Junghyun Lee , Yun Min Song , Hwi-yeol Yun , Suein Choi , Jae Kyoung Kim
{"title":"超越Michaelis-Menten:改进的酶动力学方程改善了自下而上PBPK模型中药物代谢预测。","authors":"Junghyun Lee , Yun Min Song , Hwi-yeol Yun , Suein Choi , Jae Kyoung Kim","doi":"10.1016/j.ejps.2025.107286","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) models are widely used methodology that dynamically integrates diverse biological parameters to predict pharmacokinetic profiles of drugs and their metabolites. Traditionally, PBPK models rely on the Michaelis-Menten (MM) equation to describe enzymatic rate processes such as transport, metabolism, and secretion in terms of intrinsic clearance. However, the MM equation assumes that enzyme concentrations (<span><math><msub><mi>E</mi><mi>T</mi></msub></math></span>) are substantially lower than the MM constant (<span><math><msub><mi>K</mi><mi>M</mi></msub></math></span>). This condition is often violated in vivo, resulting in inaccuracies in predicting clearance and drug-drug interactions. To address these inaccuracies, current PBPK approaches employ parameter optimization using phase I clinical trial data. However, this conflicts with the bottom-up paradigm of predicting human pharmacokinetics from preclinical data prior to human trials. Here, we resolve this conflict by implementing a modified metabolic rate equation within the PBPK modeling framework. Unlike the MM equation, the modified equation remains valid even when <span><math><msub><mi>E</mi><mi>T</mi></msub></math></span> is comparable to <span><math><msub><mi>K</mi><mi>M</mi></msub></math></span>, thereby improving prediction accuracy in static models. Our results demonstrate that using the modified equation outperforms the conventional MM-based method even in dynamic PBPK modeling, particularly in scenarios where the MM equation's assumptions are invalid. Based on these findings, we propose expanded guidelines to broaden the applicability of PBPK modeling using the modified equation. This advancement offers a significant contribution to pharmacokinetic research and enhances the utility of PBPK models in drug development.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":12018,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences","volume":"214 ","pages":"Article 107286"},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Beyond Michaelis-Menten: A modified enzyme kinetics equation improves drug metabolism prediction in bottom-Up PBPK modeling\",\"authors\":\"Junghyun Lee , Yun Min Song , Hwi-yeol Yun , Suein Choi , Jae Kyoung Kim\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ejps.2025.107286\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) models are widely used methodology that dynamically integrates diverse biological parameters to predict pharmacokinetic profiles of drugs and their metabolites. Traditionally, PBPK models rely on the Michaelis-Menten (MM) equation to describe enzymatic rate processes such as transport, metabolism, and secretion in terms of intrinsic clearance. However, the MM equation assumes that enzyme concentrations (<span><math><msub><mi>E</mi><mi>T</mi></msub></math></span>) are substantially lower than the MM constant (<span><math><msub><mi>K</mi><mi>M</mi></msub></math></span>). This condition is often violated in vivo, resulting in inaccuracies in predicting clearance and drug-drug interactions. To address these inaccuracies, current PBPK approaches employ parameter optimization using phase I clinical trial data. However, this conflicts with the bottom-up paradigm of predicting human pharmacokinetics from preclinical data prior to human trials. Here, we resolve this conflict by implementing a modified metabolic rate equation within the PBPK modeling framework. Unlike the MM equation, the modified equation remains valid even when <span><math><msub><mi>E</mi><mi>T</mi></msub></math></span> is comparable to <span><math><msub><mi>K</mi><mi>M</mi></msub></math></span>, thereby improving prediction accuracy in static models. Our results demonstrate that using the modified equation outperforms the conventional MM-based method even in dynamic PBPK modeling, particularly in scenarios where the MM equation's assumptions are invalid. Based on these findings, we propose expanded guidelines to broaden the applicability of PBPK modeling using the modified equation. This advancement offers a significant contribution to pharmacokinetic research and enhances the utility of PBPK models in drug development.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12018,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences\",\"volume\":\"214 \",\"pages\":\"Article 107286\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0928098725002842\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0928098725002842","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Beyond Michaelis-Menten: A modified enzyme kinetics equation improves drug metabolism prediction in bottom-Up PBPK modeling
Physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) models are widely used methodology that dynamically integrates diverse biological parameters to predict pharmacokinetic profiles of drugs and their metabolites. Traditionally, PBPK models rely on the Michaelis-Menten (MM) equation to describe enzymatic rate processes such as transport, metabolism, and secretion in terms of intrinsic clearance. However, the MM equation assumes that enzyme concentrations () are substantially lower than the MM constant (). This condition is often violated in vivo, resulting in inaccuracies in predicting clearance and drug-drug interactions. To address these inaccuracies, current PBPK approaches employ parameter optimization using phase I clinical trial data. However, this conflicts with the bottom-up paradigm of predicting human pharmacokinetics from preclinical data prior to human trials. Here, we resolve this conflict by implementing a modified metabolic rate equation within the PBPK modeling framework. Unlike the MM equation, the modified equation remains valid even when is comparable to , thereby improving prediction accuracy in static models. Our results demonstrate that using the modified equation outperforms the conventional MM-based method even in dynamic PBPK modeling, particularly in scenarios where the MM equation's assumptions are invalid. Based on these findings, we propose expanded guidelines to broaden the applicability of PBPK modeling using the modified equation. This advancement offers a significant contribution to pharmacokinetic research and enhances the utility of PBPK models in drug development.
期刊介绍:
The journal publishes research articles, review articles and scientific commentaries on all aspects of the pharmaceutical sciences with emphasis on conceptual novelty and scientific quality. The Editors welcome articles in this multidisciplinary field, with a focus on topics relevant for drug discovery and development.
More specifically, the Journal publishes reports on medicinal chemistry, pharmacology, drug absorption and metabolism, pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics, pharmaceutical and biomedical analysis, drug delivery (including gene delivery), drug targeting, pharmaceutical technology, pharmaceutical biotechnology and clinical drug evaluation. The journal will typically not give priority to manuscripts focusing primarily on organic synthesis, natural products, adaptation of analytical approaches, or discussions pertaining to drug policy making.
Scientific commentaries and review articles are generally by invitation only or by consent of the Editors. Proceedings of scientific meetings may be published as special issues or supplements to the Journal.