores in the lidocaine group were higher on postoperative day (POD) 1 (P<0.001) and POD2 (P<0.001), with significant differences in the two dimensions of postoperative physical comfort and pain (P<0.001). The lidocaine group also experienced a shorter time to first flatus, defecation, and ambulation (P<0.05), with no difference in the length of postoperative hospitalization and thoracic drainage time (P>0.05). The serum IL-6, TNF-α, IL-8, cortisol, and epinephrine concentrations were lower in the lidocaine group on POD1 and POD2 (P<0.05). The incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting in the lidocaine group was lower (P<0.05), with no differences in other adverse events (P>0.05).

Conclusion: Compared with sufentanil-based PCIA, lidocaine-based PCIA significantly relieved postoperative pain and improved recovery quality after thoracoscopic lung surgery with fewer postoperative adverse events, which is a considerable choice for postoperative analgesia.

Trial registration: This study was retrospectively registered at the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry on March 1st, 2023 (number ChiCTR2300068840).

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Drug Design, Development and Therapy
Drug Design, Development and Therapy CHEMISTRY, MEDICINAL-PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
CiteScore
9.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
382
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Drug Design, Development and Therapy is an international, peer-reviewed, open access journal that spans the spectrum of drug design, discovery and development through to clinical applications. The journal is characterized by the rapid reporting of high-quality original research, reviews, expert opinions, commentary and clinical studies in all therapeutic areas. Specific topics covered by the journal include: Drug target identification and validation Phenotypic screening and target deconvolution Biochemical analyses of drug targets and their pathways New methods or relevant applications in molecular/drug design and computer-aided drug discovery* Design, synthesis, and biological evaluation of novel biologically active compounds (including diagnostics or chemical probes) Structural or molecular biological studies elucidating molecular recognition processes Fragment-based drug discovery Pharmaceutical/red biotechnology Isolation, structural characterization, (bio)synthesis, bioengineering and pharmacological evaluation of natural products** Distribution, pharmacokinetics and metabolic transformations of drugs or biologically active compounds in drug development Drug delivery and formulation (design and characterization of dosage forms, release mechanisms and in vivo testing) Preclinical development studies Translational animal models Mechanisms of action and signalling pathways Toxicology Gene therapy, cell therapy and immunotherapy Personalized medicine and pharmacogenomics Clinical drug evaluation Patient safety and sustained use of medicines.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信