美国中西部地区乳腺癌基因检测的采用:对少数民族人群中障碍和促进因素的系统回顾。

IF 3.2 2区 生物学 Q3 BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY
Nandu Meshram, Bobie Williams, Abigail Andresen, Dominic Mosha, Melissa Vetter
{"title":"美国中西部地区乳腺癌基因检测的采用:对少数民族人群中障碍和促进因素的系统回顾。","authors":"Nandu Meshram, Bobie Williams, Abigail Andresen, Dominic Mosha, Melissa Vetter","doi":"10.1093/hmg/ddaf139","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Hereditary breast cancer, primarily linked to pathogenic BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations, accounts for 5%-10% of all breast cancer cases in the United States. Despite national guidelines recommending genetic testing for individuals at elevated hereditary risk, uptake remains disproportionately low among African American and Hispanic/Latina women. Despite elevated risk in Black women data on genetic testing uptake in St. Louis is absent.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This systematic review aimed to address three research questions: (1) Are there racial and ethnic disparities in the utilization of BRCA genetic testing in Saint Louis? (2) What individual, provider, and systemic factors influence testing uptake among diverse populations? (3) What policy-level interventions are feasible and effective to improve BRCA testing rates in the city?</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic search of MEDLINE, EMBASE, APA PsycInfo, CINAHL Plus, Scopus, and Web of Science yielded 264 unique records. Twenty-five peer-reviewed studies published between 1996 and 2024 were included after applying inclusion criteria and quality appraisal. The studies span quantitative, qualitative, and mixed methods research on high-risk populations.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>BRCA awareness among African American women was significantly lower (12%-32%) than among White women (65%-75%). Fear of results (54%), mistrust, and concern over genetic discrimination (60%) were major barriers. Referral disparities were also stark-African American women were 50% less likely to receive provider referrals. Only 5% of genetic counselors identified as Black or Hispanic.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>No studies specifically examined BRCA testing disparities in Saint Louis. Findings from similar Midwestern cities suggest urgent need for locally informed, equity-focused interventions.</p>","PeriodicalId":13070,"journal":{"name":"Human molecular genetics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Breast cancer genetic testing uptake in the Midwest, USA: a systematic review of barriers and facilitators among minority populations.\",\"authors\":\"Nandu Meshram, Bobie Williams, Abigail Andresen, Dominic Mosha, Melissa Vetter\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/hmg/ddaf139\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Hereditary breast cancer, primarily linked to pathogenic BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations, accounts for 5%-10% of all breast cancer cases in the United States. Despite national guidelines recommending genetic testing for individuals at elevated hereditary risk, uptake remains disproportionately low among African American and Hispanic/Latina women. Despite elevated risk in Black women data on genetic testing uptake in St. Louis is absent.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This systematic review aimed to address three research questions: (1) Are there racial and ethnic disparities in the utilization of BRCA genetic testing in Saint Louis? (2) What individual, provider, and systemic factors influence testing uptake among diverse populations? (3) What policy-level interventions are feasible and effective to improve BRCA testing rates in the city?</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic search of MEDLINE, EMBASE, APA PsycInfo, CINAHL Plus, Scopus, and Web of Science yielded 264 unique records. Twenty-five peer-reviewed studies published between 1996 and 2024 were included after applying inclusion criteria and quality appraisal. The studies span quantitative, qualitative, and mixed methods research on high-risk populations.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>BRCA awareness among African American women was significantly lower (12%-32%) than among White women (65%-75%). Fear of results (54%), mistrust, and concern over genetic discrimination (60%) were major barriers. Referral disparities were also stark-African American women were 50% less likely to receive provider referrals. Only 5% of genetic counselors identified as Black or Hispanic.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>No studies specifically examined BRCA testing disparities in Saint Louis. Findings from similar Midwestern cities suggest urgent need for locally informed, equity-focused interventions.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13070,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Human molecular genetics\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Human molecular genetics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/hmg/ddaf139\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Human molecular genetics","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/hmg/ddaf139","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:遗传性乳腺癌主要与致病性BRCA1和BRCA2突变有关,占美国所有乳腺癌病例的5%-10%。尽管国家指南建议对遗传风险较高的个体进行基因检测,但非裔美国人和西班牙裔/拉丁裔妇女的接受率仍然低得不成比例。尽管黑人妇女的患病风险较高,但圣路易斯没有关于基因检测的数据。目的:本系统综述旨在解决三个研究问题:(1)在圣路易斯BRCA基因检测的使用中是否存在种族和民族差异?(2)哪些个体、提供者和系统因素影响不同人群对检测的接受?(3)哪些政策层面的干预措施是可行和有效的,可以提高城市BRCA检测率?方法:系统检索MEDLINE、EMBASE、APA PsycInfo、CINAHL Plus、Scopus和Web of Science,得到264条独特记录。在应用纳入标准和质量评估后,纳入了1996年至2024年间发表的25项同行评议研究。这些研究涵盖了对高危人群的定量、定性和混合方法研究。结果:非洲裔美国妇女对BRCA的认识明显低于白人妇女(65%-75%)(12%-32%)。对结果的恐惧(54%)、不信任和对基因歧视的担忧(60%)是主要障碍。转诊差异也很明显——非裔美国妇女接受医生转诊的可能性要低50%。只有5%的遗传咨询师是黑人或西班牙裔。结论:没有研究专门检查了圣路易斯的BRCA检测差异。来自中西部类似城市的调查结果表明,迫切需要了解当地情况,以公平为重点的干预措施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Breast cancer genetic testing uptake in the Midwest, USA: a systematic review of barriers and facilitators among minority populations.

Background: Hereditary breast cancer, primarily linked to pathogenic BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations, accounts for 5%-10% of all breast cancer cases in the United States. Despite national guidelines recommending genetic testing for individuals at elevated hereditary risk, uptake remains disproportionately low among African American and Hispanic/Latina women. Despite elevated risk in Black women data on genetic testing uptake in St. Louis is absent.

Objective: This systematic review aimed to address three research questions: (1) Are there racial and ethnic disparities in the utilization of BRCA genetic testing in Saint Louis? (2) What individual, provider, and systemic factors influence testing uptake among diverse populations? (3) What policy-level interventions are feasible and effective to improve BRCA testing rates in the city?

Methods: A systematic search of MEDLINE, EMBASE, APA PsycInfo, CINAHL Plus, Scopus, and Web of Science yielded 264 unique records. Twenty-five peer-reviewed studies published between 1996 and 2024 were included after applying inclusion criteria and quality appraisal. The studies span quantitative, qualitative, and mixed methods research on high-risk populations.

Results: BRCA awareness among African American women was significantly lower (12%-32%) than among White women (65%-75%). Fear of results (54%), mistrust, and concern over genetic discrimination (60%) were major barriers. Referral disparities were also stark-African American women were 50% less likely to receive provider referrals. Only 5% of genetic counselors identified as Black or Hispanic.

Conclusions: No studies specifically examined BRCA testing disparities in Saint Louis. Findings from similar Midwestern cities suggest urgent need for locally informed, equity-focused interventions.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Human molecular genetics
Human molecular genetics 生物-生化与分子生物学
CiteScore
6.90
自引率
2.90%
发文量
294
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: Human Molecular Genetics concentrates on full-length research papers covering a wide range of topics in all aspects of human molecular genetics. These include: the molecular basis of human genetic disease developmental genetics cancer genetics neurogenetics chromosome and genome structure and function therapy of genetic disease stem cells in human genetic disease and therapy, including the application of iPS cells genome-wide association studies mouse and other models of human diseases functional genomics computational genomics In addition, the journal also publishes research on other model systems for the analysis of genes, especially when there is an obvious relevance to human genetics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信